JURISPRUDENTIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL ASPECTS, APPLICABLE NORMS AND DECISIONS OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS OF THE LAW OF THE SEA

The present work is concentrated on the comparative analysis of the ICJ jurisprudential practice, ITLOS, and of the various arbitral courts conformed to Annex VII relating to the interpretation of the provisions of the relative articles of UNCLOS (253, 283, 287, 288, 294, 298, 300 UNCLOS). The inter...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Liakopoulos, Dimitris
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Derecho Público 2021
Materias:
UNCLOS
law of the sea
ITLOS
ICJ
arbitration
dispute of settlements
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recordip/article/view/32279
Aporte de:
RECORDIP de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R336-article-32279
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R336-article-322792025-08-26T20:05:11Z JURISPRUDENTIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL ASPECTS, APPLICABLE NORMS AND DECISIONS OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS OF THE LAW OF THE SEA Liakopoulos, Dimitris UNCLOS law of the sea ITLOS ICJ arbitration dispute of settlements The present work is concentrated on the comparative analysis of the ICJ jurisprudential practice, ITLOS, and of the various arbitral courts conformed to Annex VII relating to the interpretation of the provisions of the relative articles of UNCLOS (253, 283, 287, 288, 294, 298, 300 UNCLOS). The interpretation as we see has not been, through the jurisprudence, until now always uniform and coherent and the increase of the disputes submitted could involve the risk of a fragmentation of the procedural rules of the UNCLOS, also favored by a certain judicial activism that pushes the courts and tribunals to assert their jurisdiction also through a creative and innovative interpretation of procedural rules. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Derecho Público 2021-02-25 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recordip/article/view/32279 RECORDIP; Núm. 1 (2021); 1-46 2250-5059 eng https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recordip/article/view/32279/33087 Derechos de autor 2021 Dimitris Liakopoulos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-336
container_title_str RECORDIP
language Inglés
format Artículo revista
topic UNCLOS
law of the sea
ITLOS
ICJ
arbitration
dispute of settlements
spellingShingle UNCLOS
law of the sea
ITLOS
ICJ
arbitration
dispute of settlements
Liakopoulos, Dimitris
JURISPRUDENTIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL ASPECTS, APPLICABLE NORMS AND DECISIONS OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS OF THE LAW OF THE SEA
topic_facet UNCLOS
law of the sea
ITLOS
ICJ
arbitration
dispute of settlements
author Liakopoulos, Dimitris
author_facet Liakopoulos, Dimitris
author_sort Liakopoulos, Dimitris
title JURISPRUDENTIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL ASPECTS, APPLICABLE NORMS AND DECISIONS OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS OF THE LAW OF THE SEA
title_short JURISPRUDENTIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL ASPECTS, APPLICABLE NORMS AND DECISIONS OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS OF THE LAW OF THE SEA
title_full JURISPRUDENTIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL ASPECTS, APPLICABLE NORMS AND DECISIONS OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS OF THE LAW OF THE SEA
title_fullStr JURISPRUDENTIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL ASPECTS, APPLICABLE NORMS AND DECISIONS OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS OF THE LAW OF THE SEA
title_full_unstemmed JURISPRUDENTIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL ASPECTS, APPLICABLE NORMS AND DECISIONS OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS OF THE LAW OF THE SEA
title_sort jurisprudential and jurisdictional aspects, applicable norms and decisions of the arbitral tribunals of the law of the sea
description The present work is concentrated on the comparative analysis of the ICJ jurisprudential practice, ITLOS, and of the various arbitral courts conformed to Annex VII relating to the interpretation of the provisions of the relative articles of UNCLOS (253, 283, 287, 288, 294, 298, 300 UNCLOS). The interpretation as we see has not been, through the jurisprudence, until now always uniform and coherent and the increase of the disputes submitted could involve the risk of a fragmentation of the procedural rules of the UNCLOS, also favored by a certain judicial activism that pushes the courts and tribunals to assert their jurisdiction also through a creative and innovative interpretation of procedural rules.
publisher Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Derecho Público
publishDate 2021
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recordip/article/view/32279
work_keys_str_mv AT liakopoulosdimitris jurisprudentialandjurisdictionalaspectsapplicablenormsanddecisionsofthearbitraltribunalsofthelawofthesea
first_indexed 2024-09-03T21:17:42Z
last_indexed 2025-08-27T05:11:58Z
_version_ 1845570195627704320

Ejemplares similares