ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?

Recent texts which were published by architects of Córdoba allow for a reflection on the relationship between writing and architecture. In the first place, this article offers an hermeneutical reconstruction of both terms, and it finds in the signifier “text” a point of departure for their relations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fonti, Diego
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño 2017
Materias:
Escritura
Arquitectura
Legitimidad
Crítica
Writing
Architecture
Legitimacy
Critique
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/19013
Aporte de:
PENSUM de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R371-article-19013
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R371-article-190132019-11-04T16:32:56Z ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK? Arquitectura y escritura Acerca de la pregunta ¿por qué escribir es parte del trabajo arquitectónico? Fonti, Diego Escritura Arquitectura Legitimidad Crítica Writing Architecture Legitimacy Critique Recent texts which were published by architects of Córdoba allow for a reflection on the relationship between writing and architecture. In the first place, this article offers an hermeneutical reconstruction of both terms, and it finds in the signifier “text” a point of departure for their relationship. After this, three historically influential models of writing about architecture are identified: classicist deontologism, pragmatic deontologism and critical tradition. Following the analysis of the structure and leading ideas of each one of them, the most meaningful transversal issues are identified: modernity, city, pedagogy esthetics and subjectivity. These issues represent at the same time a reception and an attempt at overcoming the models exposed Recientes textos publicados por profesionales de la arquitectura en el contexto de Córdoba permiten una reflexión sobre la relación de la escritura con la arquitectura. En primer lugar, este artículo ofrece una reconstrucción hermenéutica de ambos términos, encontrando en el significante “texto” un punto de partida para su vinculación. A continuación, se identifican tres modelos históricamente influyentes de escritura sobre la arquitectura: el dentologismo clasicista, el deontologismo pragmatista y la tradición crítica. Luego de analizar la estructura e ideas rectoras de cada uno de ellos, se indagan los núcleos más significativos de la escritura de arquitectos y arquitectas de nuestro medio, identificando cinco núcleos temáticos transversales: modernidad, ciudad, pedagogía estética y subjetividad. Estos núcleos representan, al mismo tiempo, una recepción y un intento de superación de los modelos expuestos Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño 2017-12-27 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/19013 10.59047/2469.0724.v3.n3.19013 PENSUM; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2017) 2469-0724 10.59047/2469.0724.v3.n3 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/19013/18931 Derechos de autor 2017 Diego Fonti
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-371
container_title_str PENSUM
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Escritura
Arquitectura
Legitimidad
Crítica
Writing
Architecture
Legitimacy
Critique
spellingShingle Escritura
Arquitectura
Legitimidad
Crítica
Writing
Architecture
Legitimacy
Critique
Fonti, Diego
ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
topic_facet Escritura
Arquitectura
Legitimidad
Crítica
Writing
Architecture
Legitimacy
Critique
author Fonti, Diego
author_facet Fonti, Diego
author_sort Fonti, Diego
title ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
title_short ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
title_full ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
title_fullStr ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
title_full_unstemmed ARCHITECTURE AND WRITING ABOUT THE QUESTION, WHY IS WRITING PART OF ARCHITECTURAL WORK?
title_sort architecture and writing about the question, why is writing part of architectural work?
description Recent texts which were published by architects of Córdoba allow for a reflection on the relationship between writing and architecture. In the first place, this article offers an hermeneutical reconstruction of both terms, and it finds in the signifier “text” a point of departure for their relationship. After this, three historically influential models of writing about architecture are identified: classicist deontologism, pragmatic deontologism and critical tradition. Following the analysis of the structure and leading ideas of each one of them, the most meaningful transversal issues are identified: modernity, city, pedagogy esthetics and subjectivity. These issues represent at the same time a reception and an attempt at overcoming the models exposed
publisher Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño
publishDate 2017
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/19013
work_keys_str_mv AT fontidiego architectureandwritingaboutthequestionwhyiswritingpartofarchitecturalwork
AT fontidiego arquitecturayescrituraacercadelapreguntaporqueescribirespartedeltrabajoarquitectonico
first_indexed 2024-09-03T23:00:24Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T23:00:24Z
_version_ 1809217670154813440

Ejemplares similares