CSOS and democracy: strategies to influence public policies. Justicia Legítima civil association and María de los Ángeles foundation cases

The aim of this paper is to analyze and compare strategies of two civil society organizations (CSOS) which attempted to influence public policy definition: the JusticiaLegítima civil association and the Maria de los Angeles foundation. We wonder how, these CSOS have been able to influence regarding...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weckesser, Cintia, Etkin, Eugenia
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública (IIFAP-FCS-UNC) 2016
Materias:
Organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC)
democracia
políticas públicas
agentes sociales
estrategias
Organizations of civil society (CSOS)
democracy
public policies
social agents
strategies
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/15689
Aporte de:
Administración Pública y Sociedad (APyS) de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R357-article-15689
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R357-article-156892019-05-17T13:30:35Z CSOS and democracy: strategies to influence public policies. Justicia Legítima civil association and María de los Ángeles foundation cases OSC y democracia: estrategias de incidencia en la definición de políticas públicas. Los casos de la asociación Justicia Legítima y la fundación María de los Ángeles Weckesser, Cintia Etkin, Eugenia Organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC) democracia políticas públicas agentes sociales estrategias Organizations of civil society (CSOS) democracy public policies social agents strategies The aim of this paper is to analyze and compare strategies of two civil society organizations (CSOS) which attempted to influence public policy definition: the JusticiaLegítima civil association and the Maria de los Angeles foundation. We wonder how, these CSOS have been able to influence regarding debates and specific policies, although to different extents, in spite of marginal social conditions and little political power accompanying their development. We believe that their strategies have been focused on building legitimate problems, as well as in making such constructions visible- this within a framework of particular enunciation conditions, which have carried out “acceptable” democratization claims for different social issues In addition, we consider that such possibilities of influencing can be understood and explained starting from their particular positions concerning relational systems and their skills – in terms of capabilities of undertaking-defined in such positions. In this framework, both CSOS have deployed special strategies in pursuit of achieving their goals. Finally, we seek to understand and explain their relatively successful results. En este trabajo analizamos comparativamente las estrategias de dos organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC) que buscaron incidir en la definición de políticas públicas: la asociación civil Justicia Legítima y de la fundación María de los Ángeles. Nos preguntamos cómo, habiéndose conformado en lugares sociales marginales, con escaso poder político, ambas OSC consiguieron incidir en los debates y en la definición -aunque en distintas medidas- de políticas específicas. Entendemos que sus estrategias se habrían orientado a la construcción de enunciadores legítimos y de problemas legítimos, así como a la visibilización de tales construcciones. Esto, en un marco de particulares condiciones de enunciabilidad que hicieron “aceptables” sus reclamos de democratización de distintos ámbitos de lo social. Pero, además, consideramos que sus posibilidades de incidir se comprenden y explican a partir de sus particulares posiciones en sistemas de relación específicos y de sus competencias –en términos de capacidad de hacer-, definidas en tales posiciones. Es en este entramado que ambas OSC habrían desplegado estrategias particulares en pos de la concreción de sus propósitos. Y es en ese entramado también que buscamos comprender y explicar su éxito relativo, en cada caso. Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública (IIFAP-FCS-UNC) 2016-12-23 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/15689 Administración Pública y Sociedad (APyS); Núm. 2 (2016): Julio- Diciembre 2016; 111-131 2524-9568 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/15689/16201 Derechos de autor 2019 Cintia Weckesser, Eugenia Etkin
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-357
container_title_str Administración Pública y Sociedad (APyS)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC)
democracia
políticas públicas
agentes sociales
estrategias
Organizations of civil society (CSOS)
democracy
public policies
social agents
strategies
spellingShingle Organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC)
democracia
políticas públicas
agentes sociales
estrategias
Organizations of civil society (CSOS)
democracy
public policies
social agents
strategies
Weckesser, Cintia
Etkin, Eugenia
CSOS and democracy: strategies to influence public policies. Justicia Legítima civil association and María de los Ángeles foundation cases
topic_facet Organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC)
democracia
políticas públicas
agentes sociales
estrategias
Organizations of civil society (CSOS)
democracy
public policies
social agents
strategies
author Weckesser, Cintia
Etkin, Eugenia
author_facet Weckesser, Cintia
Etkin, Eugenia
author_sort Weckesser, Cintia
title CSOS and democracy: strategies to influence public policies. Justicia Legítima civil association and María de los Ángeles foundation cases
title_short CSOS and democracy: strategies to influence public policies. Justicia Legítima civil association and María de los Ángeles foundation cases
title_full CSOS and democracy: strategies to influence public policies. Justicia Legítima civil association and María de los Ángeles foundation cases
title_fullStr CSOS and democracy: strategies to influence public policies. Justicia Legítima civil association and María de los Ángeles foundation cases
title_full_unstemmed CSOS and democracy: strategies to influence public policies. Justicia Legítima civil association and María de los Ángeles foundation cases
title_sort csos and democracy: strategies to influence public policies. justicia legítima civil association and maría de los ángeles foundation cases
description The aim of this paper is to analyze and compare strategies of two civil society organizations (CSOS) which attempted to influence public policy definition: the JusticiaLegítima civil association and the Maria de los Angeles foundation. We wonder how, these CSOS have been able to influence regarding debates and specific policies, although to different extents, in spite of marginal social conditions and little political power accompanying their development. We believe that their strategies have been focused on building legitimate problems, as well as in making such constructions visible- this within a framework of particular enunciation conditions, which have carried out “acceptable” democratization claims for different social issues In addition, we consider that such possibilities of influencing can be understood and explained starting from their particular positions concerning relational systems and their skills – in terms of capabilities of undertaking-defined in such positions. In this framework, both CSOS have deployed special strategies in pursuit of achieving their goals. Finally, we seek to understand and explain their relatively successful results.
publisher Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública (IIFAP-FCS-UNC)
publishDate 2016
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/15689
work_keys_str_mv AT weckessercintia csosanddemocracystrategiestoinfluencepublicpoliciesjusticialegitimacivilassociationandmariadelosangelesfoundationcases
AT etkineugenia csosanddemocracystrategiestoinfluencepublicpoliciesjusticialegitimacivilassociationandmariadelosangelesfoundationcases
AT weckessercintia oscydemocraciaestrategiasdeincidenciaenladefiniciondepoliticaspublicasloscasosdelaasociacionjusticialegitimaylafundacionmariadelosangeles
AT etkineugenia oscydemocraciaestrategiasdeincidenciaenladefiniciondepoliticaspublicasloscasosdelaasociacionjusticialegitimaylafundacionmariadelosangeles
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:22:02Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:22:02Z
_version_ 1809215255948034048

Ejemplares similares