Power and sociability in Argentina in the 1930s. The Uriburu and Justo Governments
The aim of this research is to analyze the differences in styles in which José Félix Uriburu and Agustín P. Justo practiced politics and constructed power in their governments, dealing with some theoretical aspects of Georg Simmel work. This sociological analysis of an historic phenomenon considers...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos S. A. Segreti
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuarioceh/article/view/23210 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The aim of this research is to analyze the differences in styles in which José Félix Uriburu and Agustín P. Justo practiced politics and constructed power in their governments, dealing with some theoretical aspects of Georg Simmel work. This sociological analysis of an historic phenomenon considers the events as a process, a reality that develops in a steady dynamism. People and society are understood as parts that contain and influence each other in a definite time and space. The starting point is the theoretical analysis on «the ones who are in charge of» our country. It collects and combines ideas of Gaetano Mosca, Vilfredo Pareto and Carl Wright Mills -classical authors of the elite- in order to outline a conceptual definition of the group under study. It continues with conceptual definitions of Georg Simmel and Nobert Elias, used in the study of the period between 1930-1938, combining empiria and theory to understand part of our past from a sociological point of view. |
|---|