The Marginalization of the sublime in hegelian aesthetics

In Lectures on Aesthetics (1989), Hegel not only marginalizes the concept of the sublime by giving it scant space, but also refers to it as a low and grotesque notion. In Hegel there is no balanced dialogue between the beautiful and the sublime, rather the beautiful is the only and undisputed protag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bisignano, Ignacio
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Secretaría de Investigación, Ciencia y Técnica. Secretaría Académica 2022
Materias:
Art
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/sintesis/article/view/37019
Aporte de:
id I10-R356-article-37019
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R356-article-370192022-08-12T13:48:15Z The Marginalization of the sublime in hegelian aesthetics La Marginación de lo sublime en la estética hegeliana Bisignano, Ignacio Hegel sublime estética dialéctica arte Hegel sublime esthetic dialectic Art In Lectures on Aesthetics (1989), Hegel not only marginalizes the concept of the sublime by giving it scant space, but also refers to it as a low and grotesque notion. In Hegel there is no balanced dialogue between the beautiful and the sublime, rather the beautiful is the only and undisputed protagonist, while sublimity is positioned as a minor accident, a footnote in the different configurations of the developtment of the concept of the beautiful. Given that in Hegelian aesthetics the sublime is approached in an exceptional and  unconventional way –if we compare it with any of the aesthetics theories of the 18th and 19th centuries-, and little importance is attached to it, this paper intends to account for what were our author´s motives for such a treatment of the concept. The main argument is base don showing that the Hegelian marginalization of the sublime is due to the dialectical role that this category has in the conceptual deployment of the beautiful in its historical dynamism. En Lecciones de estética (1989), Hegel  no solo margina el concepto de lo sublime otorgándole escaso espacio, sino que a la vez lo referencia como una noción baja y grotesca. En Hegel no existe diálogo equilibrado entre lo bello y lo sublime, más bien lo bello es el único e indiscutido protagonista, mientras la sublimidad se posiciona como un accidente menor, una nota al pie de página en las distintas configuraciones del desarrollo del concepto de lo bello. Dado que en la estética hegeliana se encara lo sublime de una manera excepcional y poco convencional- si la comparamos con cualquiera de las teorías estéticas de los siglos XVIII y XIX-, y se le otorga escasa importancia, el presente trabajo se propone dar cuenta de cuáles fueron los motivos de nuestro autor para semejante tratamiento del concepto. La principal argumentación se basa en demostrar que la marginación hegeliana de lo sublime se debe al rol dialéctico que dicha categoría tiene en el despliegue conceptual de lo bello en su dinamismo histórico. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Secretaría de Investigación, Ciencia y Técnica. Secretaría Académica 2022-08-05 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/sintesis/article/view/37019 Síntesis; Núm. 12 (2022): Revista Síntesis nº 12; 15-26 2314-291X 1851-8060 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/sintesis/article/view/37019/38523 Derechos de autor 2022 Síntesis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-356
container_title_str Síntesis
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Hegel
sublime
estética
dialéctica
arte
Hegel
sublime
esthetic
dialectic
Art
spellingShingle Hegel
sublime
estética
dialéctica
arte
Hegel
sublime
esthetic
dialectic
Art
Bisignano, Ignacio
The Marginalization of the sublime in hegelian aesthetics
topic_facet Hegel
sublime
estética
dialéctica
arte
Hegel
sublime
esthetic
dialectic
Art
author Bisignano, Ignacio
author_facet Bisignano, Ignacio
author_sort Bisignano, Ignacio
title The Marginalization of the sublime in hegelian aesthetics
title_short The Marginalization of the sublime in hegelian aesthetics
title_full The Marginalization of the sublime in hegelian aesthetics
title_fullStr The Marginalization of the sublime in hegelian aesthetics
title_full_unstemmed The Marginalization of the sublime in hegelian aesthetics
title_sort marginalization of the sublime in hegelian aesthetics
description In Lectures on Aesthetics (1989), Hegel not only marginalizes the concept of the sublime by giving it scant space, but also refers to it as a low and grotesque notion. In Hegel there is no balanced dialogue between the beautiful and the sublime, rather the beautiful is the only and undisputed protagonist, while sublimity is positioned as a minor accident, a footnote in the different configurations of the developtment of the concept of the beautiful. Given that in Hegelian aesthetics the sublime is approached in an exceptional and  unconventional way –if we compare it with any of the aesthetics theories of the 18th and 19th centuries-, and little importance is attached to it, this paper intends to account for what were our author´s motives for such a treatment of the concept. The main argument is base don showing that the Hegelian marginalization of the sublime is due to the dialectical role that this category has in the conceptual deployment of the beautiful in its historical dynamism.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Secretaría de Investigación, Ciencia y Técnica. Secretaría Académica
publishDate 2022
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/sintesis/article/view/37019
work_keys_str_mv AT bisignanoignacio themarginalizationofthesublimeinhegelianaesthetics
AT bisignanoignacio lamarginaciondelosublimeenlaesteticahegeliana
AT bisignanoignacio marginalizationofthesublimeinhegelianaesthetics
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:21:31Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:21:31Z
_version_ 1809215223430643712