Extimacy: language, history and real

The concept of extimacy that Lacan formulated in Seminar 7. The ethics of psychoanalysis has a capital relevance for the analysis of the discourse of the so-called French school (ADF) in particular and for linguistics in general. However, this relevance has not been widely indicated nor has it been...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cardozo Gonzalez, Santiago
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/194
Aporte de:
id I15-R204-article-194
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R204-article-1942025-05-24T13:07:14Z Extimacy: language, history and real Extimidad: lenguaje historia y real Cardozo Gonzalez, Santiago lenguaje discurso historia sujeto Extimacy Language Discourse History Subject The concept of extimacy that Lacan formulated in Seminar 7. The ethics of psychoanalysis has a capital relevance for the analysis of the discourse of the so-called French school (ADF) in particular and for linguistics in general. However, this relevance has not been widely indicated nor has it been staged in theoretical texts or in the specific discursive analyzes that have been carried out, a fact that is, if not especially striking, at least worthy of calling our attention. This article seeks to be an inquiry into some of the theoretical and practical consequences that the Lacanian concept at stake implies for the analysis of “French-style” discourse, particularly for the analysis that I propose here of the expression our history as current discourse, said by any speaker in any circumstance, and also as a discourse proper to history as a discipline. El concepto de extimidad que Lacan formulara en el Seminario 7 La ética del psicoanálisis tiene una relevancia mayúscula para el análisis del discurso de la llamada escuela francesa (ADF) en particular y para la lingüística en general. Sin embargo, dicha relevancia no ha sido mayormente señalada, como tampoco puesta en escena en los textos teóricos ni en los análisis discursivos concretos que se han llevado adelante, hecho que resulta, si no especialmente llamativo, al menos digno de convocar nuestra atención. El presente artículo procura ser una indagación sobre algunas de las consecuencias teóricas y prácticas que implica el concepto lacaniano en juego para el ADF, particularmente para el análisis que propongo aquí de la expresión nuestra historia como discurso corriente, dicho por cualquier hablante en cualquier circunstancia, y también como discurso propio de la historia como disciplina Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2024-05-24 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/194 10.35305/rpu.v8i8.194 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; Vol. 8 No. 8 (2024): Revista Psicoanálisis en la Universidad; 159-172 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; Vol. 8 Núm. 8 (2024): Revista Psicoanálisis en la Universidad; 159-172 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; Vol. 8 No 8 (2024): Revista Psicoanálisis en la Universidad; 159-172 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; v. 8 n. 8 (2024): Revista Psicoanálisis en la Universidad; 159-172 2683-9938 2591-2844 spa https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/194/171 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-204
container_title_str Psicoanálisis en la Universidad
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic lenguaje
discurso
historia
sujeto
Extimacy
Language
Discourse
History
Subject
spellingShingle lenguaje
discurso
historia
sujeto
Extimacy
Language
Discourse
History
Subject
Cardozo Gonzalez, Santiago
Extimacy: language, history and real
topic_facet lenguaje
discurso
historia
sujeto
Extimacy
Language
Discourse
History
Subject
author Cardozo Gonzalez, Santiago
author_facet Cardozo Gonzalez, Santiago
author_sort Cardozo Gonzalez, Santiago
title Extimacy: language, history and real
title_short Extimacy: language, history and real
title_full Extimacy: language, history and real
title_fullStr Extimacy: language, history and real
title_full_unstemmed Extimacy: language, history and real
title_sort extimacy: language, history and real
description The concept of extimacy that Lacan formulated in Seminar 7. The ethics of psychoanalysis has a capital relevance for the analysis of the discourse of the so-called French school (ADF) in particular and for linguistics in general. However, this relevance has not been widely indicated nor has it been staged in theoretical texts or in the specific discursive analyzes that have been carried out, a fact that is, if not especially striking, at least worthy of calling our attention. This article seeks to be an inquiry into some of the theoretical and practical consequences that the Lacanian concept at stake implies for the analysis of “French-style” discourse, particularly for the analysis that I propose here of the expression our history as current discourse, said by any speaker in any circumstance, and also as a discourse proper to history as a discipline.
publisher Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario
publishDate 2024
url https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/194
work_keys_str_mv AT cardozogonzalezsantiago extimacylanguagehistoryandreal
AT cardozogonzalezsantiago extimidadlenguajehistoriayreal
first_indexed 2024-08-12T21:40:05Z
last_indexed 2025-06-04T05:07:37Z
_version_ 1833973745356636160