UNIVERSITY POLITICS, MANAGMENT AND PLANNING IN THE PANDEMIC. THE CASE ON UNICEN

This article aims to continue the analyzes that we have been carrying out since the first year of the pandemic, recovering the contributions of references from the field of Situational Strategic Planning (PES) and higher education, in addition to systematizing documents and regulations of the Nation...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bianchini, María Laura, Di Marco, María Cecilia
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Núcleo de Estudios e Investigaciones en Educación Superior del MERCOSUR 2024
Materias:
University; Planning; Post Pandemic
Universidad; Planeamiento; Post Pandemia
Universidade; Planejamento; Pós Pandemia
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/integracionyconocimiento/article/view/45909
Aporte de:
Integración y Conocimiento de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R376-article-45909
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-376
container_title_str Integración y Conocimiento
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic University; Planning; Post Pandemic
Universidad; Planeamiento; Post Pandemia
Universidade; Planejamento; Pós Pandemia
spellingShingle University; Planning; Post Pandemic
Universidad; Planeamiento; Post Pandemia
Universidade; Planejamento; Pós Pandemia
Bianchini, María Laura
Di Marco, María Cecilia
UNIVERSITY POLITICS, MANAGMENT AND PLANNING IN THE PANDEMIC. THE CASE ON UNICEN
topic_facet University; Planning; Post Pandemic
Universidad; Planeamiento; Post Pandemia
Universidade; Planejamento; Pós Pandemia
author Bianchini, María Laura
Di Marco, María Cecilia
author_facet Bianchini, María Laura
Di Marco, María Cecilia
author_sort Bianchini, María Laura
title UNIVERSITY POLITICS, MANAGMENT AND PLANNING IN THE PANDEMIC. THE CASE ON UNICEN
title_short UNIVERSITY POLITICS, MANAGMENT AND PLANNING IN THE PANDEMIC. THE CASE ON UNICEN
title_full UNIVERSITY POLITICS, MANAGMENT AND PLANNING IN THE PANDEMIC. THE CASE ON UNICEN
title_fullStr UNIVERSITY POLITICS, MANAGMENT AND PLANNING IN THE PANDEMIC. THE CASE ON UNICEN
title_full_unstemmed UNIVERSITY POLITICS, MANAGMENT AND PLANNING IN THE PANDEMIC. THE CASE ON UNICEN
title_sort university politics, managment and planning in the pandemic. the case on unicen
description This article aims to continue the analyzes that we have been carrying out since the first year of the pandemic, recovering the contributions of references from the field of Situational Strategic Planning (PES) and higher education, in addition to systematizing documents and regulations of the National Interuniversity Council (CIN), of the Ministry of Education of Nation (ME) and from the Secretariat of University Policies (SPU) issued during the health emergency, a set of considerations are made explicit about the characteristics that the Argentine university system acquired, particularly at the National University of the Center of Province of Buenos Aires (UNICEN), in relation to the strategies and planning actions that its managers carried out to address the contingency. In this way, based on the same methodology and maintaining the axis of analysis described, the purpose of this document is to identify continuities and ruptures in the so-called “return to face-to –face” and, in the transition to the post-pandemic. To this end, the following questions are raised: ¿What were those responses in terms of university regulations and provisions to face the progressive return to in-person attendance in a pandemic context? ¿Were they reactive or planned responses? ¿What place does planning occupy in national universities, specifically in UNICEN, to be able to face this transition?
