Science and intellectual notoriety in Norbert Elias. Autobiographical reflections of my intellectual trajectory

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

The trajectory of one the most important authors of social sciences in the 20th century, Norbert Elias, is not only interesting by itself but also exhibits some complex and salient aspects which allow us to analyze the dynamics of academic fields. In fact, the peculiarities of his work and the late...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gil, Gastón Julián
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2015
Materias:
academic field
My intellectual path
anthropology
anthropologists
campo académico
Mi trayectoria intelectual
antropología
antropólogos
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/13234
Aporte de:
Revista del Museo de Antropología de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R372-article-13234
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R372-article-132342024-11-04T18:45:07Z Science and intellectual notoriety in Norbert Elias. Autobiographical reflections of my intellectual trajectory Ciencia y notoriedad intelectual en Norbert Elias. Reflexiones autobiográficas de mi trayectoria intelectual Gil, Gastón Julián academic field My intellectual path anthropology anthropologists campo académico Mi trayectoria intelectual antropología antropólogos The trajectory of one the most important authors of social sciences in the 20th century, Norbert Elias, is not only interesting by itself but also exhibits some complex and salient aspects which allow us to analyze the dynamics of academic fields. In fact, the peculiarities of his work and the late acknowledgment that it received within the field of social sciences are fruitful sources which enable us to question the ways by means of which academic leaderships are consolidated (together with their dense disciplinary networks), and, on the other hand, they also enable us to understand how other productions are located in the margins of the discipline. In this article, the autobiographical work written by Elias will be compared to some situations in the anthropological field in Argentina, which are related to leaderships, theoretical ruptures, disciplinary controversies, and institutional projects. This comparative task will be developed in two different contexts: the central and the peripheral ones. These two contexts provide, by means of analogy and contrast, relevant data for the study of social sciences. La trayectoria de un autor fundamental para las ciencias sociales del siglo XX, como es el caso de Norbert Elias, no sólo presenta un interés en sí misma sino que además ofrece ricas aristas para reflexionar acerca de la dinámica de los campos académicos. En efecto, las particularidades de su obra y el tardío reconocimiento que obtuvo en el campo de las ciencias sociales operan como fuentes fructíferas para problematizar el modo en que se instauran los liderazgos académicos (con sus consecuentes densas redes disciplinares) y, como contrapartida, se arrojan otras producciones a los márgenes disciplinares. En este artículo se toma la obra carácter autobiográfica de Elias, Mi trayectoria intelectual, para contrastarla con algunas situaciones del campo antropológico argentino vinculadas con liderazgos, rupturas teóricas, controversias disciplinares y proyectos institucionales. Se trata entonces de un ejercicio comparativo que navega entre dos diferentes contextos (uno central y el otro periférico) que, por analogía y contraste, nos ofrecen datos de relieve para un abordaje reflexivo de las ciencias sociales. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2015-12-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/13234 10.31048/1852.4826.v8.n2.13234 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2015); 201-208 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2015); 201-208 Revista del Museo de Antropología; v. 8 n. 2 (2015); 201-208 1852-4826 1852-060X 10.31048/1852.4826.v8.n2 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/13234/13466 Derechos de autor 2015 Gastón Julián Gil
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-372
container_title_str Revista del Museo de Antropología
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic academic field
My intellectual path
anthropology
anthropologists
campo académico
Mi trayectoria intelectual
antropología
antropólogos
spellingShingle academic field
My intellectual path
anthropology
anthropologists
campo académico
Mi trayectoria intelectual
antropología
antropólogos
Gil, Gastón Julián
Science and intellectual notoriety in Norbert Elias. Autobiographical reflections of my intellectual trajectory
topic_facet academic field
My intellectual path
anthropology
anthropologists
campo académico
Mi trayectoria intelectual
antropología
antropólogos
author Gil, Gastón Julián
author_facet Gil, Gastón Julián
author_sort Gil, Gastón Julián
title Science and intellectual notoriety in Norbert Elias. Autobiographical reflections of my intellectual trajectory
title_short Science and intellectual notoriety in Norbert Elias. Autobiographical reflections of my intellectual trajectory
title_full Science and intellectual notoriety in Norbert Elias. Autobiographical reflections of my intellectual trajectory
title_fullStr Science and intellectual notoriety in Norbert Elias. Autobiographical reflections of my intellectual trajectory
title_full_unstemmed Science and intellectual notoriety in Norbert Elias. Autobiographical reflections of my intellectual trajectory
title_sort science and intellectual notoriety in norbert elias. autobiographical reflections of my intellectual trajectory
description The trajectory of one the most important authors of social sciences in the 20th century, Norbert Elias, is not only interesting by itself but also exhibits some complex and salient aspects which allow us to analyze the dynamics of academic fields. In fact, the peculiarities of his work and the late acknowledgment that it received within the field of social sciences are fruitful sources which enable us to question the ways by means of which academic leaderships are consolidated (together with their dense disciplinary networks), and, on the other hand, they also enable us to understand how other productions are located in the margins of the discipline. In this article, the autobiographical work written by Elias will be compared to some situations in the anthropological field in Argentina, which are related to leaderships, theoretical ruptures, disciplinary controversies, and institutional projects. This comparative task will be developed in two different contexts: the central and the peripheral ones. These two contexts provide, by means of analogy and contrast, relevant data for the study of social sciences.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología
publishDate 2015
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/13234
work_keys_str_mv AT gilgastonjulian scienceandintellectualnotorietyinnorberteliasautobiographicalreflectionsofmyintellectualtrajectory
AT gilgastonjulian cienciaynotoriedadintelectualennorberteliasreflexionesautobiograficasdemitrayectoriaintelectual
first_indexed 2024-09-03T20:00:56Z
last_indexed 2025-03-27T05:32:21Z
_version_ 1827724109981679616

Ejemplares similares