The theory of joseph raz. A weak version of the participant perspective
The purpose of this paper is rough draft briefly the Raz’s theory of law as one version more weaker than the internal point of view at the classical positivist version of H. L. A. Hart. That is so, because the Raz’s notion of acceptation or internal point of view, is characterized for the belief in...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5941 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R353-article-5941 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R353-article-59412019-03-27T13:37:41Z The theory of joseph raz. A weak version of the participant perspective La teoría de Joseph Raz. Una versión débil de la perspectiva del participante Abril, Ernesto practical reasoning internal point of view norm exclusionary reason normative authority justification explanation political legitimity razonamiento práctico punto de vista interno norma razón excluyente autoridad normativa justificación explicación legitimidad política The purpose of this paper is rough draft briefly the Raz’s theory of law as one version more weaker than the internal point of view at the classical positivist version of H. L. A. Hart. That is so, because the Raz’s notion of acceptation or internal point of view, is characterized for the belief in the political legitimity of legislature, coming to a conclusion in one explicative-justificatory theory of law. Moreover, his notion of internal point of view of the participant characterizes the norms like exclusionary reasons for the action. We shall expounds, furthermore, any critical remarks which arises of the identification of these reasons with facts, that which allow concluding that either aren’t reasons or are objetive reasons, because these are identify with facts that exists independently of the procedures accords for arrive to it knowledge, that is to say, with independence of individuals that reasons. El propósito de este trabajo es esbozar brevemente la Teoría del Derecho de Raz como una versión más débil que la versión positivista clásica del punto de vista interno expuesta por H.L.A. Hart. Esto es así, porque la noción de Raz de aceptación o punto de vista interno está caracterizada por la creencia en la legitimidad política de la legislatura, concluyendo en una teoría del derecho explicativo-justificatoria. Además, su noción de punto de vista interno o del participante considera las normas como razones excluyentes para la acción. Esta concepción de las normas será motivo de algunas observaciones críticas provenientes de la identificación de dichas razones con hechos, lo que permite concluir que, o bien no son razones, o bien son razones objetivas, pues se identifican con hechos que existen con independencia de los procedimientos acordados para llegar a conocerlos, esto es, con independencia de sujetos que razonen. Facultad de Derecho 2011-04-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5941 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2011): Nueva Serie II 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5941/6839 Derechos de autor 2011 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-353 |
| container_title_str |
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
practical reasoning internal point of view norm exclusionary reason normative authority justification explanation political legitimity razonamiento práctico punto de vista interno norma razón excluyente autoridad normativa justificación explicación legitimidad política |
| spellingShingle |
practical reasoning internal point of view norm exclusionary reason normative authority justification explanation political legitimity razonamiento práctico punto de vista interno norma razón excluyente autoridad normativa justificación explicación legitimidad política Abril, Ernesto The theory of joseph raz. A weak version of the participant perspective |
| topic_facet |
practical reasoning internal point of view norm exclusionary reason normative authority justification explanation political legitimity razonamiento práctico punto de vista interno norma razón excluyente autoridad normativa justificación explicación legitimidad política |
| author |
Abril, Ernesto |
| author_facet |
Abril, Ernesto |
| author_sort |
Abril, Ernesto |
| title |
The theory of joseph raz. A weak version of the participant perspective |
| title_short |
The theory of joseph raz. A weak version of the participant perspective |
| title_full |
The theory of joseph raz. A weak version of the participant perspective |
| title_fullStr |
The theory of joseph raz. A weak version of the participant perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The theory of joseph raz. A weak version of the participant perspective |
| title_sort |
theory of joseph raz. a weak version of the participant perspective |
| description |
The purpose of this paper is rough draft briefly the Raz’s theory of law as one version more weaker than the internal point of view at the classical positivist version of H. L. A. Hart. That is so, because the Raz’s notion of acceptation or internal point of view, is characterized for the belief in the political legitimity of legislature, coming to a conclusion in one explicative-justificatory theory of law. Moreover, his notion of internal point of view of the participant characterizes the norms like exclusionary reasons for the action. We shall expounds, furthermore, any critical remarks which arises of the identification of these reasons with facts, that which allow concluding that either aren’t reasons or are objetive reasons, because these are identify with facts that exists independently of the procedures accords for arrive to it knowledge, that is to say, with independence of individuals that reasons. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Derecho |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5941 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT abrilernesto thetheoryofjosephrazaweakversionoftheparticipantperspective AT abrilernesto lateoriadejosephrazunaversiondebildelaperspectivadelparticipante AT abrilernesto theoryofjosephrazaweakversionoftheparticipantperspective |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:18:36Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:18:36Z |
| _version_ |
1809215039913066496 |