THE CONTENTIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION IN THE PROVINCE OF CÓRDOBA AS A CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION
In Córdoba, after the reform introduced to the General Law of Amparo -Law 4915- through laws 10249 and 10323, the existence of a constitutional jurisdiction was ratified with the purpose of guarantee the protection of fundamental rights against any activity or omission of the state. The att...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/43659 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R353-article-43659 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R353-article-436592024-07-02T16:49:12Z THE CONTENTIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION IN THE PROVINCE OF CÓRDOBA AS A CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION LA JURISDICCIÓN CONTENCIOSO ADMINISTRATIVA EN LA PROVINCIA DE CÓRDOBA COMO JURISDICCIÓN CONSTITUCIONAL Sosa, Daniela Susana Jurisdiction Administrative litigation Amparo Constitutional Jurisdicción Contencioso administrativo Amparo Constitucional In Córdoba, after the reform introduced to the General Law of Amparo -Law 4915- through laws 10249 and 10323, the existence of a constitutional jurisdiction was ratified with the purpose of guarantee the protection of fundamental rights against any activity or omission of the state. The attribution of the intervention of a specialized justice in all “amparo” processes filed against the provincial, municipal or communal public administration in the scope of the Province, configures a modern contentious administrative jurisdiction in accordance with the constitutional and conventional guidelines that protect the residents’ rights. A review of the provincial legislative history and the jurisprudential cases resolved by the Superior Court of Justice of Córdoba, explains the correct decision of the provincial legislator to resort to a mixed model of distribution of powers in matters of protection, where in addition to the nature of public subject of the defendant, the content of the claim and the preeminence of the applicable public law regime, condition the assignment of jurisdiction to the specialized jurisdiction. En Córdoba, tras la reforma introducida a la Ley General de Amparo -Ley 4915- a través de las leyes 10249 y 10323, se ratificó la existencia de una jurisdicción constitucional cuya finalidad es garantizar la protección de los derechos fundamentales frente a toda actividad u omisión estatal. La atribución de la intervención de una justicia especializada en todos los procesos de amparos interpuestos en contra de la administración pública provincial, municipal o comunal en el ámbito de la Provincia, configura una jurisdicción contencioso administrativo moderna y acorde a las directrices constitucionales y convencionales que tutelan los derechos de los ciudadanos. Un recorrido por los antecedentes legislativos provinciales y los casos jurisprudenciales resueltos por el Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Córdoba, dan razón a la decisión acertada del legislador provincial de recurrir a un modelo mixto de distribución de competencias en materia de amparos, donde además del carácter de sujeto público del demandado, el contenido de la pretensión y la preeminencia del régimen de derecho público aplicable, condicionan la asignación de competencia al fuero especializado. Facultad de Derecho 2023-12-14 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/43659 10.31054/2314.3061.v14.n2.43659 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2023): NUEVA SERIE II; 135-158 2314-3061 1850-9371 10.31054/2314.3061.v14.n2 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/43659/43720 Derechos de autor 2023 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-353 |
| container_title_str |
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Jurisdiction Administrative litigation Amparo Constitutional Jurisdicción Contencioso administrativo Amparo Constitucional |
| spellingShingle |
Jurisdiction Administrative litigation Amparo Constitutional Jurisdicción Contencioso administrativo Amparo Constitucional Sosa, Daniela Susana THE CONTENTIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION IN THE PROVINCE OF CÓRDOBA AS A CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION |
| topic_facet |
Jurisdiction Administrative litigation Amparo Constitutional Jurisdicción Contencioso administrativo Amparo Constitucional |
| author |
Sosa, Daniela Susana |
| author_facet |
Sosa, Daniela Susana |
| author_sort |
Sosa, Daniela Susana |
| title |
THE CONTENTIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION IN THE PROVINCE OF CÓRDOBA AS A CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION |
| title_short |
THE CONTENTIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION IN THE PROVINCE OF CÓRDOBA AS A CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION |
| title_full |
THE CONTENTIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION IN THE PROVINCE OF CÓRDOBA AS A CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION |
| title_fullStr |
THE CONTENTIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION IN THE PROVINCE OF CÓRDOBA AS A CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION |
| title_full_unstemmed |
THE CONTENTIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION IN THE PROVINCE OF CÓRDOBA AS A CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION |
| title_sort |
contentious administrative jurisdiction in the province of córdoba as a constitutional jurisdiction |
| description |
In Córdoba, after the reform introduced to the General Law of Amparo -Law 4915- through laws 10249 and 10323, the existence of a constitutional jurisdiction was ratified with the purpose of guarantee the protection of fundamental rights against any activity or omission of the state. The attribution of the intervention of a specialized justice in all “amparo” processes filed against the provincial, municipal or communal public administration in the scope of the Province, configures a modern contentious administrative jurisdiction in accordance with the constitutional and conventional guidelines that protect the residents’ rights. A review of the provincial legislative history and the jurisprudential cases resolved by the Superior Court of Justice of Córdoba, explains the correct decision of the provincial legislator to resort to a mixed model of distribution of powers in matters of protection, where in addition to the nature of public subject of the defendant, the content of the claim and the preeminence of the applicable public law regime, condition the assignment of jurisdiction to the specialized jurisdiction. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Derecho |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/43659 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sosadanielasusana thecontentiousadministrativejurisdictionintheprovinceofcordobaasaconstitutionaljurisdiction AT sosadanielasusana lajurisdiccioncontenciosoadministrativaenlaprovinciadecordobacomojurisdiccionconstitucional AT sosadanielasusana contentiousadministrativejurisdictionintheprovinceofcordobaasaconstitutionaljurisdiction |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:19:12Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:19:12Z |
| _version_ |
1809215078247956480 |