Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method
Introduction: Two different methods are used in goniometry of the ankle: the neutral zero method (N0M) and the bone reference method (BRM). In addition, the N0M has a subtype (N0I), with a different technique. Purpose: To determine the average of the amplitude of flexion-extension of the ankle, meas...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27655 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R327-article-27655 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-327 |
| container_title_str |
Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
arthrometry articular articular range of motion ankle applied kinesiology artrometría articular rango del movimiento articular tobillo quinesiología aplicada artrometria articular amplitude de movimento articular tornozelo cinesiologia aplicada |
| spellingShingle |
arthrometry articular articular range of motion ankle applied kinesiology artrometría articular rango del movimiento articular tobillo quinesiología aplicada artrometria articular amplitude de movimento articular tornozelo cinesiologia aplicada Catelotti, Franco Trossero, Silvina Marcos, Roxana Alicia Romero, Daniel Lo Presti, María Silvina Barboza, Gladys Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| topic_facet |
arthrometry articular articular range of motion ankle applied kinesiology artrometría articular rango del movimiento articular tobillo quinesiología aplicada artrometria articular amplitude de movimento articular tornozelo cinesiologia aplicada |
| author |
Catelotti, Franco Trossero, Silvina Marcos, Roxana Alicia Romero, Daniel Lo Presti, María Silvina Barboza, Gladys |
| author_facet |
Catelotti, Franco Trossero, Silvina Marcos, Roxana Alicia Romero, Daniel Lo Presti, María Silvina Barboza, Gladys |
| author_sort |
Catelotti, Franco |
| title |
Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| title_short |
Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| title_full |
Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| title_fullStr |
Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| title_sort |
goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| description |
Introduction: Two different methods are used in goniometry of the ankle: the neutral zero method (N0M) and the bone reference method (BRM). In addition, the N0M has a subtype (N0I), with a different technique. Purpose: To determine the average of the amplitude of flexion-extension of the ankle, measured in different body positions, using N0M, N0I and BRM, in young adults of both sexes, with the objective of providing evidence so that the ankle goniometry is more reliable. Material and methods: 190 students from the School of Kinesiology and Physiotherapy were studied, using the three methods of joint measurement in 4 different body positions; the amplitude of flex-extension in an ankle per student was evaluated. Results: In most positions, the measurements were different in the three methods compared (P<0.05). The M0 and M0I methods yielded similar results in some comparisons. The patient's position also significantly influences the result obtained. Dorsal ankle flexion was similar between men and women in most of the methods and positions; the plantar flexion that was greater in women in all cases (P<0.0001). The full flex-extension value, in most cases, was higher in women than in men (P<0.001). Conclusions: Both the method and the patient's position significantly influence the results of the goniometric measurement. Gender influences the joint width of the plantar ankle flexion, regardless of the measurement method used. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27655 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT catelottifranco goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT trosserosilvina goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT marcosroxanaalicia goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT romerodaniel goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT loprestimariasilvina goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT barbozagladys goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT catelottifranco goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT trosserosilvina goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT marcosroxanaalicia goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT romerodaniel goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT loprestimariasilvina goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT barbozagladys goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT catelottifranco goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 AT trosserosilvina goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 AT marcosroxanaalicia goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 AT romerodaniel goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 AT loprestimariasilvina goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 AT barbozagladys goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T21:01:41Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T21:01:41Z |
| _version_ |
1809210200740069376 |
| spelling |
