Hegemony and accumulation: transformism and financial valorization of capital in Eduardo Basualdo's analysis
The specific forms assumed by the articulation between consensus and coercion within the development of the regime of accumulation by financial valorization in Argentina (1976-2001), is one of the central problems and questions that go through our recent history. Based on previous research advances,...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RIHALC/article/view/26477 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R364-article-26477 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R364-article-264772020-02-13T20:58:14Z Hegemony and accumulation: transformism and financial valorization of capital in Eduardo Basualdo's analysis Hegemonía y acumulación: transformismo y valorización financiera del capital en el análisis de Eduardo Basualdo Gerchunoff, Santiago Hegemonía y acumulación Transformismo Valorización financiera The specific forms assumed by the articulation between consensus and coercion within the development of the regime of accumulation by financial valorization in Argentina (1976-2001), is one of the central problems and questions that go through our recent history. Based on previous research advances, we will try to contribute to the still unfinished task of reconstructing in depth the evolution, occurred since the last civil-military dictatorship, of those devices oriented to the construction of consensus and hegemony. In general, and as in Eduardo Basualdo's interpretation –structured around the translation of the Gramscian concept of transformationism– the ideological dimension, and especially the role of intellectuals and experts - occupy a secondary place. However, as we will try to discuss in this work, the study of the devices (essentially discursive) constructed by neoliberal economists assumes a significant importance at the moment of understanding how financial valorization - essentially excluding accumulation regime in social terms - achieved social and political sustainability from the democratic period initiated in 1983. Las formas específicas que asumió la articulación entre consenso y coerción al interior del desarrollo del régimen de acumulación por valorización financiera en Argentina (1976-2001), es uno de los problemas e interrogantes centrales que atraviesan nuestra historia reciente. A partir de los avances previos de investigación, intentaremos aportar a la aún inconclusa tarea de reconstruir en profundidad la evolución, ocurrida desde la última dictadura cívico-militar, de aquellos dispositivos orientados a la construcción de consenso y hegemonía. En general, y como ocurre en la interpretación de Eduardo Basualdo -estructurada en torno a la traducción del concepto gramsciano de transformismo- la dimensión ideológica, y en especial el rol de intelectuales y expertos- ocupan un lugar secundario. Sin embargo, según intentaremos argumentar en este trabajo, el estudio de los dispositivos (esencialmente discursivos) construidos por los economistas neoliberales, asume una importancia significativa al momento de comprender de qué modo la valorización financiera –régimen de acumulación esencialmente excluyente en términos sociales– logró sustentabilidad social y política a partir del período democrático iniciado en 1983. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia 2019-12-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RIHALC/article/view/26477 Journal Red Intercátedras de Historia de América Latina Contemporánea ; No. 11 (2019): Revista de la Red Intercátedras de Historia de América Latina Contemporánea. December 2019-May 2020; 1-19 Revista de la Red Intercátedras de Historia de América Latina Contemporánea; Núm. 11 (2019): Revista de la Red Intercátedras de Historia de América Latina Contemporánea. Diciembre 2019-Mayo 2020; 1-19 Revista da Rede Intercátedras de História Contemporânea da América Latina ; n. 11 (2019): Revista de la Red Intercátedras de Historia de América Latina Contemporánea. Dezembro 2019-Maio 2020; 1-19 2250-7264 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RIHALC/article/view/26477/28366 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-364 |
| container_title_str |
Revista de la Red Intercátedras de Historia de América Latina Contemporánea |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Hegemonía y acumulación Transformismo Valorización financiera |
| spellingShingle |
Hegemonía y acumulación Transformismo Valorización financiera Gerchunoff, Santiago Hegemony and accumulation: transformism and financial valorization of capital in Eduardo Basualdo's analysis |
| topic_facet |
Hegemonía y acumulación Transformismo Valorización financiera |
| author |
Gerchunoff, Santiago |
| author_facet |
Gerchunoff, Santiago |
| author_sort |
Gerchunoff, Santiago |
| title |
Hegemony and accumulation: transformism and financial valorization of capital in Eduardo Basualdo's analysis |
| title_short |
Hegemony and accumulation: transformism and financial valorization of capital in Eduardo Basualdo's analysis |
| title_full |
Hegemony and accumulation: transformism and financial valorization of capital in Eduardo Basualdo's analysis |
| title_fullStr |
Hegemony and accumulation: transformism and financial valorization of capital in Eduardo Basualdo's analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Hegemony and accumulation: transformism and financial valorization of capital in Eduardo Basualdo's analysis |
| title_sort |
hegemony and accumulation: transformism and financial valorization of capital in eduardo basualdo's analysis |
| description |
The specific forms assumed by the articulation between consensus and coercion within the development of the regime of accumulation by financial valorization in Argentina (1976-2001), is one of the central problems and questions that go through our recent history. Based on previous research advances, we will try to contribute to the still unfinished task of reconstructing in depth the evolution, occurred since the last civil-military dictatorship, of those devices oriented to the construction of consensus and hegemony. In general, and as in Eduardo Basualdo's interpretation –structured around the translation of the Gramscian concept of transformationism– the ideological dimension, and especially the role of intellectuals and experts - occupy a secondary place. However, as we will try to discuss in this work, the study of the devices (essentially discursive) constructed by neoliberal economists assumes a significant importance at the moment of understanding how financial valorization - essentially excluding accumulation regime in social terms - achieved social and political sustainability from the democratic period initiated in 1983. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RIHALC/article/view/26477 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT gerchunoffsantiago hegemonyandaccumulationtransformismandfinancialvalorizationofcapitalineduardobasualdosanalysis AT gerchunoffsantiago hegemoniayacumulaciontransformismoyvalorizacionfinancieradelcapitalenelanalisisdeeduardobasualdo |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:55:33Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:55:33Z |
| _version_ |
1809217364391100416 |