Housing strategies and implementations by the Chilean State, 1965-1985
Between 1965 and 1985, the housing strategies and implementations formulated by the Chilean State were discussed along three different political lines, establishing conceptual, formal and urban plans related to their perspectives. During the mandate of Eduardo Frei (1965-1970), the problems derived...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RIHALC/article/view/45175 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Between 1965 and 1985, the housing strategies and implementations formulated by the Chilean State were discussed along three different political lines, establishing conceptual, formal and urban plans related to their perspectives. During the mandate of Eduardo Frei (1965-1970), the problems derived from migration had repercussions in the cities, and the institutions focused on solving the problems of overcrowding and encampments, but continued the implementations of “Urban Remodeling”. In the following government of Salvador Allende (1970-1973), the political crisis would worsen and there was an increase in land seizures, as a system of struggle towards the acquisition of housing. The State carried out relevant actions, revitalizing the Housing Corporations and others to solve the deficit. Finally, with the coup d'état perpetrated by Augusto Pinochet (1973), the housing problem would be compounded by the reduction of the state apparatus, so that housing actions would be mainly mediated and executed mostly by the private sector, losing the developmentalist approach sought by previous governments. The purpose of this review is to examine the application of concepts and measures, as well as the main executions in housing matters, which were distinctive to each political stage and how they facilitated or hindered the development of housing as a key agency in urban construction. |
|---|