Validation of a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification for postoperative complications in orthopedic surgery

Introduction: Postoperative complications (PCs) constitute any deviation from the normal postoperative course. Reporting of PCs remains a challenge, multiple classification systems have been proposed, however these have not been validated across surgical specialties. Clavien and Dindo (DCCS) develop...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camino Willhuber, Gaston, Slullitel, Pablo, Taype Zamboni, Danilo, Albergo, Jose, Terrasa, Sergio, Piuzzi, Nicolas, Boretto, Jorge
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Universidad Nacional Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27931
Aporte de:
id I10-R327-article-27931
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-327
container_title_str Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba
language Inglés
format Artículo revista
topic postoperative complications
orthopedics
health systems
complicaciones posoperatorias
ortopedia
sistemas de salud
complicações pós-operatórias
ortopedia
sistemas de saúde
spellingShingle postoperative complications
orthopedics
health systems
complicaciones posoperatorias
ortopedia
sistemas de salud
complicações pós-operatórias
ortopedia
sistemas de saúde
Camino Willhuber, Gaston
Slullitel, Pablo
Taype Zamboni, Danilo
Albergo, Jose
Terrasa, Sergio
Piuzzi, Nicolas
Boretto, Jorge
Validation of a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification for postoperative complications in orthopedic surgery
topic_facet postoperative complications
orthopedics
health systems
complicaciones posoperatorias
ortopedia
sistemas de salud
complicações pós-operatórias
ortopedia
sistemas de saúde
author Camino Willhuber, Gaston
Slullitel, Pablo
Taype Zamboni, Danilo
Albergo, Jose
Terrasa, Sergio
Piuzzi, Nicolas
Boretto, Jorge
author_facet Camino Willhuber, Gaston
Slullitel, Pablo
Taype Zamboni, Danilo
Albergo, Jose
Terrasa, Sergio
Piuzzi, Nicolas
Boretto, Jorge
author_sort Camino Willhuber, Gaston
title Validation of a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification for postoperative complications in orthopedic surgery
title_short Validation of a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification for postoperative complications in orthopedic surgery
title_full Validation of a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification for postoperative complications in orthopedic surgery
title_fullStr Validation of a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification for postoperative complications in orthopedic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification for postoperative complications in orthopedic surgery
title_sort validation of a modified clavien-dindo classification for postoperative complications in orthopedic surgery
description Introduction: Postoperative complications (PCs) constitute any deviation from the normal postoperative course. Reporting of PCs remains a challenge, multiple classification systems have been proposed, however these have not been validated across surgical specialties. Clavien and Dindo (DCCS) developed a system for General Surgery and has been adopted in different fields. Nonetheless, this classification has not been adapted to Orthopedics. The objective of this study was to adapt the Clavien-Dindo classification to orthopedic scenarios and to determine the intra and interobserver reliability. Methods: The designer team adapted the Clavien Dindo classification to orthopedic scenarios. Ten orthopedic observers with different degrees of training and experience were selected to evaluate the classification. 48 simulated clinical scenarios of complications and another negative outcomes such as failure to cure and sequelae were sent by electronic format independently. A second round of scoring was performed 30 days later to assess the intraobserver concordance. Results: We found a high interobserver and intraobserver reliability for both the first and second evaluation (Kappa 0.88 and 0.91, respectively). In addition, the intraobserver analysis showed a very good correlation (Kappa 0.93). Discussion: The DCCS classification has been developed for general surgery and has been widely applied in the different surgical subspecialties. In Orthopedics, this classification was validated to hip and pediatric surgery. Therefore, our study involved an adaptation of the classification to general and specific orthopedic scenarios of the different orthopedic subspecialties. This classification may be a useful tool for documenting complications in orthopedic surgery. Keywords: postoperative complications; orthopedics; health systems    
