The difference again challenged

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

This article asks about certain suffering of feminism as it is a mass movement on the one hand and on the other by a flattening on the different levels that make up the link between men and women. Poses that man is man for woman and this is woman for man, meaning that the sexes are defined from a re...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ritvo, Juan Bautista
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2020
Materias:
Psicoanálisis
Feminismo
Falo
Amor
Diferencia
Psychoanalysis
Feminism
Phallus
Love
Difference
Acceso en línea:https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/36
Aporte de:
Psicoanálisis en la Universidad de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R204-article-36
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R204-article-362020-10-02T23:24:11Z The difference again challenged La diferencia nuevamente interpelada Ritvo, Juan Bautista Psicoanálisis Feminismo Falo Amor Diferencia Psychoanalysis Feminism Phallus Love Difference This article asks about certain suffering of feminism as it is a mass movement on the one hand and on the other by a flattening on the different levels that make up the link between men and women. Poses that man is man for woman and this is woman for man, meaning that the sexes are defined from a relationship, although it is an asymmetric link. He asks about the phallus and defines it as what circulates between the sexes. He points out that man and woman are categories that psychoanalysis constructs from the experience of transference. It also suggests that hysteria is not femininity, although this is its reference and that it is subject to such control that its strategies end up sterilizing desire. On the other hand, femininity consists in the possibility of being open to chance. And virility implies that someone is able to separate the woman from the mother, allowing her to be both object and cause of jouissance. The deep imbrication of the sexes is unknown by feminism, The phallic activity of the male implies, necessarily, an aggressive component that militant feminism does not cease to confuse with abuse and even with rape. There are no signifiers that harmonize a plane of difficult construction, because there is revealed an absent object that exposes human beings to the metonymic pilgrimage. Este artículo se pregunta por cierto padecimiento del feminismo en tanto es un movimiento de masas por un lado y por el otro por un aplanamiento en los distintos niveles que conforman el vínculo entre hombres y mujeres. Plantea que el hombre es hombre para la mujer y esta es mujer para el hombre, es decir que los sexos se definen a partir de una relación, aunque se trata de un vínculo asimétrico. Se pregunta por el falo y lo define como lo que circula entre los sexos. Puntualiza que hombre y mujer son categorías que el psicoanálisis construye a partir de la experiencia de la transferencia. Plantea también que la histeria no es la feminidad, aunque ésta sea su referencia y que está sometida a un control tal, que sus estrategias terminan por esterilizar el deseo. Por otra parte la feminidad consiste en la posibilidad de estar abierta al azar. Y la virilidad implica que alguien esté en condiciones de separar a la mujer de la madre, permitiendo que aquella sea a la vez objeto y causa de goce. Esta profunda imbricación de los sexos es desconocida por el feminismo, la actividad fálica del varón implica, necesariamente, un componente agresivo que el feminismo militante no cesa de confundir con el abuso e incluso con la violación. No hay significantes que armonicen un plano de difícil construcción, porque allí se revela un objeto ausente que expone a los seres humanos a la peregrinación metonímica. Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2020-05-08 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/36 10.35305/rpu.v0i3.36 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; No. 3 (2019); 91-102 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; Núm. 3 (2019); 91-102 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; No 3 (2019); 91-102 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; n. 3 (2019); 91-102 2683-9938 2591-2844 spa https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/36/24
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-204
container_title_str Psicoanálisis en la Universidad
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Psicoanálisis
Feminismo
Falo
Amor
Diferencia
Psychoanalysis
Feminism
Phallus
Love
Difference
spellingShingle Psicoanálisis
Feminismo
Falo
Amor
Diferencia
Psychoanalysis
Feminism
Phallus
Love
Difference
Ritvo, Juan Bautista
The difference again challenged
topic_facet Psicoanálisis
Feminismo
Falo
Amor
Diferencia
Psychoanalysis
Feminism
Phallus
Love
Difference
author Ritvo, Juan Bautista
author_facet Ritvo, Juan Bautista
author_sort Ritvo, Juan Bautista
title The difference again challenged
title_short The difference again challenged
title_full The difference again challenged
title_fullStr The difference again challenged
title_full_unstemmed The difference again challenged
title_sort difference again challenged
description This article asks about certain suffering of feminism as it is a mass movement on the one hand and on the other by a flattening on the different levels that make up the link between men and women. Poses that man is man for woman and this is woman for man, meaning that the sexes are defined from a relationship, although it is an asymmetric link. He asks about the phallus and defines it as what circulates between the sexes. He points out that man and woman are categories that psychoanalysis constructs from the experience of transference. It also suggests that hysteria is not femininity, although this is its reference and that it is subject to such control that its strategies end up sterilizing desire. On the other hand, femininity consists in the possibility of being open to chance. And virility implies that someone is able to separate the woman from the mother, allowing her to be both object and cause of jouissance. The deep imbrication of the sexes is unknown by feminism, The phallic activity of the male implies, necessarily, an aggressive component that militant feminism does not cease to confuse with abuse and even with rape. There are no signifiers that harmonize a plane of difficult construction, because there is revealed an absent object that exposes human beings to the metonymic pilgrimage.
publisher Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario
publishDate 2020
url https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/36
work_keys_str_mv AT ritvojuanbautista thedifferenceagainchallenged
AT ritvojuanbautista ladiferencianuevamenteinterpelada
AT ritvojuanbautista differenceagainchallenged
first_indexed 2023-05-11T18:45:53Z
last_indexed 2023-05-11T18:45:53Z
_version_ 1765624516019486720

Ejemplares similares