Appraisal of digital records: continuities and ruptures

In the last decades, changes in the dynamics of organizations and in the way documents are produced have generated new challenges for the archives area. The massive production of documents in digital format led the area to rethink some of its practices and theories, with repercussions on all archiva...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chagas, Cintia Aparecida
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Archivología 2022
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuario/article/view/37900
Aporte de:
Anuario Escuela de Archivología de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R345-article-37900
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-345
container_title_str Anuario Escuela de Archivología
language Español
format Artículo revista
author Chagas, Cintia Aparecida
spellingShingle Chagas, Cintia Aparecida
Appraisal of digital records: continuities and ruptures
author_facet Chagas, Cintia Aparecida
author_sort Chagas, Cintia Aparecida
title Appraisal of digital records: continuities and ruptures
title_short Appraisal of digital records: continuities and ruptures
title_full Appraisal of digital records: continuities and ruptures
title_fullStr Appraisal of digital records: continuities and ruptures
title_full_unstemmed Appraisal of digital records: continuities and ruptures
title_sort appraisal of digital records: continuities and ruptures
description In the last decades, changes in the dynamics of organizations and in the way documents are produced have generated new challenges for the archives area. The massive production of documents in digital format led the area to rethink some of its practices and theories, with repercussions on all archival functions. In this context, the need to evaluate to decide what deserves to be permanently preserved and what can be eliminated in the short, medium or long term becomes even greater. The difficulties and specificities associated with the management and preservation of digital records in the context of a highly connected society, with increasingly horizontal and less hierarchical organizations have led to new reflections and theoretical and methodological developments in the field of archival appraisal. In this article, some of these proposals in the context of contemporary archiving are presented and discussed, highlighting the continuities and changes in the archival appraisal contemplated by these proposals. It is concluded that, despite presenting themselves as ruptures, the theoretical constructions of contemporary archival science are strongly influenced by classical archival thinking and do not represent a significant rupture, at least in the scope of archival appraisal. Furthermore, such proposals do not provide significantly different answers regarding the evaluation of digital documents compared to the evaluation model produced in the mid-20th century by archivist Theodore Schellenberg.   Key Words: archival appraisal; records management; digital records; archival science.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Archivología
publishDate 2022
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuario/article/view/37900
work_keys_str_mv AT chagascintiaaparecida appraisalofdigitalrecordscontinuitiesandruptures
AT chagascintiaaparecida evaluaciondedocumentosdearchivodigitalescontinuidadesyrupturas
AT chagascintiaaparecida avaliacaodedocumentosarquivisticosdigitaiscontinuidadeserupturas
first_indexed 2024-09-03T21:33:57Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T21:33:57Z
_version_ 1809212231214170112
spelling I10-R345-article-379002022-06-09T03:37:05Z Appraisal of digital records: continuities and ruptures Evaluación de documentos de archivo digitales: continuidades y rupturas Avaliação de documentos arquivísticos digitais: continuidades e rupturas Chagas, Cintia Aparecida In the last decades, changes in the dynamics of organizations and in the way documents are produced have generated new challenges for the archives area. The massive production of documents in digital format led the area to rethink some of its practices and theories, with repercussions on all archival functions. In this context, the need to evaluate to decide what deserves to be permanently preserved and what can be eliminated in the short, medium or long term becomes even greater. The difficulties and specificities associated with the management and preservation of digital records in the context of a highly connected society, with increasingly horizontal and less hierarchical organizations have led to new reflections and theoretical and methodological developments in the field of archival appraisal. In this article, some of these proposals in the context of contemporary archiving are presented and discussed, highlighting the continuities and changes in the archival appraisal contemplated by these proposals. It is concluded that, despite presenting themselves as ruptures, the theoretical constructions of contemporary archival science are strongly influenced by classical archival thinking and do not represent a significant rupture, at least in the scope of archival appraisal. Furthermore, such proposals do not provide significantly different answers regarding the evaluation of digital documents compared to the evaluation model produced in the mid-20th century by archivist Theodore Schellenberg.   Key Words: archival appraisal; records management; digital records; archival science. En las últimas décadas, los cambios en la dinámica de las organizaciones y en la forma de producir documentos han generado nuevos desafíos para el área de archivos. La producción masiva de documentos en formato digital llevó al área a repensar algunas de sus prácticas y teorías, con repercusiones en todas las funciones archivísticas. En este contexto, se hace aún mayor la necesidad de evaluar para decidir qué merece ser preservado permanentemente y qué puede ser eliminado en el corto, mediano o largo plazo. Las dificultades y especificidades asociadas a la gestión y conservación de documentos digitales en el contexto de una sociedad altamente conectada, con organizaciones cada vez más horizontales y menos jerárquicas, han dado lugar a nuevas reflexiones y desarrollos teóricos y metodológicos en el campo de la valoración documental. En este artículo se presentan y discuten algunas de estas propuestas en el contexto de la archivística contemporánea, destacando las continuidades y cambios en la valoración de los documentos contemplados por estas propuestas. Se concluye que, a pesar de presentarse como rupturas, las construcciones teóricas de la archivística contemporánea están fuertemente influenciadas por el pensamiento archivístico clásico y no representan una ruptura significativa, al menos en el ámbito de la valoración documental. Además, tales propuestas no brindan respuestas significativamente diferentes con respecto a la valoración de documentos digitales en comparación con el modelo de valoración elaborado a mediados del siglo XX por el archivista Theodore Schellenberg.   Palabras clave: valoración documental; gestión de documentos; documento digital; archivística. Nas últimas décadas, modificações na dinâmica das organizações e na forma de produção dos documentos geraram novos desafios para a área de arquivos. A produção massiva de documentos em formato digital levou a área a repensar algumas de suas práticas e teorias, com reflexos em todas as funções arquivísticas. Nesse contexto, a necessidade de avaliar para decidir o que merece ser preservado permanentemente e o que pode ser eliminado em curto, médio ou longo prazo torna-se ainda maior. As dificuldades e especificidades associadas à gestão e preservação de documentos digitais no contexto de uma sociedade altamente conectada, com organizações cada vez mais horizontais e menos hierárquicas levaram a novas reflexões e desenvolvimentos teóricos e metodológicos no campo da avaliação de documentos. Nesse artigo, são apresentadas e discutidas algumas dessas propostas no âmbito da arquivística contemporânea, destacando as continuidades e modificações na avaliação de documentos contempladas por essas propostas. Conclui-se que, apesar de se apresentarem como rupturas, as construções teóricas da arquivística contemporânea são fortemente influenciadas por um pensamento arquivístico clássico e não representam uma ruptura significativa pelo menos no âmbito da avaliação de documentos. Além disso, tais propostas não trazem respostas significativamente diferentes no que tange à avaliação de documentos digitais se comparadas ao modelo de avaliação produzido em meados do século XX pelo arquivista Theodore Schellenberg.   Palavras chave: avaliação de documentos arquivísticos; gestão de documentos; documento digital; arquivologia. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Archivología 2022-06-09 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuario/article/view/37900 Anuario Escuela de Archivología; Núm. 13 (2021): Anuario Escuela de Archivología; 89-117 1852-6446 1853-3949 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuario/article/view/37900/37829 Derechos de autor 2022 Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución – No Comercial – Sin Obra Derivada 4.0 Internacional. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Ejemplares similares