The Flesh and the irreversibility of the body in the domain of the drive

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

The methodology of this paper is theoretical. Our main objective is to examine the vision in Merleau-Ponty’s space, in order to interrogate the body beyond the specular structure of the imaginary. The failure of identity between activity and passivity can be used as a ground to analyze the body on t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Carignano, Bruno
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2020
Materias:
Cuerpo
carne
narcisismo
pulsión
imaginario
Body
Flesh
Narcissism
Drive
Imaginary
Acceso en línea:https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/20
Aporte de:
Psicoanálisis en la Universidad de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R204-article-20
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R204-article-202020-07-03T21:48:14Z The Flesh and the irreversibility of the body in the domain of the drive La carne y lo irreversible del cuerpo pulsional Carignano, Bruno Cuerpo carne narcisismo pulsión imaginario Body Flesh Narcissism Drive Imaginary The methodology of this paper is theoretical. Our main objective is to examine the vision in Merleau-Ponty’s space, in order to interrogate the body beyond the specular structure of the imaginary. The failure of identity between activity and passivity can be used as a ground to analyze the body on the axis drive-phantasy. We examine how the notion of a failed reversibility can be related to the different senses of the Flesh, and we interrogate the body that is determined by the negativity of the drive. That leads us to consider the difference with the ontology of the Flesh deduced in Melanie Klein’s theory by Merleau-Ponty. Afterwards, we examine some crucial distinctions made by Freud and Lacan. They allow us to distinguish, from the point of view of the object, the body in the narcissistic field of love from the body in the domain of the drive: while in the former there is a dissolution of both the dimensions of the Other and the object as cause of desire, in the latter we face the transcendence of the object. Finally, we consider the theoretical importance of the autoerotic limit of the drive, which can be illustrated with the accomplishment of the reversibility of the Flesh. Con una metodología teórica examinamos a la visión comprendida en el espacio merleau-pontyano; el objetivo es el de interrogar al excedente del cuerpo respecto del imaginario especular. La reversibilidad malograda entre lo activo y lo pasivo que allí se vislumbra nos sirve de fundamento para circunscribir al cuerpo pulsional en su anclaje fantasmático. Nos apoyamos en la distinción establecida por Merleau-Ponty entre la carne del cuerpo y la carne del mundo para dilucidar la negatividad que trabaja al cuerpo pulsional. La interferencia de la alteridad permite contraponerlo al modo del cuerpo desprendido de su ontología de la carne, cuya réplica él pesquisa en teorizaciones de Melanie Klein. Tomando en cuenta estas consideraciones, nos dirigimos a algunos desarrollos de Freud y Lacan para despejar la disparidad de los cuerpos pulsional y narcisista: al eclipse, en el campo del amor narcisista, de las dimensiones del Otro y del objeto causa puede contraponerse el tratamiento del objeto característico del plano pulsional. El límite autoerótico de la pulsión, figurado en la reversibilidad consumada de la carne, oficia de modelo que tomamos finalmente en consideración para exponer, por contraste, el estatuto de la pulsión parcial. Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2020-04-08 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/20 10.35305/rpu.v0i2.20 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; No. 2 (2018); 31-49 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; Núm. 2 (2018); 31-49 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; No 2 (2018); 31-49 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; n. 2 (2018); 31-49 2683-9938 2591-2844 spa https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/20/10
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-204
container_title_str Psicoanálisis en la Universidad
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Cuerpo
carne
narcisismo
pulsión
imaginario
Body
Flesh
Narcissism
Drive
Imaginary
spellingShingle Cuerpo
carne
narcisismo
pulsión
imaginario
Body
Flesh
Narcissism
Drive
Imaginary
Carignano, Bruno
The Flesh and the irreversibility of the body in the domain of the drive
topic_facet Cuerpo
carne
narcisismo
pulsión
imaginario
Body
Flesh
Narcissism
Drive
Imaginary
author Carignano, Bruno
author_facet Carignano, Bruno
author_sort Carignano, Bruno
title The Flesh and the irreversibility of the body in the domain of the drive
title_short The Flesh and the irreversibility of the body in the domain of the drive
title_full The Flesh and the irreversibility of the body in the domain of the drive
title_fullStr The Flesh and the irreversibility of the body in the domain of the drive
title_full_unstemmed The Flesh and the irreversibility of the body in the domain of the drive
title_sort flesh and the irreversibility of the body in the domain of the drive
description The methodology of this paper is theoretical. Our main objective is to examine the vision in Merleau-Ponty’s space, in order to interrogate the body beyond the specular structure of the imaginary. The failure of identity between activity and passivity can be used as a ground to analyze the body on the axis drive-phantasy. We examine how the notion of a failed reversibility can be related to the different senses of the Flesh, and we interrogate the body that is determined by the negativity of the drive. That leads us to consider the difference with the ontology of the Flesh deduced in Melanie Klein’s theory by Merleau-Ponty. Afterwards, we examine some crucial distinctions made by Freud and Lacan. They allow us to distinguish, from the point of view of the object, the body in the narcissistic field of love from the body in the domain of the drive: while in the former there is a dissolution of both the dimensions of the Other and the object as cause of desire, in the latter we face the transcendence of the object. Finally, we consider the theoretical importance of the autoerotic limit of the drive, which can be illustrated with the accomplishment of the reversibility of the Flesh.
publisher Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario
publishDate 2020
url https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/20
work_keys_str_mv AT carignanobruno thefleshandtheirreversibilityofthebodyinthedomainofthedrive
AT carignanobruno lacarneyloirreversibledelcuerpopulsional
AT carignanobruno fleshandtheirreversibilityofthebodyinthedomainofthedrive
first_indexed 2023-05-11T18:45:50Z
last_indexed 2023-05-11T18:45:50Z
_version_ 1765624513531215872

Ejemplares similares