Más allá de la pandemia. Luchas y Debates en torno al Estado y la Administración Pública.

This article aims to investigate the consequences of the pandemic on the vision that different schools have on state management models. Although in recent years the State has occupied a relevant space in the reflection of Social Sciences in general and Political Science in particular, the debate has...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreira Slepoy, Javier, Cao, Horacio
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública (IIFAP-FCS-UNC) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/35630
Aporte de:
id I10-R357-article-35630
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R357-article-356302023-09-01T15:18:55Z Más allá de la pandemia. Luchas y Debates en torno al Estado y la Administración Pública. Moreira Slepoy, Javier Cao, Horacio PANDEMIC - STATE - PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION- NEOLIBERALISM- POPULISM Pandemia Estado Administración Pública Neoliberalismo Populismo This article aims to investigate the consequences of the pandemic on the vision that different schools have on state management models. Although in recent years the State has occupied a relevant space in the reflection of Social Sciences in general and Political Science in particular, the debate has tended to focus on the political dimension, while the scope of State action, With some honorable exceptions, it has not been considered with the same intensity. This is particularly relevant at the present time, when the global COVID 19 pandemic has revolutionized the practices of the Public Sector, generating transformations and rearrangements whose consequences are still difficult to discern. Aimed, then, to make a description of the different perspectives with which state management is envisaged in the post-pandemic, we divide this text into five chapters.In the first one, we succinctly address the pandemic, which, we consider, should be understood as a constitutive event that will have an impact on the future of the global political order. In a second moment we deploy our conceptual base: what are the theoretical keys that guide this writing. In the third part we deepen the idea according to which States have acquired a new social role but whose meanings are crossed by different theoretical interpretations and, fundamentally, different political horizons. In the fourth section we will describe the five political speeches that, according to our analysis, have been consolidated as ways of seeing the state in the face of the pandemic. In the fifth and final section, we review the different management approaches derived from the five discourses that we cited in the previous chapter. Finally, we close the article with a few brief words as a conclusion.   El presente artículo se propone indagar sobre las consecuencias de la pandemia sobre los modelos de gestión estatal. Se trata de una temática que, entendemos, debería tener creciente importancia en los estudios de la academia, en las visiones y perspectivas profesionales y en los discursos políticos. Si bien en los últimos años el Estado ha ocupado un espacio relevante en la reflexión de las Ciencias Sociales en general y de la Ciencia Política en particular, el debate ha tendido a centrarse en la cuestión del poder y en lo institucional -como reglas de juego-mientras que el ámbito del accionar del Estado, salvo honrosas excepciones, no ha sido considerado con la misma intensidad. Esto es particularmente relevante en el momento actual, cuando la pandemia del COVID 19 ha revolucionado las prácticas del Sector Público, generando transformaciones y reacomodamientos cuyas consecuencias aún son difíciles de discernir. Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública (IIFAP-FCS-UNC) 2021-12-15 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/35630 Administración Pública y Sociedad (APyS); Núm. 12 (2021): Julio - Diciembre; 91-119 2524-9568 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/35630/36284 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/35630/36286 Derechos de autor 2021 Javier Moreira Slepoy, Horacio Cao http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-357
container_title_str Administración Pública y Sociedad (APyS)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic PANDEMIC - STATE - PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION- NEOLIBERALISM- POPULISM
Pandemia
Estado
Administración Pública
Neoliberalismo
Populismo
spellingShingle PANDEMIC - STATE - PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION- NEOLIBERALISM- POPULISM
Pandemia
Estado
Administración Pública
Neoliberalismo
Populismo
Moreira Slepoy, Javier
Cao, Horacio
Más allá de la pandemia. Luchas y Debates en torno al Estado y la Administración Pública.
topic_facet PANDEMIC - STATE - PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION- NEOLIBERALISM- POPULISM
Pandemia
Estado
Administración Pública
Neoliberalismo
Populismo
author Moreira Slepoy, Javier
Cao, Horacio
author_facet Moreira Slepoy, Javier
Cao, Horacio
author_sort Moreira Slepoy, Javier
title Más allá de la pandemia. Luchas y Debates en torno al Estado y la Administración Pública.
title_short Más allá de la pandemia. Luchas y Debates en torno al Estado y la Administración Pública.
title_full Más allá de la pandemia. Luchas y Debates en torno al Estado y la Administración Pública.
title_fullStr Más allá de la pandemia. Luchas y Debates en torno al Estado y la Administración Pública.
title_full_unstemmed Más allá de la pandemia. Luchas y Debates en torno al Estado y la Administración Pública.
title_sort más allá de la pandemia. luchas y debates en torno al estado y la administración pública.
description This article aims to investigate the consequences of the pandemic on the vision that different schools have on state management models. Although in recent years the State has occupied a relevant space in the reflection of Social Sciences in general and Political Science in particular, the debate has tended to focus on the political dimension, while the scope of State action, With some honorable exceptions, it has not been considered with the same intensity. This is particularly relevant at the present time, when the global COVID 19 pandemic has revolutionized the practices of the Public Sector, generating transformations and rearrangements whose consequences are still difficult to discern. Aimed, then, to make a description of the different perspectives with which state management is envisaged in the post-pandemic, we divide this text into five chapters.In the first one, we succinctly address the pandemic, which, we consider, should be understood as a constitutive event that will have an impact on the future of the global political order. In a second moment we deploy our conceptual base: what are the theoretical keys that guide this writing. In the third part we deepen the idea according to which States have acquired a new social role but whose meanings are crossed by different theoretical interpretations and, fundamentally, different political horizons. In the fourth section we will describe the five political speeches that, according to our analysis, have been consolidated as ways of seeing the state in the face of the pandemic. In the fifth and final section, we review the different management approaches derived from the five discourses that we cited in the previous chapter. Finally, we close the article with a few brief words as a conclusion.  
publisher Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública (IIFAP-FCS-UNC)
publishDate 2021
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/35630
work_keys_str_mv AT moreiraslepoyjavier masalladelapandemialuchasydebatesentornoalestadoylaadministracionpublica
AT caohoracio masalladelapandemialuchasydebatesentornoalestadoylaadministracionpublica
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:22:26Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:22:26Z
_version_ 1809215280686039040