A testimonial judgment

It’s natural function of jurisprudence set the significant terms of the law. Therefore jurisprudence is for law, what talk is to speech. Jurisdiction is a common mechanism for handling, authority on the use of the word, compulsive use of representations of the world, meanings in permanent movements....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Suarez, María de las Mercedes
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Derecho 2014
Materias:
GBV
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/11676
Aporte de:
id I10-R353-article-11676
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R353-article-116762019-03-28T16:12:18Z A testimonial judgment Un fallo testimonial Suarez, María de las Mercedes family violence GBV public interest legal discourse violencia familiar violencia de género interés público discurso jurídico It’s natural function of jurisprudence set the significant terms of the law. Therefore jurisprudence is for law, what talk is to speech. Jurisdiction is a common mechanism for handling, authority on the use of the word, compulsive use of representations of the world, meanings in permanent movements.The legislative peculiarity of insert confused expressions, expands the scope of discretion, in the interpretive event. In such contingencies jurisprudence as a discursive kind, should not only set the scope of the signifier, but must also create it, -no natural or improper function- because the system generates empty concepts, that is, without meaning in natural language. In in this cases judge assumes without legal (constitutional) delegation, legislative power, democratically prohibited.Include among the “public interest” case “in which it is observed a reiteration of aggressive behavior and a marked risk of occurrence is perceived a marked risk of new facts, of increasing severity”, is to extend the meaning of expression beyond the limit to where communication is possible. Es función natural de la jurisprudencia establecer el significante de los términos de la ley. Por tanto la jurisprudencia es a la ley, lo que el habla es a la lengua. El ejercicio de la jurisdicción es un mecanismo habitual de manipulación, de autoridad en el uso de la palabra, manejo compulsivo de las representaciones del mundo, de significaciones en permanente movimiento.La particularidad legislativa de insertar expresiones anfibológicas, amplía los márgenes de discrecionalidad frente a la eventualidad interpretativa. En tales contingencias la jurisprudencia como especie discursiva, no sólo debe fijar los alcances del significante, sino que también debe crearlo, -función no natural o impropia- dado a que el sistema genera conceptos vacíos, esto es, carentes de significación en el lenguaje natural. En estas circunstancias, el juez asume sin delegación legal (constitucional) la facultad legislativa, que le está republicanamente prohibida.Incluir entre las “razones de interés público” los casos “en los que se observa una reiteración de conductas agresivas y se percibe un acusado riesgo de que se produzcan nuevos hechos, de gravedad ascendente”, es extender el significado de la expresión más allá del límite hasta donde es posible la comunicación. Facultad de Derecho 2014-11-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/11676 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2014): Nueva Serie II 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/11676/12086 Derechos de autor 2014 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-353
container_title_str Revista de la Facultad de Derecho
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic family violence
GBV
public interest
legal discourse
violencia familiar
violencia de género
interés público
discurso jurídico
spellingShingle family violence
GBV
public interest
legal discourse
violencia familiar
violencia de género
interés público
discurso jurídico
Suarez, María de las Mercedes
A testimonial judgment
topic_facet family violence
GBV
public interest
legal discourse
violencia familiar
violencia de género
interés público
discurso jurídico
author Suarez, María de las Mercedes
author_facet Suarez, María de las Mercedes
author_sort Suarez, María de las Mercedes
title A testimonial judgment
title_short A testimonial judgment
title_full A testimonial judgment
title_fullStr A testimonial judgment
title_full_unstemmed A testimonial judgment
title_sort testimonial judgment
description It’s natural function of jurisprudence set the significant terms of the law. Therefore jurisprudence is for law, what talk is to speech. Jurisdiction is a common mechanism for handling, authority on the use of the word, compulsive use of representations of the world, meanings in permanent movements.The legislative peculiarity of insert confused expressions, expands the scope of discretion, in the interpretive event. In such contingencies jurisprudence as a discursive kind, should not only set the scope of the signifier, but must also create it, -no natural or improper function- because the system generates empty concepts, that is, without meaning in natural language. In in this cases judge assumes without legal (constitutional) delegation, legislative power, democratically prohibited.Include among the “public interest” case “in which it is observed a reiteration of aggressive behavior and a marked risk of occurrence is perceived a marked risk of new facts, of increasing severity”, is to extend the meaning of expression beyond the limit to where communication is possible.
publisher Facultad de Derecho
publishDate 2014
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/11676
work_keys_str_mv AT suarezmariadelasmercedes atestimonialjudgment
AT suarezmariadelasmercedes unfallotestimonial
AT suarezmariadelasmercedes testimonialjudgment
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:17:41Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:17:41Z
_version_ 1809214982477316096