LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SO-CALLED "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE"

The responsibility of judicial officials has been, through jurisprudential and doctrinal criteria, the subject of a regulation that in fact generates a system of relative immunity with respect to the damages that those agents cause as a result of their functions. This immunity regime does not have l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Marcellino, Leonardo
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Derecho 2024
Materias:
Patrimonial liability
Miscarriage of justice
Responsabilidad patrimonial
Error judicial
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/45579
Aporte de:
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R353-article-45579
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R353-article-455792024-07-03T19:39:57Z LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SO-CALLED "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE" RESPONSABILIDAD POR DAÑOS DERIVADOS DEL LLAMADO "ERROR JUDICIAL" Marcellino, Leonardo Patrimonial liability Miscarriage of justice Responsabilidad patrimonial Error judicial The responsibility of judicial officials has been, through jurisprudential and doctrinal criteria, the subject of a regulation that in fact generates a system of relative immunity with respect to the damages that those agents cause as a result of their functions. This immunity regime does not have legal regulatory support and violates constitutional principles such as those of equality before thelaw and full reparation and that is why a new interpretation of these parameters or jurisprudential requirements is justified so that they adjust to the regime regulations contemplated by the Civil and Commercial Code for all public agents in art. 1766, within which the personnel of the Judicial Branch must be included and also the current reality where primacy is given to the right to reparation. La responsabilidad de los funcionarios judiciales ha sido, por medio de criterios jurisprudenciales y doctrinarios, objeto de una regulación que en los hechos genera un sistema de inmunidad relativa respecto a los daños que aquellos agentes causan con motivo de sus funciones. Ese régimen de inmunidad no tiene respaldo normativo legal y atenta contra principios de índole constitucional como son los de igualdad ante la ley y de reparación plena y es por ello que se justifica una nueva interpretación de esos parámetros o requisitos jurisprudenciales para que se ajusten al régimen normativo que contempla el Código Civil y Comercial para todos los agentes públicos en el art. 1766, dentro de los cuales debe incluirse al personal del Poder Judicial y también a la realidad actual donde se da primacía al derecho a la reparación. Facultad de Derecho 2024-07-03 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/45579 10.31054/2314.3061.v15.n1.45579 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2024): NUEVA SERIE II; 89-108 2314-3061 1850-9371 10.31054/2314.3061.v15.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/45579/45536 Derechos de autor 2024 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-353
container_title_str Revista de la Facultad de Derecho
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Patrimonial liability
Miscarriage of justice
Responsabilidad patrimonial
Error judicial
spellingShingle Patrimonial liability
Miscarriage of justice
Responsabilidad patrimonial
Error judicial
Marcellino, Leonardo
LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SO-CALLED "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE"
topic_facet Patrimonial liability
Miscarriage of justice
Responsabilidad patrimonial
Error judicial
author Marcellino, Leonardo
author_facet Marcellino, Leonardo
author_sort Marcellino, Leonardo
title LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SO-CALLED "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE"
title_short LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SO-CALLED "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE"
title_full LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SO-CALLED "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE"
title_fullStr LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SO-CALLED "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE"
title_full_unstemmed LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SO-CALLED "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE"
title_sort liability for damages arising from the so-called "miscarriage of justice"
description The responsibility of judicial officials has been, through jurisprudential and doctrinal criteria, the subject of a regulation that in fact generates a system of relative immunity with respect to the damages that those agents cause as a result of their functions. This immunity regime does not have legal regulatory support and violates constitutional principles such as those of equality before thelaw and full reparation and that is why a new interpretation of these parameters or jurisprudential requirements is justified so that they adjust to the regime regulations contemplated by the Civil and Commercial Code for all public agents in art. 1766, within which the personnel of the Judicial Branch must be included and also the current reality where primacy is given to the right to reparation.
publisher Facultad de Derecho
publishDate 2024
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/45579
work_keys_str_mv AT marcellinoleonardo liabilityfordamagesarisingfromthesocalledmiscarriageofjustice
AT marcellinoleonardo responsabilidadpordanosderivadosdelllamadoerrorjudicial
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:19:14Z
last_indexed 2025-02-05T22:12:36Z
_version_ 1823257192197783552

Ejemplares similares