El sujeto de la enunciación y su simulacro. A propósito de Llegaron del mar de Mario Monteforte Toledo
Considering the discourse as a practice leads us to understand it as the result of choices made by an extratextual agent who builds a "world" - the statement – at the same time as he proposes a simulacrum of himself. This simulacrum is what concerns us in this work in which we consider the...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/8194 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Considering the discourse as a practice leads us to understand it as the result of choices made by an extratextual agent who builds a "world" - the statement – at the same time as he proposes a simulacrum of himself. This simulacrum is what concerns us in this work in which we consider the case of Mario Monteforte Toledo’s novel Llegaron del mar (1966). The analysis of the choices made by the agent, both those explicitly stated in the paratexts as those involved in the way of constructing the story and its characters on the basis of pre-hispanic texts, allows us to infer a particularly valued enonciator’s figure. |
|---|