Contributions and Discussions in Zooarchaeology from the Museo de La Plata

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

Zooarchaeology has become one of the pillars of archeology of the twentieth century (Borrero 2011), and in a broad sense, it is understood as the subdiscipline that studies the remains of animals found in archaeological sites. Following Lyman (1994), we can consider two main objectives of the study...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marchionni, Laura, Mange, Emiliano, García Añino, Eloísa
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Estudios Históricos. UA CONICET 2019
Materias:
Zooarchaeology
La Plata Museum
Zooarqueoogía
Museo de la Plata
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/comechingonia/article/view/27482
Aporte de:
Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R319-article-27482
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R319-article-274822025-08-04T15:50:25Z Contributions and Discussions in Zooarchaeology from the Museo de La Plata Aportes y Discusiones en Zooarqueología desde el Museo de La Plata Marchionni, Laura Mange, Emiliano García Añino, Eloísa Zooarchaeology La Plata Museum Zooarqueoogía Museo de la Plata Zooarchaeology has become one of the pillars of archeology of the twentieth century (Borrero 2011), and in a broad sense, it is understood as the subdiscipline that studies the remains of animals found in archaeological sites. Following Lyman (1994), we can consider two main objectives of the study of archaeofaunas: the reconstruction of paleoecological conditions and subsistence patterns. In that same sense, Mengoni Goñalons (2007: 14) highlights two variants within the disciplinary field: zooarcheology proper and biological archeology. While the first, our focus is on the cultural relevance of bone remains, seeks to know the different forms of interaction between human groups and animals over time, including from changes in subsistence and mobility strategies to aspects Social and symbolic, the second, is more interested in comparing the distributions of wildlife in the past and in the present. Both perspectives are complementary and synergistic (Borrero 2011; Mengoni Goñalons 2007), and their objectives go beyond the necessary exhaustive analysis of faunal remains found in archaeological sites and that the interests of zooarcheology are shared by those of other disciplines, which according to Borrero (2011) gives him the characteristic of transdiciplinaria. Because of this, the interaction with information from other materials and disciplines (for example, ethnohistory, ethnoarcheology), becomes relevant to these purposes. La zooarqueología se ha constituido como uno de los pilares de la arqueología del siglo XX (Borrero 2011), y en un sentido amplio, es entendida como la subdisciplina que estudia los restos de animales que encontramos en los sitios arqueológicos. Siguiendo a Lyman (1994), podemos considerar dos objetivos principales del estudio de las arqueofaunas: la reconstrucción de las condiciones paleoecológicas y de los patrones de subsistencia. En ese mismo sentido, Mengoni Goñalons (2007: 14) destaca dos variantes dentro del campo disciplinario: la zooarqueología propiamente dicha y la arqueología biológica. Mientras que la primera, cuyo foco está puesto en la relevancia cultural de los restos óseos, busca conocer las distintas formas de interacción entre los grupos humanos y los animales a través del tiempo, incluyendo desde cambios en las estrategias de subsistencia y movilidad hasta aspectos sociales y simbólicos, la segunda, está más interesada en la comparación de las distribuciones de la fauna en el pasado y en el presente. Ambas perspectivas son complementarias y sinérgicas (Borrero 2011; Mengoni Goñalons 2007), y sus objetivos van más allá del necesario análisis exhaustivo de restos faunísticos hallados en sitios arqueológicos ya que los intereses de la zooarqueología son compartidos por los de otras disciplinas, lo que según Borrero (2011) le da la característica de transdiciplinaria. Debido a ello, la interacción con información de otros materiales y disciplinas (e.g. etnohistoria, etnoarqueología), se vuelve relevante a estos fines. Centro de Estudios Históricos. UA CONICET 2019-12-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/comechingonia/article/view/27482 10.37603/2250.7728.v23.n2.27482 Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2019): Comechingonia Revista de Arqueología. ; 5-10 Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología; Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2019): Comechingonia Revista de Arqueología. ; 5-10 Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología; v. 23 n. 2 (2019): Comechingonia Revista de Arqueología. ; 5-10 2250-7728 0326-7911 10.37603/2250.7728.v23.n2 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/comechingonia/article/view/27482/29031
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-319
container_title_str Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Zooarchaeology
La Plata Museum
Zooarqueoogía
Museo de la Plata
spellingShingle Zooarchaeology
La Plata Museum
Zooarqueoogía
Museo de la Plata
Marchionni, Laura
Mange, Emiliano
García Añino, Eloísa
Contributions and Discussions in Zooarchaeology from the Museo de La Plata
topic_facet Zooarchaeology
La Plata Museum
Zooarqueoogía
Museo de la Plata
author Marchionni, Laura
Mange, Emiliano
García Añino, Eloísa
author_facet Marchionni, Laura
Mange, Emiliano
García Añino, Eloísa
author_sort Marchionni, Laura
title Contributions and Discussions in Zooarchaeology from the Museo de La Plata
title_short Contributions and Discussions in Zooarchaeology from the Museo de La Plata
title_full Contributions and Discussions in Zooarchaeology from the Museo de La Plata
title_fullStr Contributions and Discussions in Zooarchaeology from the Museo de La Plata
title_full_unstemmed Contributions and Discussions in Zooarchaeology from the Museo de La Plata
title_sort contributions and discussions in zooarchaeology from the museo de la plata
description Zooarchaeology has become one of the pillars of archeology of the twentieth century (Borrero 2011), and in a broad sense, it is understood as the subdiscipline that studies the remains of animals found in archaeological sites. Following Lyman (1994), we can consider two main objectives of the study of archaeofaunas: the reconstruction of paleoecological conditions and subsistence patterns. In that same sense, Mengoni Goñalons (2007: 14) highlights two variants within the disciplinary field: zooarcheology proper and biological archeology. While the first, our focus is on the cultural relevance of bone remains, seeks to know the different forms of interaction between human groups and animals over time, including from changes in subsistence and mobility strategies to aspects Social and symbolic, the second, is more interested in comparing the distributions of wildlife in the past and in the present. Both perspectives are complementary and synergistic (Borrero 2011; Mengoni Goñalons 2007), and their objectives go beyond the necessary exhaustive analysis of faunal remains found in archaeological sites and that the interests of zooarcheology are shared by those of other disciplines, which according to Borrero (2011) gives him the characteristic of transdiciplinaria. Because of this, the interaction with information from other materials and disciplines (for example, ethnohistory, ethnoarcheology), becomes relevant to these purposes.
publisher Centro de Estudios Históricos. UA CONICET
publishDate 2019
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/comechingonia/article/view/27482
work_keys_str_mv AT marchionnilaura contributionsanddiscussionsinzooarchaeologyfromthemuseodelaplata
AT mangeemiliano contributionsanddiscussionsinzooarchaeologyfromthemuseodelaplata
AT garciaaninoeloisa contributionsanddiscussionsinzooarchaeologyfromthemuseodelaplata
AT marchionnilaura aportesydiscusionesenzooarqueologiadesdeelmuseodelaplata
AT mangeemiliano aportesydiscusionesenzooarqueologiadesdeelmuseodelaplata
AT garciaaninoeloisa aportesydiscusionesenzooarqueologiadesdeelmuseodelaplata
first_indexed 2024-09-03T20:43:53Z
last_indexed 2025-08-10T05:15:16Z
_version_ 1841583888581787648

Ejemplares similares