Categories of analysis to evaluate technical appropriation in technological linkage projects: the case of the headquarters of the Tucuman peasant association

In the context of technological linkage processes for habitat improvement, the co-construction of knowledge, and its appropriation, acquire fundamental relevance. This study presents the analysis of the construction of a building of the headquarters of the Tucumán Peasant Association with light eart...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García Villar, Gonzalo, Dorado, Pablo, Rolón, Guillermo
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/42567
Aporte de:
Descripción
Sumario:In the context of technological linkage processes for habitat improvement, the co-construction of knowledge, and its appropriation, acquire fundamental relevance. This study presents the analysis of the construction of a building of the headquarters of the Tucumán Peasant Association with light earth and earthen plaster techniques. The objective of this study lies in proposing a series of implementation categories that allow evaluating the level of assimilation (or appropriation) of construction techniques. To do this, information was obtained through interviews with key actors and surveys of the participants of the activities, where their perspectives on the process, the product and the forms of organization were recorded. Four categories were proposed to characterize the process of appropriation of techniques: independence, reformulation, transmission and technical appreciation. The training of the technicians and those carried out internally among members of the association, the reformulations of the construction techniques, and their organizational capacity around construction set the tone for significant learning of new skills and assimilation of the proposed construction techniques, that return to the research team in the construction of a future research agenda.