The bibliographical review as an educational experience

Aims: To compare the difficulties faced by students when performing bibliographical review tasks, in the years 2005 and 2006Materials and Methods: Year 2005: 57 groups, N = 218; year 2006: 40 groups, N = 180. Aspects analyzed: a) Means of access to sources, sources accessed and search strategies emp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butinof, Mariana, Eandi, Mariana, Acosta, Laura, Barale, Adrián, Huergo, Juliana, Haulet, Cecilia, Sabulsky, Jacobo
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Escuela de Salud Pública y Ambiente. Fac. Cs. Médicas UNC 2014
Materias:
bibliographical review
Internet
monograph
research methodology
publich health students
Revisión Bibliográfica
Monografía
Metodología de la Investigación
Estudiantes del Área De La Salud
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/7241
Aporte de:
Revista de Salud Pública de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R360-article-7241
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R360-article-72412025-04-03T12:07:14Z The bibliographical review as an educational experience La revisión bibliografica, una experiencia educativa Butinof, Mariana Eandi, Mariana Acosta, Laura Barale, Adrián Huergo, Juliana Haulet, Cecilia Sabulsky, Jacobo bibliographical review Internet monograph research methodology publich health students Revisión Bibliográfica Internet Monografía Metodología de la Investigación Estudiantes del Área De La Salud Aims: To compare the difficulties faced by students when performing bibliographical review tasks, in the years 2005 and 2006Materials and Methods: Year 2005: 57 groups, N = 218; year 2006: 40 groups, N = 180. Aspects analyzed: a) Means of access to sources, sources accessed and search strategies employed; b) Structure of the review; c) Clarity of writing, handling of references in text and bibliography.Results: In 2005, 78 % of students performed combined searches (Internet and manuals). In 2006, only 52,5 % performed such searches. 49% performed searches in bibliographical data bases, which diminished to 37,5 % in 2006, whereas searches in other languages was 24% and 12,5% respectively. There was an increase in the use of search engines, statements of search criteria and references to key words employed.In 2006 there was an improvement in the statement of problems, objectives, hypothesis and coherence between these aspects.In both years, 20% of works employed the quotation and bibliographical reference formats suggested by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).Conclusions: The main difficulties emerged in the handling and incorporation of quotations and bibliographical references. In 2006 there was a tendency to make search strategies explicit. The use of foreign languages poses a limitation. Objetivo: comparar de manera cuali-cuantitativa las dificultades que enfrentan los estudiantes para elaborar un trabajo de revisión bibliográfica; en los años 2005 y 2006. Materiales y métodos: Año 2005: 57 grupos N= 218; año 2006 40 grupos N=180. Se analizó: a) Medios de acceso a la información, fuentes consultadas y estrategia de búsqueda implementada; b) Estructura del trabajo de revisión c) Claridad de la redacción, manejo de referencias en el texto y en la bibliografía. Resultados: Enel año2005el78%de los estudiantes accedió a búsquedas combinadas (tanto en internet como manuales). Enelaño2006,sólo accedió el 52,5%.El49%realizó búsquedas en bases de datos bibliográficas, en el año 2006 fue menor (37,5 %); al igual que la consulta en otros idiomas (24%y12,5% respectivamente).Aumentóla utilización de motores de búsqueda, la especificación de los criterios de búsqueda y la referencia a las palabras claves utilizadas) Seobservó una mejor performance en el año2006en relación al planteamiento del problema, objetivo/s, hipótesis y coherencia entre estos elementos. En ambos periodos, el 20% de los trabajos utilizaron el formato de cita y referencia bibliográfica sugerido por el Comité Internacional de Editores de Revistas Médicas. Conclusiones: Las mayores dificultades se presentaron en el manejo de incorporación de citas y referencia bibliográficas. En el año 2006, mejoró la explicitación de la estrategia de búsqueda. La utilización de otros idiomas aparece como un limitante. Escuela de Salud Pública y Ambiente. Fac. Cs. Médicas UNC 2014-04-09 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/7241 10.31052/1853.1180.v11.n1.7241 Revista de Salud Pública; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2007); 64-69 1852-9429 1853-1180 10.31052/1853.1180.v11.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/7241/8331 Derechos de autor 1969 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-360
