Adaptive Evaluation of Neuroticism through the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire

This work analyses the convenience of adaptive-ly administering the neuroticism items belonging to the Argentine adaptation of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. The study included 594 people from the general population. Seventy percent of the cases were used to calibrate items according...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abal, Facundo Juan Pablo, Lozzia, Gabriela Susana, Auné, Sofía Esmeralda, Attorresi, Horacio Félix
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI, Conicet-UNC) 2019
Materias:
neuroticismo
Eysenck
test adaptativo informatizado
modelo logístico de dos parámetros
Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/23877
Aporte de:
Revista Evaluar de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R331-article-23877
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R331-article-238772021-06-06T01:26:24Z Adaptive Evaluation of Neuroticism through the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Evaluación adaptativa del Neuroticismo mediante el Cuestionario Revisado de Personalidad de Eysenck Abal, Facundo Juan Pablo Lozzia, Gabriela Susana Auné, Sofía Esmeralda Attorresi, Horacio Félix neuroticismo Eysenck test adaptativo informatizado modelo logístico de dos parámetros Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem This work analyses the convenience of adaptive-ly administering the neuroticism items belonging to the Argentine adaptation of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. The study included 594 people from the general population. Seventy percent of the cases were used to calibrate items according to the two-parameter logistic model. The rest of the cases were used to analyse evidence of validity and reliability of the computerized adaptive test using a mix stopping criterion (estimation error ≤ .4 or ad-ministration of 9 items). Results showed that 48.9% of the participants reached an ≤ .4 error after the administration of 6 items and that 69.1% required 9 items or less. The cor-relation between the level estimated with the full test and the adaptive version was of .98. The association with exter-nal criteria did not vary substantially either. The discussion addresses the advantages and limitations that stem from the lack of items which are discriminative at low-trait levels. Se estudió la conveniencia de administrar adaptativamente los ítems de Neuroticismo pertenecientes a la adaptación argentina del Cuestionario Revisado de Personalidad de Eysenck. Participaron 594 personas de población general. Un 70% de los casos sirvió para calibrar los ítems según el modelo logístico de dos parámetros. El resto se usó para analizar evidencias de validez y confiabilidad del test adaptativo informatizado usando un criterio de parada mixto (error de estimación ≤ .4 o administración de 9 ítems). El 48.9% de los participantes alcanzó el error ≤ .4 luego de presentarles 6 ítems y el 69.1% requirió de 9 ítems o menos. La correlación entre el nivel estimado con el test completo y la versión adaptativa fue de .98. Tampoco varió sustancialmente la asociación con criterios externos. La discusión aborda las ventajas y limitaciones vinculadas a la falta de ítems que discriminen en los niveles bajos del rasgo. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI, Conicet-UNC) 2019-04-03 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/23877 10.35670/1667-4545.v19.n1.23877 Revista Evaluar; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2019) 1667-4545 10.35670/1667-4545.v19.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/23877/23421 Derechos de autor 2019 Facundo Juan Pablo Abal, Gabriela Susana Lozzia, Sofía Esmeralda Auné, Horacio Félix Attorresi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-331
container_title_str Revista Evaluar
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic neuroticismo
Eysenck
test adaptativo informatizado
modelo logístico de dos parámetros
Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem
spellingShingle neuroticismo
Eysenck
test adaptativo informatizado
modelo logístico de dos parámetros
Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem
Abal, Facundo Juan Pablo
Lozzia, Gabriela Susana
Auné, Sofía Esmeralda
Attorresi, Horacio Félix
Adaptive Evaluation of Neuroticism through the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
topic_facet neuroticismo
Eysenck
test adaptativo informatizado
modelo logístico de dos parámetros
Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem
author Abal, Facundo Juan Pablo
Lozzia, Gabriela Susana
Auné, Sofía Esmeralda
Attorresi, Horacio Félix
author_facet Abal, Facundo Juan Pablo
Lozzia, Gabriela Susana
Auné, Sofía Esmeralda
Attorresi, Horacio Félix
author_sort Abal, Facundo Juan Pablo
title Adaptive Evaluation of Neuroticism through the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
title_short Adaptive Evaluation of Neuroticism through the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
title_full Adaptive Evaluation of Neuroticism through the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
title_fullStr Adaptive Evaluation of Neuroticism through the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive Evaluation of Neuroticism through the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
title_sort adaptive evaluation of neuroticism through the revised eysenck personality questionnaire
description This work analyses the convenience of adaptive-ly administering the neuroticism items belonging to the Argentine adaptation of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. The study included 594 people from the general population. Seventy percent of the cases were used to calibrate items according to the two-parameter logistic model. The rest of the cases were used to analyse evidence of validity and reliability of the computerized adaptive test using a mix stopping criterion (estimation error ≤ .4 or ad-ministration of 9 items). Results showed that 48.9% of the participants reached an ≤ .4 error after the administration of 6 items and that 69.1% required 9 items or less. The cor-relation between the level estimated with the full test and the adaptive version was of .98. The association with exter-nal criteria did not vary substantially either. The discussion addresses the advantages and limitations that stem from the lack of items which are discriminative at low-trait levels.
publisher Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI, Conicet-UNC)
publishDate 2019
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/23877
work_keys_str_mv AT abalfacundojuanpablo adaptiveevaluationofneuroticismthroughtherevisedeysenckpersonalityquestionnaire
AT lozziagabrielasusana adaptiveevaluationofneuroticismthroughtherevisedeysenckpersonalityquestionnaire
AT aunesofiaesmeralda adaptiveevaluationofneuroticismthroughtherevisedeysenckpersonalityquestionnaire
AT attorresihoraciofelix adaptiveevaluationofneuroticismthroughtherevisedeysenckpersonalityquestionnaire
AT abalfacundojuanpablo evaluacionadaptativadelneuroticismomedianteelcuestionariorevisadodepersonalidaddeeysenck
AT lozziagabrielasusana evaluacionadaptativadelneuroticismomedianteelcuestionariorevisadodepersonalidaddeeysenck
AT aunesofiaesmeralda evaluacionadaptativadelneuroticismomedianteelcuestionariorevisadodepersonalidaddeeysenck
AT attorresihoraciofelix evaluacionadaptativadelneuroticismomedianteelcuestionariorevisadodepersonalidaddeeysenck
first_indexed 2024-09-03T21:07:06Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T21:07:06Z
_version_ 1809210541588086784

Ejemplares similares