publisher Universidad Nacional Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología
publishDate 2020
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27931
work_keys_str_mv AT caminowillhubergaston validationofamodifiedclaviendindoclassificationforpostoperativecomplicationsinorthopedicsurgery
AT slullitelpablo validationofamodifiedclaviendindoclassificationforpostoperativecomplicationsinorthopedicsurgery
AT taypezambonidanilo validationofamodifiedclaviendindoclassificationforpostoperativecomplicationsinorthopedicsurgery
AT albergojose validationofamodifiedclaviendindoclassificationforpostoperativecomplicationsinorthopedicsurgery
AT terrasasergio validationofamodifiedclaviendindoclassificationforpostoperativecomplicationsinorthopedicsurgery
AT piuzzinicolas validationofamodifiedclaviendindoclassificationforpostoperativecomplicationsinorthopedicsurgery
AT borettojorge validationofamodifiedclaviendindoclassificationforpostoperativecomplicationsinorthopedicsurgery
AT caminowillhubergaston validaciondelaclasificaciondeclaviendindomodificadaparacomplicacionespostoperatoriasencirugiaortopedica
AT slullitelpablo validaciondelaclasificaciondeclaviendindomodificadaparacomplicacionespostoperatoriasencirugiaortopedica
AT taypezambonidanilo validaciondelaclasificaciondeclaviendindomodificadaparacomplicacionespostoperatoriasencirugiaortopedica
AT albergojose validaciondelaclasificaciondeclaviendindomodificadaparacomplicacionespostoperatoriasencirugiaortopedica
AT terrasasergio validaciondelaclasificaciondeclaviendindomodificadaparacomplicacionespostoperatoriasencirugiaortopedica
AT piuzzinicolas validaciondelaclasificaciondeclaviendindomodificadaparacomplicacionespostoperatoriasencirugiaortopedica
AT borettojorge validaciondelaclasificaciondeclaviendindomodificadaparacomplicacionespostoperatoriasencirugiaortopedica
first_indexed 2024-09-03T21:01:48Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T21:01:48Z
_version_ 1809210208704004096
spelling I10-R327-article-279312024-08-27T18:27:51Z Validation of a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification for postoperative complications in orthopedic surgery Validación de la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo modificada para complicaciones postoperatorias en cirugía ortopédica Validación de la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo modificada para complicaciones postoperatorias en cirugía ortopédica Camino Willhuber, Gaston Slullitel, Pablo Taype Zamboni, Danilo Albergo, Jose Terrasa, Sergio Piuzzi, Nicolas Boretto, Jorge postoperative complications orthopedics health systems complicaciones posoperatorias ortopedia sistemas de salud complicações pós-operatórias ortopedia sistemas de saúde Introduction: Postoperative complications (PCs) constitute any deviation from the normal postoperative course. Reporting of PCs remains a challenge, multiple classification systems have been proposed, however these have not been validated across surgical specialties. Clavien and Dindo (DCCS) developed a system for General Surgery and has been adopted in different fields. Nonetheless, this classification has not been adapted to Orthopedics. The objective of this study was to adapt the Clavien-Dindo classification to orthopedic scenarios and to determine the intra and interobserver reliability. Methods: The designer team adapted the Clavien Dindo classification to orthopedic scenarios. Ten orthopedic observers with different degrees of training and experience were selected to evaluate the classification. 48 simulated clinical scenarios of complications and another negative outcomes such as failure to cure and sequelae were sent by electronic format independently. A second round of scoring was performed 30 days later to assess the intraobserver concordance. Results: We found a high interobserver and intraobserver reliability for both the first and second evaluation (Kappa 0.88 and 0.91, respectively). In addition, the intraobserver analysis showed a very good correlation (Kappa 0.93). Discussion: The DCCS classification has been developed for general surgery and has been widely applied in the different surgical subspecialties. In Orthopedics, this classification was validated to hip and pediatric surgery. Therefore, our study involved an adaptation of the classification to general and specific orthopedic scenarios of the different orthopedic subspecialties. This classification may be a useful tool for documenting complications in orthopedic