All or nothing: The problem of (in)authenticity in Rayuela

Rayuela by Julio Cortázar has been interpreted as a denunciation of inauthenticity by way of the absurd. However, such a denunciation is not in itself a sufficient condition for the possibility of an authentic existence in a strict existential-ontological sense, that is, a resolved commitment in the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ralón, Laureano
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro Interdisciplinario de Literatura Hispanoamericana (CILHA) 2015
Materias:
Inautenticidad
Hedonismo
Rayuela
Cortázar
Heidegger
Inauthenticy
Hedonism
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/cilha/article/view/1551
Aporte de:
Cuadernos del CILHA de Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
id I11-R112article-1551
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
institution_str I-11
repository_str R-112
container_title_str Cuadernos del CILHA
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Inautenticidad
Hedonismo
Rayuela
Cortázar
Heidegger
Inauthenticy
Hedonism
Cortázar
Rayuela
Heidegger
spellingShingle Inautenticidad
Hedonismo
Rayuela
Cortázar
Heidegger
Inauthenticy
Hedonism
Cortázar
Rayuela
Heidegger
Ralón, Laureano
All or nothing: The problem of (in)authenticity in Rayuela
topic_facet Inautenticidad
Hedonismo
Rayuela
Cortázar
Heidegger
Inauthenticy
Hedonism
Cortázar
Rayuela
Heidegger
author Ralón, Laureano
author_facet Ralón, Laureano
author_sort Ralón, Laureano
title All or nothing: The problem of (in)authenticity in Rayuela
title_short All or nothing: The problem of (in)authenticity in Rayuela
title_full All or nothing: The problem of (in)authenticity in Rayuela
title_fullStr All or nothing: The problem of (in)authenticity in Rayuela
title_full_unstemmed All or nothing: The problem of (in)authenticity in Rayuela
title_sort all or nothing: the problem of (in)authenticity in rayuela
description Rayuela by Julio Cortázar has been interpreted as a denunciation of inauthenticity by way of the absurd. However, such a denunciation is not in itself a sufficient condition for the possibility of an authentic existence in a strict existential-ontological sense, that is, a resolved commitment in the face of finitude which is first revealed in being-toward-death but requires a projection toward future possibilities from the irreplaceability of each Dasein. Accordingly, the misfortunes of Horacio Oliveira are not attributable to a hedonistic impulse or a life without rules, but are linked to his erratic and reduccionist methodology. To the degree that it is possible to treat rationality and irrationality as two sides of the same metaphysical coin, Oliveira’s skeptical, "all-or-nothing" search can be understood as a critique of the radical subjectivism and the methodological individualism upheld modernity.
publisher Centro Interdisciplinario de Literatura Hispanoamericana (CILHA)
publishDate 2015
url https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/cilha/article/view/1551
work_keys_str_mv AT ralonlaureano allornothingtheproblemofinauthenticityinrayuela
AT ralonlaureano atodoonadaelproblemadelainautenticidadenrayuela
first_indexed 2022-06-20T13:44:51Z
last_indexed 2022-06-20T13:44:51Z
bdutipo_str Revistas
_version_ 1764819785441345536

Ejemplares similares