The andean community preliminary consultation procedure and the european union preliminary ruling: comparison test
The objective of this research is to show the legal regime of the European Union preliminary ruling procedure and the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure. To this end, the current normative and the functioning in practice of both procedural instruments are described, focusing the ana...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6009 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R353-article-6009 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R353-article-60092019-03-27T13:39:06Z The andean community preliminary consultation procedure and the european union preliminary ruling: comparison test Consultas prejudiciales en la comunidad andina y cuestiones prejudiciales en la Unión Europea: Ensayo de comparación Mateo, Manuel Cienfuegos Court of Justice of the European Union preliminary rulings procedure Court of Justice of the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure influence Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea cuestiones prejudiciales Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina consultas prejudiciales influencia The objective of this research is to show the legal regime of the European Union preliminary ruling procedure and the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure. To this end, the current normative and the functioning in practice of both procedural instruments are described, focusing the analysis on the more important aspects, such as their nature; legal standing; powers of national jurisdictions as well as competences of the European and the Andean Courts of Justice in every preliminary procedure; procedural aspects and, finally, legal effects of preliminary rulings and remedies to their breach. Following this explanation, the similarities and differences between these two judicial cooperation mechanisms will be noted. At the end of the study, some conjectures for the significant influence of the European preliminary ruling on the Andean preliminary consultation will be offered. El objeto de esta investigación es exponer el régimen jurídico de las cuestiones prejudiciales de la Unión Europea y de las consultas prejudiciales de la Comunidad Andina. Para ello se analizan sus principales elementos a la luz de su normativa básica y su funcionamiento en la práctica, cuales son la naturaleza de estos dos instrumentos procesales; la legitimación activa para remitir las cuestiones / consultas prejudiciales y la distinción entre los jueces nacionales obligados y los facultados; las prerrogativas del juez interno en relación con las cuestiones / consultas prejudiciales y las competencias prejudiciales de los Tribunales de Justicia de la Unión Europea y de la Comunidad Andina; los aspectos procedimentales relativos a la tramitación de una solicitud prejudicial y, finalmente, los efectos jurídicos de las sentencias prejudiciales y los recursos frente a su incumplimiento. Al hilo de la exposición se irán anotando algunas semejanzas y diferencias entre ambos procedimientos de colaboración judicial. Al final de la investigación se conjetura acerca de las razones de la ascendencia tan notable de la cuestión prejudicial europea en la consulta prejudicial andina. Facultad de Derecho 2013-04-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6009 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2013): Nueva Serie II 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6009/7082 Derechos de autor 2013 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-353 |
| container_title_str |
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Court of Justice of the European Union preliminary rulings procedure Court of Justice of the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure influence Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea cuestiones prejudiciales Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina consultas prejudiciales influencia |
| spellingShingle |
Court of Justice of the European Union preliminary rulings procedure Court of Justice of the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure influence Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea cuestiones prejudiciales Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina consultas prejudiciales influencia Mateo, Manuel Cienfuegos The andean community preliminary consultation procedure and the european union preliminary ruling: comparison test |
| topic_facet |
Court of Justice of the European Union preliminary rulings procedure Court of Justice of the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure influence Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea cuestiones prejudiciales Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina consultas prejudiciales influencia |
| author |
Mateo, Manuel Cienfuegos |
| author_facet |
Mateo, Manuel Cienfuegos |
| author_sort |
Mateo, Manuel Cienfuegos |
| title |
The andean community preliminary consultation procedure and the european union preliminary ruling: comparison test |
| title_short |
The andean community preliminary consultation procedure and the european union preliminary ruling: comparison test |
| title_full |
The andean community preliminary consultation procedure and the european union preliminary ruling: comparison test |
| title_fullStr |
The andean community preliminary consultation procedure and the european union preliminary ruling: comparison test |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The andean community preliminary consultation procedure and the european union preliminary ruling: comparison test |
| title_sort |
andean community preliminary consultation procedure and the european union preliminary ruling: comparison test |
| description |
The objective of this research is to show the legal regime of the European Union preliminary ruling procedure and the Andean Community preliminary consultation procedure. To this end, the current normative and the functioning in practice of both procedural instruments are described, focusing the analysis on the more important aspects, such as their nature; legal standing; powers of national jurisdictions as well as competences of the European and the Andean Courts of Justice in every preliminary procedure; procedural aspects and, finally, legal effects of preliminary rulings and remedies to their breach. Following this explanation, the similarities and differences between these two judicial cooperation mechanisms will be noted. At the end of the study, some conjectures for the significant influence of the European preliminary ruling on the Andean preliminary consultation will be offered. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Derecho |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6009 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT mateomanuelcienfuegos theandeancommunitypreliminaryconsultationprocedureandtheeuropeanunionpreliminaryrulingcomparisontest AT mateomanuelcienfuegos consultasprejudicialesenlacomunidadandinaycuestionesprejudicialesenlaunioneuropeaensayodecomparacion AT mateomanuelcienfuegos andeancommunitypreliminaryconsultationprocedureandtheeuropeanunionpreliminaryrulingcomparisontest |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:18:48Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:18:48Z |
| _version_ |
1809215052735053824 |