¿Manufacture, use and disposal? Or about the social entanglement of ceramic objects

If we think that things and objects are the result of a multidimensional bundle of actions and relationships, material or inmaterial, made by human and nonhuman agents, it is difficult to keep thinking about the materiality of objects and the archaeological record in terms of processes, as a series...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laguens, Andrés, Pazzarelli, Francisco
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/9142
Aporte de:
id I10-R372-article-9142
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R372-article-91422024-11-07T17:42:02Z ¿Manufacture, use and disposal? Or about the social entanglement of ceramic objects ¿Manufactura, uso y descarte? O acerca del entramado social de los objetos cerámicos Laguens, Andrés Pazzarelli, Francisco multidimensionalidad redes relaciones cerámica Ambato multidimensionality networks relationships pottery Ambato If we think that things and objects are the result of a multidimensional bundle of actions and relationships, material or inmaterial, made by human and nonhuman agents, it is difficult to keep thinking about the materiality of objects and the archaeological record in terms of processes, as a series of successive phases of actions or behaviors. These bundles between things and people are dynamics, steady flows of actions and relationships, where objects are constituted as a dynamic effect of this relationships, not in the sense of their causes but making effective a series of possibilities given by the strategies and the resources involved, the disposition of the agents involved and their position in social space. With these criteria, then we can not think of objects and their contexts as the result of actions (behaviors) and parts of a process, no longer exist a chain of behavior but a bundle of overlapping relationships, where each intersection is a place of mediation among many other actions and relationships. Through a situational and relational analysis of a set of pots from the Ambato Valley (Catamarca, Argentina) we show the potential of this approach for the study of ceramic technology, beyond their manufacturing, use and disposal. Si pensamos a las cosas y a los objetos como el resultado de un entramado multidimensional de acciones y relaciones, materiales e inmateriales, concretadas por agentes humanos y no humanos, resulta difícil seguir pensando a la materialidad de los objetos y del registro arqueológico en términos de procesos, como serie de fases sucesivas de acciones o conductas. Estos entramados entre las cosas y las personas son dinámicos, flujos constantes de acciones e interrelaciones, donde los objetos se constituyen como un efecto dinámico de las mismas; pero no en el sentido de sus causas, sino haciendo efectivas una serie de posibilidades dadas por las estrategias y los recursos puestos en juego, las disposiciones de los agentes participantes y su posición en un espacio social. Con estos criterios, no podemos pensar luego a los objetos y a sus contextos como el producto de acciones (conductas) y partes de un proceso, pues ya no existiría una cadena de comportamiento sino un fibrado de interrelaciones superpuestas, donde cada intersección es un lugar de mediación entre otras tantas acciones y relaciones. A través del análisis situacional y relacional de un conjunto de vasijas del Valle de Ambato (Catamarca, Argentina) mostraremos las potencialidades de un enfoque de este tipo para el estudio de la tecnología cerámica, más allá de sus procesos de manufactura, uso y descarte. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2011-12-24 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed article Artículo revisado por pares Artigo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/9142 10.31048/1852.4826.v4.n1.9142 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2011); 113-126 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2011); 113-126 Revista del Museo de Antropología; v. 4 n. 1 (2011); 113-126 1852-4826 1852-060X 10.31048/1852.4826.v4.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/9142/9896 Derechos de autor 2011 Andrés Laguens, Francisco Pazzarelli https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-372
container_title_str Revista del Museo de Antropología
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic multidimensionalidad
redes
relaciones
cerámica
Ambato
multidimensionality
networks
relationships
pottery
Ambato
spellingShingle multidimensionalidad
redes
relaciones
cerámica
Ambato
multidimensionality
networks
relationships
pottery
Ambato
Laguens, Andrés
Pazzarelli, Francisco
¿Manufacture, use and disposal? Or about the social entanglement of ceramic objects
topic_facet multidimensionalidad
redes
relaciones
cerámica
Ambato
multidimensionality
networks
relationships
pottery
Ambato
author Laguens, Andrés
Pazzarelli, Francisco
author_facet Laguens, Andrés
Pazzarelli, Francisco
author_sort Laguens, Andrés
title ¿Manufacture, use and disposal? Or about the social entanglement of ceramic objects
title_short ¿Manufacture, use and disposal? Or about the social entanglement of ceramic objects
title_full ¿Manufacture, use and disposal? Or about the social entanglement of ceramic objects
title_fullStr ¿Manufacture, use and disposal? Or about the social entanglement of ceramic objects
title_full_unstemmed ¿Manufacture, use and disposal? Or about the social entanglement of ceramic objects
title_sort ¿manufacture, use and disposal? or about the social entanglement of ceramic objects
description If we think that things and objects are the result of a multidimensional bundle of actions and relationships, material or inmaterial, made by human and nonhuman agents, it is difficult to keep thinking about the materiality of objects and the archaeological record in terms of processes, as a series of successive phases of actions or behaviors. These bundles between things and people are dynamics, steady flows of actions and relationships, where objects are constituted as a dynamic effect of this relationships, not in the sense of their causes but making effective a series of possibilities given by the strategies and the resources involved, the disposition of the agents involved and their position in social space. With these criteria, then we can not think of objects and their contexts as the result of actions (behaviors) and parts of a process, no longer exist a chain of behavior but a bundle of overlapping relationships, where each intersection is a place of mediation among many other actions and relationships. Through a situational and relational analysis of a set of pots from the Ambato Valley (Catamarca, Argentina) we show the potential of this approach for the study of ceramic technology, beyond their manufacturing, use and disposal.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología
publishDate 2011
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/9142
work_keys_str_mv AT laguensandres manufactureuseanddisposaloraboutthesocialentanglementofceramicobjects
AT pazzarellifrancisco manufactureuseanddisposaloraboutthesocialentanglementofceramicobjects
AT laguensandres manufacturausoydescarteoacercadelentramadosocialdelosobjetosceramicos
AT pazzarellifrancisco manufacturausoydescarteoacercadelentramadosocialdelosobjetosceramicos
first_indexed 2024-09-03T20:02:14Z
last_indexed 2025-03-27T05:34:11Z
_version_ 1827724225788510208