The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension
The matter of the Right to the city, originally define by Henry Lefebvre in 1968, has been (re) visited by many social scientists. Today, it reemerges with emphasis, not only from the academic and the social movements fields, but also from the field of policy making, that make their own reinterpreta...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Instituto de Cartografía, Investigación y Formación para el Ordenamiento Territorial. CIFOT.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/proyeccion/article/view/4678 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I11-R91article-4678 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo |
institution_str |
I-11 |
repository_str |
R-91 |
container_title_str |
Proyección. Estudios Geográficos y de Ordenamiento Territorial |
language |
Español |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
Derecho a la ciudad Latinoamérica agendas urbanas Right to the city Latinamerica Urban Agendas |
spellingShingle |
Derecho a la ciudad Latinoamérica agendas urbanas Right to the city Latinamerica Urban Agendas Canestraro, Maria Laura Jakuwobicz, Melina The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension |
topic_facet |
Derecho a la ciudad Latinoamérica agendas urbanas Right to the city Latinamerica Urban Agendas |
author |
Canestraro, Maria Laura Jakuwobicz, Melina |
author_facet |
Canestraro, Maria Laura Jakuwobicz, Melina |
author_sort |
Canestraro, Maria Laura |
title |
The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension |
title_short |
The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension |
title_full |
The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension |
title_fullStr |
The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension |
title_full_unstemmed |
The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension |
title_sort |
right to the city in latin america: agendas in tension |
description |
The matter of the Right to the city, originally define by Henry Lefebvre in 1968, has been (re) visited by many social scientists. Today, it reemerges with emphasis, not only from the academic and the social movements fields, but also from the field of policy making, that make their own reinterpretations of its postulates, creating a tension around the axles that gave shape to the original notion. Thus, a new concept emerges, one that is ambiguous and indistinctly used both by progressive and conservative anti-democratic agendas.
We set ourselves to recover some of these debates regarding the right to the city within the latinamerican context, and put in question the controversies that emerge between its underlying principles and the general guidelines of the multilateral international organizations’ agendas that encourage its effective making in the region, more accurately, the case of UN-Habitat.
Our starting point is the original concept; we present some of its revisions and then move on to the regional debates. Then, we present the main topics of the aforesaid organization’s meetings: Habitat I (1976), Habitat II (1996) and Habitat III (2016). We take a special interest in the New Urban Agenda and the recomendations made to the Member |
publisher |
Instituto de Cartografía, Investigación y Formación para el Ordenamiento Territorial. CIFOT. |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/proyeccion/article/view/4678 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT canestraromarialaura therighttothecityinlatinamericaagendasintension AT jakuwobiczmelina therighttothecityinlatinamericaagendasintension AT canestraromarialaura elderechoalaciudadenlatinoamericaagendasentension AT jakuwobiczmelina elderechoalaciudadenlatinoamericaagendasentension AT canestraromarialaura righttothecityinlatinamericaagendasintension AT jakuwobiczmelina righttothecityinlatinamericaagendasintension |
first_indexed |
2022-06-20T13:32:22Z |
last_indexed |
2022-06-20T13:32:22Z |
bdutipo_str |
Revistas |
_version_ |
1764819785857630208 |