surgery. Keywords: postoperative complications; orthopedics; health systems     Introducción: Las complicaciones postoperatorias constituyen cualquier desviación del estado postoperatorio normal. El registro de las mismas sigue siendo un desafío, se han propuesto múltiples sistemas de clasificación, sin embargo, estos no han sido validados en todas las especialidades quirúrgicas. Clavien y Dindo desarrollaron un sistema para Cirugía General y ha sido adoptado en diferentes campos. Sin embargo, esta clasificación no se ha adaptado a la ortopedia. El objetivo de este estudio fue adaptar la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo a los escenarios ortopédicos y determinar la confiabilidad intra e interobservador.   Materiales y Métodos: Se adaptó la clasificación de Clavien Dindo a los escenarios ortopédicos. Diez observadores con diferentes grados de entrenamiento y experiencia fueron seleccionados para evaluar la clasificación. Se enviaron 48 escenarios clínicos simulados de complicaciones y otros resultados negativos en formato electrónico de forma independiente. Se realizó una segunda ronda de puntuación 30 días después para evaluar la concordancia intraobservador.   Resultados: Encontramos una alta confiabilidad interobservador e intraobservador tanto para la primera como para la segunda evaluación (Kappa 0.88 y 0.91, respectivamente). Además, el análisis intraobservador mostró una muy buena correlación (Kappa 0,93).   Discusión: La clasificación Clavien-Dindo se ha desarrollado para cirugía general y se ha aplicado ampliamente en las diferentes subespecialidades quirúrgicas. En ortopedia, esta clasificación fue validada para cirugías de cadera y pediátrica. Por lo tanto, nuestro estudio implicó una adaptación de la clasificación a escenarios ortopédicos generales y específicos de las diferentes subespecialidades ortopédicas. Esta clasificación puede ser una herramienta útil para documentar complicaciones en cirugía ortopédica.   Palabras claves: complicaciones posoperatorias; ortopedia; sistema de salud     Introdução: As complicações pós-operatórias constituem qualquer desvio do estado pós-operatório normal. O registro destes permanece um desafio, vários sistemas de classificação foram propostos, no entanto, estes não foram validados em todas as especialidades cirúrgicas. Clavien e Dindo desenvolveram um sistema para Cirurgia Geral e foram adotados em diferentes áreas. No entanto, essa classificação não foi adaptada à ortopedia. O objetivo deste estudo foi adaptar a classificação de Clavien-Dindo aos cenários ortopédicos e determinar a confiabilidade intra e interobservadores.  Materiais e Métodos: A classificação de Clavien Dindo foi adaptada aos cenários ortopédicos. Dez observadores com diferentes graus de treinamento e experiência foram selecionados para avaliar o ranking. 48 cenários clínicos simulados de complicações e outros resultados negativos foram enviados eletronicamente de forma independente. Uma segunda rodada de pontuação foi realizada 30 dias depois para avaliar a concordância intraobservador.  Resultados: Encontramos alta confiabilidade interobservador e intraobservador para a primeira e a segunda avaliação (Kappa 0,88 e 0,91, respectivamente). Além disso, a análise intraobservador mostrou uma correlação muito boa (Kappa 0,93).  Discussão: A classificação de Clavien-Dindo foi desenvolvida para cirurgia geral e tem sido amplamente aplicada nas diferentes subespecialidades cirúrgicas. Na ortopedia, essa classificação foi validada para cirurgias de quadril e pediatria. Portanto, nosso estudo envolveu uma adaptação da classificação a cenários ortopédicos gerais e específicos das diferentes subespecialidades ortopédicas. Essa classificação pode ser uma ferramenta útil para documentar complicações em cirurgia ortopédica.  Palavras-chave: complicações pós-operatórias; ortopedia; sistema de saúde   Universidad Nacional Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología 2020-08-21 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27931 10.31053/1853.0605.v77.n3.27931 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba.; Vol. 77 No. 3 (2020); 161-167 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba; Vol. 77 Núm. 3 (2020); 161-167 Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Córdoba; v. 77 n. 3 (2020); 161-167 1853-0605 0014-6722 10.31053/1853.0605.v77.n3 eng https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27931/31060 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27931/30717 Derechos de autor 2020 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0