The theory of joseph raz. A weak version of the participant perspective
The purpose of this paper is rough draft briefly the Raz’s theory of law as one version more weaker than the internal point of view at the classical positivist version of H. L. A. Hart. That is so, because the Raz’s notion of acceptation or internal point of view, is characterized for the belief in...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5941 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The purpose of this paper is rough draft briefly the Raz’s theory of law as one version more weaker than the internal point of view at the classical positivist version of H. L. A. Hart. That is so, because the Raz’s notion of acceptation or internal point of view, is characterized for the belief in the political legitimity of legislature, coming to a conclusion in one explicative-justificatory theory of law. Moreover, his notion of internal point of view of the participant characterizes the norms like exclusionary reasons for the action. We shall expounds, furthermore, any critical remarks which arises of the identification of these reasons with facts, that which allow concluding that either aren’t reasons or are objetive reasons, because these are identify with facts that exists independently of the procedures accords for arrive to it knowledge, that is to say, with independence of individuals that reasons. |
|---|