The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension

The matter of the Right to the city, originally define by Henry Lefebvre in 1968, has been (re) visited by many social scientists. Today, it reemerges with emphasis, not only from the academic and the social movements fields, but also from the field of policy making, that make their own reinterpreta...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Canestraro, Maria Laura, Jakuwobicz, Melina
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Instituto de Cartografía, Investigación y Formación para el Ordenamiento Territorial. CIFOT. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/proyeccion/article/view/4678
Aporte de:
id I11-R91article-4678
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
institution_str I-11
repository_str R-91
container_title_str Proyección. Estudios Geográficos y de Ordenamiento Territorial
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Derecho a la ciudad
Latinoamérica
agendas urbanas
Right to the city
Latinamerica
Urban Agendas
spellingShingle Derecho a la ciudad
Latinoamérica
agendas urbanas
Right to the city
Latinamerica
Urban Agendas
Canestraro, Maria Laura
Jakuwobicz, Melina
The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension
topic_facet Derecho a la ciudad
Latinoamérica
agendas urbanas
Right to the city
Latinamerica
Urban Agendas
author Canestraro, Maria Laura
Jakuwobicz, Melina
author_facet Canestraro, Maria Laura
Jakuwobicz, Melina
author_sort Canestraro, Maria Laura
title The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension
title_short The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension
title_full The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension
title_fullStr The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension
title_full_unstemmed The right to the city in Latin America: agendas in tension
title_sort right to the city in latin america: agendas in tension
description The matter of the Right to the city, originally define by Henry Lefebvre in 1968, has been (re) visited by many social scientists. Today, it reemerges with emphasis, not only from the academic and the social movements fields, but also from the field of policy making, that make their own reinterpretations of its postulates, creating a tension around the axles that gave shape to the original notion. Thus, a new concept emerges, one that is ambiguous and indistinctly used both by progressive and conservative anti-democratic agendas.  We set ourselves to recover some of these debates regarding the right to the city within the latinamerican context, and put in question the controversies that emerge between its underlying principles and the general guidelines of the multilateral international organizations’ agendas that encourage its effective making in the region, more accurately, the case of UN-Habitat. Our starting point is the original concept; we present some of its revisions and then move on to the regional debates. Then, we present the main topics of the aforesaid organization’s meetings: Habitat I (1976), Habitat II (1996) and Habitat III (2016). We take a special interest in the New Urban Agenda and the recomendations made to the Member 
publisher Instituto de Cartografía, Investigación y Formación para el Ordenamiento Territorial. CIFOT.
publishDate 2021
url https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/proyeccion/article/view/4678
work_keys_str_mv AT canestraromarialaura therighttothecityinlatinamericaagendasintension
AT jakuwobiczmelina therighttothecityinlatinamericaagendasintension
AT canestraromarialaura elderechoalaciudadenlatinoamericaagendasentension
AT jakuwobiczmelina elderechoalaciudadenlatinoamericaagendasentension
AT canestraromarialaura righttothecityinlatinamericaagendasintension
AT jakuwobiczmelina righttothecityinlatinamericaagendasintension
first_indexed 2022-06-20T13:32:22Z
last_indexed 2022-06-20T13:32:22Z
bdutipo_str Revistas
_version_ 1764819785857630208