Guerra híbrida:: circunvalando la lógica nuclear

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

In this article, we criticize the general nuclear equilibria thesis as stated by Neorealist school, based on which they found their recommendation that every state should develop nuclear weaponry. Our main argument against this idea is that equilibrium of power (and system stability that stem from i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Oviedo, Nicolás Ignacio
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2019
Materias:
Hybrid warfare
Nuclear equilibria
Crimea
Russia
Guerra híbrida
Equilibrio nuclear
Rusia
Acceso en línea:https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/13
Aporte de:
Perspectivas – Revista de Ciencias Sociales de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R203-article-13
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R203-article-132022-07-09T04:19:30Z Guerra híbrida:: circunvalando la lógica nuclear Oviedo, Nicolás Ignacio Hybrid warfare Nuclear equilibria Crimea Russia Guerra híbrida Equilibrio nuclear Crimea Rusia In this article, we criticize the general nuclear equilibria thesis as stated by Neorealist school, based on which they found their recommendation that every state should develop nuclear weaponry. Our main argument against this idea is that equilibrium of power (and system stability that stem from it) depends not on specific features of the agents (like possessing or not a weapon) but on structural variables. Russian deployment of hybrid tactics supports the idea that, if systemic tensions prevail, states will find whatever means to channel them, in case direct war is prohibitive costly. To prove this point we identify hybrid war’s main attributes based on the literature available. Afterwards, we single out sets of general conditions and intermediate variables which turn rationale hybrid warfare. Russia’s annexation of Crimea will serve as example. Finally, we summarize the nuclear equilibria thesis’ main flaws in the conclusion section. En este artículo discutimos la tesis del equilibrio general nuclear postulada por el neorrealismo, cuyo corolario es la recomendación de que los Estados se hagan de armas nucleares. Nuestro principal argumento consiste en que el equilibrio de poder (y la estabilidad del sistema que de este puede derivarse) depende de variables estructurales, no de características de las unidades como la posesión de un determinado artefacto. El despliegue ruso de la guerra híbrida evidencia que, si las tensiones sistémicas prevalecen, los Estados encontrarán otros medios para canalizarlas en caso de que el enfrentamiento bélico directo conlleve costos prohibitivos. Para probar el punto, caracterizamos la guerra híbrida a partir de la literatura sobre la materia. Seguidamente, identificamos las condiciones estructurales y las variables intermedias que generan un entorno propicio para el desarrollo de guerras híbridas. Apelamos a la anexión de Crimea por parte de Rusia para ilustrar la materia. Para finalizar, resumimos las debilidades de la tesis neorrealista en el apartado de conclusiones. Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2019-12-09 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Convocatoria por invitación application/pdf https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/13 10.35305/prcs.v0i7.13 Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 4 No. 7 (2019): Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales No. 7 Enero-Junio 2019; 81-98 Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 4 Núm. 7 (2019): Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales No. 7 Enero-Junio 2019; 81-98 2525-1112 spa https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/13/10
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-203
container_title_str Perspectivas – Revista de Ciencias Sociales
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Hybrid warfare
Nuclear equilibria
Crimea
Russia
Guerra híbrida
Equilibrio nuclear
Crimea
Rusia
spellingShingle Hybrid warfare
Nuclear equilibria
Crimea
Russia
Guerra híbrida
Equilibrio nuclear
Crimea
Rusia
Oviedo, Nicolás Ignacio
Guerra híbrida:: circunvalando la lógica nuclear
topic_facet Hybrid warfare
Nuclear equilibria
Crimea
Russia
Guerra híbrida
Equilibrio nuclear
Crimea
Rusia
author Oviedo, Nicolás Ignacio
author_facet Oviedo, Nicolás Ignacio
author_sort Oviedo, Nicolás Ignacio
title Guerra híbrida:: circunvalando la lógica nuclear
title_short Guerra híbrida:: circunvalando la lógica nuclear
title_full Guerra híbrida:: circunvalando la lógica nuclear
title_fullStr Guerra híbrida:: circunvalando la lógica nuclear
title_full_unstemmed Guerra híbrida:: circunvalando la lógica nuclear
title_sort guerra híbrida:: circunvalando la lógica nuclear
description In this article, we criticize the general nuclear equilibria thesis as stated by Neorealist school, based on which they found their recommendation that every state should develop nuclear weaponry. Our main argument against this idea is that equilibrium of power (and system stability that stem from it) depends not on specific features of the agents (like possessing or not a weapon) but on structural variables. Russian deployment of hybrid tactics supports the idea that, if systemic tensions prevail, states will find whatever means to channel them, in case direct war is prohibitive costly. To prove this point we identify hybrid war’s main attributes based on the literature available. Afterwards, we single out sets of general conditions and intermediate variables which turn rationale hybrid warfare. Russia’s annexation of Crimea will serve as example. Finally, we summarize the nuclear equilibria thesis’ main flaws in the conclusion section.
publisher Universidad Nacional de Rosario
publishDate 2019
url https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/13
work_keys_str_mv AT oviedonicolasignacio guerrahibridacircunvalandolalogicanuclear
first_indexed 2023-05-11T18:44:36Z
last_indexed 2023-05-11T18:44:36Z
_version_ 1765624435129188352

Ejemplares similares