I10-R327-article-276552024-08-27T18:27:36Z Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method Goniometría del movimiento de flexo-extensión de tobillo: análisis comparativo entre método de referencias óseas y método 0 neutral Goniometria do movimento de flexão-extensão do tornozelo: análise comparativa entre o método de referência óssea e o método neutro 0 Catelotti, Franco Trossero, Silvina Marcos, Roxana Alicia Romero, Daniel Lo Presti, María Silvina Barboza, Gladys arthrometry articular articular range of motion ankle applied kinesiology artrometría articular rango del movimiento articular tobillo quinesiología aplicada artrometria articular amplitude de movimento articular tornozelo cinesiologia aplicada Introduction: Two different methods are used in goniometry of the ankle: the neutral zero method (N0M) and the bone reference method (BRM). In addition, the N0M has a subtype (N0I), with a different technique. Purpose: To determine the average of the amplitude of flexion-extension of the ankle, measured in different body positions, using N0M, N0I and BRM, in young adults of both sexes, with the objective of providing evidence so that the ankle goniometry is more reliable. Material and methods: 190 students from the School of Kinesiology and Physiotherapy were studied, using the three methods of joint measurement in 4 different body positions; the amplitude of flex-extension in an ankle per student was evaluated. Results: In most positions, the measurements were different in the three methods compared (P<0.05). The M0 and M0I methods yielded similar results in some comparisons. The patient's position also significantly influences the result obtained. Dorsal ankle flexion was similar between men and women in most of the methods and positions; the plantar flexion that was greater in women in all cases (P<0.0001). The full flex-extension value, in most cases, was higher in women than in men (P<0.001). Conclusions: Both the method and the patient's position significantly influence the results of the goniometric measurement. Gender influences the joint width of the plantar ankle flexion, regardless of the measurement method used. Introducción: En la goniometría de tobillo se utilizan dos métodos diferentes, el método cero neutral (M0N) y el método de referencias óseas (MRO). Además, el M0N tiene un subtipo (M0I), con una técnica diferente. Objetivo: Determinar el promedio de la amplitud de flexo-extensión de tobillo, medida en diferentes posiciones corporales, utilizando M0N, M0I y MRO, en adultos jóvenes de ambos sexos, con el objetivo de aportar evidencia para que la goniometría de tobillo sea más fiable. Material y métodos: Se estudiaron 190 alumnos de la Escuela de Kinesiología y Fisioterapia, utilizando los tres métodos de medición articular en 4 posiciones corporales diferentes; se evaluó la amplitud de flexo-extensión en un tobillo por alumno. Resultados: En la mayoría de las posiciones, las mediciones fueron diferentes en los tres métodos comparados (P<0,05). Los métodos M0 y M0I arrojaron resultados similares en algunas comparaciones puntuales. La posición del paciente también influye significativamente en el resultado obtenido. La flexión dorsal de tobillo fue similar entre hombres y mujeres en la mayoría de los métodos y posiciones del paciente, no así la flexión plantar que fue mayor en las mujeres en todos los casos (P<0,0001). El valor completo de flexo-extensión, en la mayoría de los casos fue mayor en las mujeres que en los varones (P<0,001). Conclusiones: Tanto el método como la posición del paciente influyen significativamente en los resultados de la medición goniométrica. El género influye en la amplitud articular de la flexión plantar de tobillo, independientemente del método de medición utilizado. Introdução: Dois métodos diferentes são usados na goniometria do tornozelo: o método zero neutro (M0N) e o método de referência óssea (MRO). Além disso, o M0N possui um subtipo (M0I), com uma técnica diferente. Objetivo: Determinar a média da amplitude de extensão-flexão do tornozelo, medida em diferentes posições corporais, utilizando M0N, M0I e MRO, em adultos jovens de ambos os sexos, com o objetivo de fornecer evidências para que a goniometria do tornozelo seja mais confiável. Material e métodos: foram estudados 190 alunos da Escola de Cinesiologia e Fisioterapia, utilizando os três métodos de medida articular em 4 posições corporais diferentes; foi avaliada a amplitude da flexo-extensão no tornozelo por aluno. Resultados: Na maioria das posições, as medidas foram diferentes nos três métodos comparados (P<0,05). Os métodos M0 e M0I produziram resultados semelhantes em algumas comparações. A posição do paciente também influencia significativamente o resultado obtido. A flexão do tornozelo dorsal foi semelhante entre homens e mulheres na maioria dos métodos e posições do paciente, mas não a flexão plantar que foi maior nas mulheres em todos os casos (P<0,0001). O valor total da flexo-extensão, na maioria dos casos, foi maior em mulheres do que em homens (P<0,001). Conclusões: O método e a posição do paciente influenciam significativamente os resultados da medida goniométrica. O gênero influencia a largura articular da flexão plantar do tornozelo, independentemente do método de medição utilizado. Universidad Nacional Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología 2020-12-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27655 10.31053/1853.0605.v77.n4.27655 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba.; Vol. 77 No. 4 (2020); 276-280 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba; Vol. 77 Núm. 4 (2020); 276-280 Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Córdoba; v. 77 n. 4 (2020); 276-280 1853-0605 0014-6722 10.31053/1853.0605.v77.n4 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27655/32414 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27655/32437 Derechos de autor 2020 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |