Permanent Comission for the South Pacific and its response to the International Court of Justice

This article refers to the query raised by the ICJ on 10 May 2010 to the South Pacific Permanent Commission in the context of art. 34 paragraph 3 of its Statute and highlights the differences between the Chilean and Peruvian positions.

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mansilla, Hugo Llanos
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Derecho 2011
Materias:
CIJ
ICJ
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5943
Aporte de:
id I10-R353-article-5943
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R353-article-59432019-03-27T13:37:41Z Permanent Comission for the South Pacific and its response to the International Court of Justice La Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur y su respuesta a la Corte Internacional de Justicia Mansilla, Hugo Llanos CIJ Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur (CPPS) ICJ Permanent Comission for the South Pacific (PCSP) This article refers to the query raised by the ICJ on 10 May 2010 to the South Pacific Permanent Commission in the context of art. 34 paragraph 3 of its Statute and highlights the differences between the Chilean and Peruvian positions. El presente artículo se refiere a la consulta formulada por la CIJ el 10 de mayo de 2010 a la Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur en el marco del art. 34 párrafo 3 de su Estatuto y destaca las diferencias entre las posiciones chilena y peruana. Facultad de Derecho 2011-04-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5943 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2011): Nueva Serie II 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5943/6841 Derechos de autor 2011 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-353
container_title_str Revista de la Facultad de Derecho
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic CIJ
Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur (CPPS)
ICJ
Permanent Comission for the South Pacific (PCSP)
spellingShingle CIJ
Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur (CPPS)
ICJ
Permanent Comission for the South Pacific (PCSP)
Mansilla, Hugo Llanos
Permanent Comission for the South Pacific and its response to the International Court of Justice
topic_facet CIJ
Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur (CPPS)
ICJ
Permanent Comission for the South Pacific (PCSP)
author Mansilla, Hugo Llanos
author_facet Mansilla, Hugo Llanos
author_sort Mansilla, Hugo Llanos
title Permanent Comission for the South Pacific and its response to the International Court of Justice
title_short Permanent Comission for the South Pacific and its response to the International Court of Justice
title_full Permanent Comission for the South Pacific and its response to the International Court of Justice
title_fullStr Permanent Comission for the South Pacific and its response to the International Court of Justice
title_full_unstemmed Permanent Comission for the South Pacific and its response to the International Court of Justice
title_sort permanent comission for the south pacific and its response to the international court of justice
description This article refers to the query raised by the ICJ on 10 May 2010 to the South Pacific Permanent Commission in the context of art. 34 paragraph 3 of its Statute and highlights the differences between the Chilean and Peruvian positions.
publisher Facultad de Derecho
publishDate 2011
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5943
work_keys_str_mv AT mansillahugollanos permanentcomissionforthesouthpacificanditsresponsetotheinternationalcourtofjustice
AT mansillahugollanos lacomisionpermanentedelpacificosurysurespuestaalacorteinternacionaldejusticia
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:18:36Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:18:36Z
_version_ 1809215040399605760