container_title_str Revista de Salud Pública
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic bibliographical review
Internet
monograph
research methodology
publich health students
Revisión Bibliográfica
Internet
Monografía
Metodología de la Investigación
Estudiantes del Área De La Salud
spellingShingle bibliographical review
Internet
monograph
research methodology
publich health students
Revisión Bibliográfica
Internet
Monografía
Metodología de la Investigación
Estudiantes del Área De La Salud
Butinof, Mariana
Eandi, Mariana
Acosta, Laura
Barale, Adrián
Huergo, Juliana
Haulet, Cecilia
Sabulsky, Jacobo
The bibliographical review as an educational experience
topic_facet bibliographical review
Internet
monograph
research methodology
publich health students
Revisión Bibliográfica
Internet
Monografía
Metodología de la Investigación
Estudiantes del Área De La Salud
author Butinof, Mariana
Eandi, Mariana
Acosta, Laura
Barale, Adrián
Huergo, Juliana
Haulet, Cecilia
Sabulsky, Jacobo
author_facet Butinof, Mariana
Eandi, Mariana
Acosta, Laura
Barale, Adrián
Huergo, Juliana
Haulet, Cecilia
Sabulsky, Jacobo
author_sort Butinof, Mariana
title The bibliographical review as an educational experience
title_short The bibliographical review as an educational experience
title_full The bibliographical review as an educational experience
title_fullStr The bibliographical review as an educational experience
title_full_unstemmed The bibliographical review as an educational experience
title_sort bibliographical review as an educational experience
description Aims: To compare the difficulties faced by students when performing bibliographical review tasks, in the years 2005 and 2006Materials and Methods: Year 2005: 57 groups, N = 218; year 2006: 40 groups, N = 180. Aspects analyzed: a) Means of access to sources, sources accessed and search strategies employed; b) Structure of the review; c) Clarity of writing, handling of references in text and bibliography.Results: In 2005, 78 % of students performed combined searches (Internet and manuals). In 2006, only 52,5 % performed such searches. 49% performed searches in bibliographical data bases, which diminished to 37,5 % in 2006, whereas searches in other languages was 24% and 12,5% respectively. There was an increase in the use of search engines, statements of search criteria and references to key words employed.In 2006 there was an improvement in the statement of problems, objectives, hypothesis and coherence between these aspects.In both years, 20% of works employed the quotation and bibliographical reference formats suggested by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).Conclusions: The main difficulties emerged in the handling and incorporation of quotations and bibliographical references. In 2006 there was a tendency to make search strategies explicit. The use of foreign languages poses a limitation.
publisher Escuela de Salud Pública y Ambiente. Fac. Cs. Médicas UNC
publishDate 2014
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/7241
work_keys_str_mv AT butinofmariana thebibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT eandimariana thebibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT acostalaura thebibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT baraleadrian thebibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT huergojuliana thebibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT hauletcecilia thebibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT sabulskyjacobo thebibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT butinofmariana larevisionbibliograficaunaexperienciaeducativa
AT eandimariana larevisionbibliograficaunaexperienciaeducativa
AT acostalaura larevisionbibliograficaunaexperienciaeducativa
AT baraleadrian larevisionbibliograficaunaexperienciaeducativa
AT huergojuliana larevisionbibliograficaunaexperienciaeducativa
AT hauletcecilia larevisionbibliograficaunaexperienciaeducativa
AT sabulskyjacobo larevisionbibliograficaunaexperienciaeducativa
AT butinofmariana bibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT eandimariana bibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT acostalaura bibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT baraleadrian bibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT huergojuliana bibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT hauletcecilia bibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
AT sabulskyjacobo bibliographicalreviewasaneducationalexperience
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:25:46Z
last_indexed 2025-05-10T05:21:04Z
_version_ 1841584802041430016

Ejemplares similares