publisher Núcleo de Estudios e Investigaciones en Educación Superior del MERCOSUR
publishDate 2024
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/integracionyconocimiento/article/view/45909
work_keys_str_mv AT bianchinimarialaura universitypoliticsmanagmentandplanninginthepandemicthecaseonunicen
AT dimarcomariacecilia universitypoliticsmanagmentandplanninginthepandemicthecaseonunicen
AT bianchinimarialaura politicagestionyplaneamientouniversitarioenlapandemiaunestudiodecasounicen
AT dimarcomariacecilia politicagestionyplaneamientouniversitarioenlapandemiaunestudiodecasounicen
AT bianchinimarialaura politicagestaoeplanejamentouniversitarionapandemiaocasodaunicen
AT dimarcomariacecilia politicagestaoeplanejamentouniversitarionapandemiaocasodaunicen
first_indexed 2024-09-03T23:06:27Z
last_indexed 2025-02-05T22:24:02Z
_version_ 1823257912173133824
spelling I10-R376-article-459092024-08-01T23:30:37Z UNIVERSITY POLITICS, MANAGMENT AND PLANNING IN THE PANDEMIC. THE CASE ON UNICEN Política, gestión y planeamiento universitario en la pandemia. Un estudio de caso UNICEN. POLÍTICA, GESTÃO E PLANEJAMENTO UNIVERSITÁRIO NA PANDEMIA. O CASO DA UNICEN. Bianchini, María Laura Di Marco, María Cecilia University; Planning; Post Pandemic Universidad; Planeamiento; Post Pandemia Universidade; Planejamento; Pós Pandemia This article aims to continue the analyzes that we have been carrying out since the first year of the pandemic, recovering the contributions of references from the field of Situational Strategic Planning (PES) and higher education, in addition to systematizing documents and regulations of the National Interuniversity Council (CIN), of the Ministry of Education of Nation (ME) and from the Secretariat of University Policies (SPU) issued during the health emergency, a set of considerations are made explicit about the characteristics that the Argentine university system acquired, particularly at the National University of the Center of Province of Buenos Aires (UNICEN), in relation to the strategies and planning actions that its managers carried out to address the contingency. In this way, based on the same methodology and maintaining the axis of analysis described, the purpose of this document is to identify continuities and ruptures in the so-called “return to face-to –face” and, in the transition to the post-pandemic. To this end, the following questions are raised: ¿What were those responses in terms of university regulations and provisions to face the progressive return to in-person attendance in a pandemic context? ¿Were they reactive or planned responses? ¿What place does planning occupy in national universities, specifically in UNICEN, to be able to face this transition? Este artículo se propone dar continuidad a los análisis que venimos realizando desde el primer año de la pandemia, recuperando los aportes de referentes del campo del Planeamiento Estratégico Situacional (PES) y la educación superior. Además de sistematizar documentos y normativas del Consejo Interuniversitario Nacional (CIN), del Ministerio de Educación de la Nación (ME) y de la Secretaría de Políticas Universitarias (SPU) -emanados durante la emergencia sanitaria- se explicitan un conjunto de consideraciones acerca de las características que adquirió el sistema universitario argentino, particularmente en la Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNICEN), en lo relativo a las estrategias y acciones de planificación que sus gestores llevaron a cabo para abordar la contingencia. De este modo, a partir de la misma metodología y manteniendo el eje de análisis descrito, el presente escrito tiene como finalidad identificar continuidades y rupturas en la denominada “vuelta a la presencialidad” y en la transición hacia la post pandemia. Para ello se plantean los siguientes interrogantes: ¿Cuáles fueron esas respuestas en materia de normativas y disposiciones universitarias para afrontar en un contexto de pandemia la progresiva vuelta a la presencialidad? ¿Fueron respuestas reactivas o planificadas? ¿Qué lugar ocupa el planeamiento en las universidades nacionales, específicamente en la UNICEN, para poder hacer frente a esta transición?  Este artigo pretende dar continuidade às análise que temos vindo realizar desde o primeiro ano da pandemia, recuperando os contributos de referências do domínio do Planejamento Estratégico Situacional (PES) e do ensino superior. Além de sistematizar documentos e regulamentos do Conselho Interuniversitário Nacional (CIN), do Ministério da Educação da Nação (ME) e da Secretaria da Políticas Universitárias (SPU) emitidas durante a emergência sanitária, explicita-se um conjunto de considerações sobre as características que o sistema universitário argentino adquiriu, particularmente na Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNICEN), em relação às estratégias e ações de planejamento que seus gestores realizaram para enfrentar a contingência. Desta forma, com base na mesma metodología e mantendo o eixo de análise descrito, o objetivo deste documento é identificar continuidades e rupturas no chamado “retorno ao presencial” e, na transição para o pós-pandemia. Para tal, levantam-se as seguintes questões: ¿Quais foram essas respostas em termos de regulamentação e disposições universitárias para fazer face ao regresso progressivo ao atendimento presencial em contexto de pandemia? ¿Foram respostas reativas ou planejadas? ¿Qué lugar ocupa o planeamento nas universidades nacionais, especificamente na UNICEN, para poder enfrentar esta transição? Núcleo de Estudios e Investigaciones en Educación Superior del MERCOSUR 2024-08-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/integracionyconocimiento/article/view/45909 Integración y Conocimiento; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Integración y Conocimiento ; 127-143 Integración y Conocimiento; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2024): Integración y Conocimiento ; 127-143 Integración y Conocimiento; v. 13 n. 2 (2024): Integración y Conocimiento ; 127-143 2347-0658 10.61203/2347-0658.v13.n2 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/integracionyconocimiento/article/view/45909/46109 Derechos de autor 2024 Integración y Conocimiento https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Ejemplares similares