Permanent Comission for the South Pacific and its response to the International Court of Justice
This article refers to the query raised by the ICJ on 10 May 2010 to the South Pacific Permanent Commission in the context of art. 34 paragraph 3 of its Statute and highlights the differences between the Chilean and Peruvian positions.
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5943 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This article refers to the query raised by the ICJ on 10 May 2010 to the South Pacific Permanent Commission in the context of art. 34 paragraph 3 of its Statute and highlights the differences between the Chilean and Peruvian positions. |
|---|