Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism
This article is dedicated to the analysis of the idea of temporality embedded in Reinhart Koselleck’s Historik in light of the theoretical discussion around the interpretive but also political consequences born by different philosophies of history, more or less tacitly contained in proposals which...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18809 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R362-article-18809 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R362-article-188092017-12-12T22:02:38Z Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism El tiempo en la Historik. Ensayo de crítica historiográfica Gay, María Eugenia Historik Tiempo Teoría de la Historia Historik Time Theory of History This article is dedicated to the analysis of the idea of temporality embedded in Reinhart Koselleck’s Historik in light of the theoretical discussion around the interpretive but also political consequences born by different philosophies of history, more or less tacitly contained in proposals which present themselves as purely methodological and endorse the criteria of objectivity and the scientific nature of historical practice. With base on Koselleck’s theoretical texts and on his debate with two of his greatest teachers, Hans-Georg Gadamer and Martin Heidegger, we propose a reading of Historik’s philosophy of history and a reflexion on its advantages and disadvantages for the challenges of contemporary historiography. Este artículo está dedicado a analizar la concepción de la temporalidad en la Historik de Reinhart Koselleck a la luz de la discusión teórica sobre las consecuencias interpretativas pero también políticas de las diferentes filosofías de la historia contenidas más o menos tácitamente en propuestas que se pretenden puramente metodológicas y sostienen los criterios de objetividad y cientificidad de la práctica histórica. Con base en los textos teóricos de Koselleck y en sus discusiones con dos de sus grandes maestros, Hans-Georg Gadamer y Martin Heidegger, se propone una lectura de la filosofía de la historia de la Historik y una reflexión sobre sus ventajas y desventajas para el tratamiento de los desafíos de la historiografía actual. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia 2017-12-12 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18809 10.31049/1853.7049.v0.n12.18809 Anuario de la Escuela de Historia Virtual; Núm. 12 (2017); 1-20 1853-7049 10.31049/1853.7049.v0.n12 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18809/18664 Derechos de autor 2017 María Eugenia Gay |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-362 |
| container_title_str |
Anuario de la Escuela de Historia Virtual |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Historik Tiempo Teoría de la Historia Historik Time Theory of History |
| spellingShingle |
Historik Tiempo Teoría de la Historia Historik Time Theory of History Gay, María Eugenia Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| topic_facet |
Historik Tiempo Teoría de la Historia Historik Time Theory of History |
| author |
Gay, María Eugenia |
| author_facet |
Gay, María Eugenia |
| author_sort |
Gay, María Eugenia |
| title |
Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| title_short |
Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| title_full |
Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| title_fullStr |
Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| title_sort |
time in historik. essay of historiographical criticism |
| description |
This article is dedicated to the analysis of the idea of temporality embedded in Reinhart Koselleck’s Historik in light of the theoretical discussion around the interpretive but also political consequences born by different philosophies of history, more or less tacitly contained in proposals which present themselves as purely methodological and endorse the criteria of objectivity and the scientific nature of historical practice. With base on Koselleck’s theoretical texts and on his debate with two of his greatest teachers, Hans-Georg Gadamer and Martin Heidegger, we propose a reading of Historik’s philosophy of history and a reflexion on its advantages and disadvantages for the challenges of contemporary historiography. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18809 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT gaymariaeugenia timeinhistorikessayofhistoriographicalcriticism AT gaymariaeugenia eltiempoenlahistorikensayodecriticahistoriografica |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:29:07Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:29:07Z |
| _version_ |
1809215701950398464 |