Peronism in power: the first and failed experience of government in Formosa, 1973

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

This article aims at analyzing the particular case of the province of Formosa, the first province to be intervened six months after the installation of the new constitutional government and one month after the inauguration of President Perón. Antenor Gauna and Ausberto Ortíz was the governmental for...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Servetto, Alicia
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades 2002
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/cuadernosdehistoriaeys/article/view/9909
Aporte de:
Cuadernos de Historia. Serie Economía y Sociedad de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R343-article-9909
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R343-article-99092021-09-24T16:12:34Z Peronism in power: the first and failed experience of government in Formosa, 1973 El peronismo en el poder: la primera y fallida experiencia de gobierno en Formosa, 1973 Servetto, Alicia This article aims at analyzing the particular case of the province of Formosa, the first province to be intervened six months after the installation of the new constitutional government and one month after the inauguration of President Perón. Antenor Gauna and Ausberto Ortíz was the governmental formula that led Peronism to victory with 70.2% of the votes, in the second round. It was the first Peronist government in Formosa to conquer power after its provincialization in June 1955. A young, frontier and peripheral province, it was characterized by its discontinuous political experiences and its short history of participation and institutional representation. Its marginality in the economic and social map of Argentina was also reflected in the political literature of the seventies: none of the classic texts mentioned the problems of Formosa and, even less, referred to the internal process that ended with the federal intervention. Indeed, in the particular case of the province of Formosa, it is possible to observe different lines of conflict which, although in some aspects, are reduced to the intra-Peronist conflict, the internal dispute for power was also articulated with the mobilization of other social actors that had become the main mobilizing force in the province, such as the Unión de Ligas Campesinas de Formosa (ULICAF). El presente artículo pretende analizar elcaso particular de la provincia de Formosa, primera provincia intervenida a seis meses de instalado el nuevo gobierno constitucional y a un mes de la asunción del Presidente Perón. Antenor Gauna y Ausberto Ortíz fue la fórmula gubernamental que llevó el peronismo a la victoria con el 70,2% de los sufragios, en segunda vuelta. Se trataba del primer gobierno peronista en Formosa que conquistaba el poder luego de su provincialización en junio de 1955. Provincia joven, de frontera y periférica, se caracterizaba por sus experiencias políticas discontinuas y por su corta historia de participación y representación institucional. Su marginalidad en el mapa económico y social de la Argentina también quedó reflejada en la literatura política de los setenta: en ninguno de los textos clásicos se menciona la problemática de Formosa y, menos aún, refieren al proceso interno que concluyó con la intervención federal. En efecto, en el caso particular de la provincia de Formosa, es posible observar diferentes líneas de conflicto que si bien, en algunos aspectos, se reducen aun conflicto intraperonista, la disputa interna por el poder se articuló también con la movilización de otros actores sociales que se habían convertido en la principal fuerza movilizadora de la provincia, tal el caso de la Unión de Ligas Campesinas de Formosa (ULICAF). Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades 2002-02-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/cuadernosdehistoriaeys/article/view/9909 10.53872/2422.7544.n5.9909 Cuadernos de Historia. Serie Economía y Sociedad; Núm. 5 (2002); 161-187 2422-7544 1514-5816 10.53872/2422.7544.n5 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/cuadernosdehistoriaeys/article/view/9909/10585 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/cuadernosdehistoriaeys/article/view/9909/31247 Derechos de autor 2014 Cuadernos de historia. Serie Economía y Sociedad https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-343
container_title_str Cuadernos de Historia. Serie Economía y Sociedad
language Español
format Artículo revista
author Servetto, Alicia
spellingShingle Servetto, Alicia
Peronism in power: the first and failed experience of government in Formosa, 1973
author_facet Servetto, Alicia
author_sort Servetto, Alicia
title Peronism in power: the first and failed experience of government in Formosa, 1973
title_short Peronism in power: the first and failed experience of government in Formosa, 1973
title_full Peronism in power: the first and failed experience of government in Formosa, 1973
title_fullStr Peronism in power: the first and failed experience of government in Formosa, 1973
title_full_unstemmed Peronism in power: the first and failed experience of government in Formosa, 1973
title_sort peronism in power: the first and failed experience of government in formosa, 1973
description This article aims at analyzing the particular case of the province of Formosa, the first province to be intervened six months after the installation of the new constitutional government and one month after the inauguration of President Perón. Antenor Gauna and Ausberto Ortíz was the governmental formula that led Peronism to victory with 70.2% of the votes, in the second round. It was the first Peronist government in Formosa to conquer power after its provincialization in June 1955. A young, frontier and peripheral province, it was characterized by its discontinuous political experiences and its short history of participation and institutional representation. Its marginality in the economic and social map of Argentina was also reflected in the political literature of the seventies: none of the classic texts mentioned the problems of Formosa and, even less, referred to the internal process that ended with the federal intervention. Indeed, in the particular case of the province of Formosa, it is possible to observe different lines of conflict which, although in some aspects, are reduced to the intra-Peronist conflict, the internal dispute for power was also articulated with the mobilization of other social actors that had become the main mobilizing force in the province, such as the Unión de Ligas Campesinas de Formosa (ULICAF).
publisher Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
publishDate 2002
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/cuadernosdehistoriaeys/article/view/9909
work_keys_str_mv AT servettoalicia peronisminpowerthefirstandfailedexperienceofgovernmentinformosa1973
AT servettoalicia elperonismoenelpoderlaprimerayfallidaexperienciadegobiernoenformosa1973
first_indexed 2024-09-03T21:26:21Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T21:26:21Z
_version_ 1809211752888401920

Ejemplares similares