The Secret Report to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the official perspective of the Argentine Communist Party. Reception and first repercussions
The aim of this article is to inquire about the first interpretations of the Communist Party of Argentina (PCA) on the subject of the Khrushchev’s report on February 25, 1956. Stalin’s death was marked as an opportunity from which the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (PCUS) should break with the...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos S. A. Segreti
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuarioceh/article/view/22170 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The aim of this article is to inquire about the first interpretations of the Communist Party of Argentina (PCA) on the subject of the Khrushchev’s report on February 25, 1956. Stalin’s death was marked as an opportunity from which the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (PCUS) should break with the logic inherent in the cult of personality and could recover the “purity” of Marxism-Leninism. The criticism to the “excesses” of mature Stalinism and the reforms in the early part of the process of “de-Stalinization”, generated a number of debates and reflection within the international communist movement. The central issues addressed in the XX Congress of the PCUS could not be obviated by the PCA, and the treatment given to them by the latter are the subject of analysis of this study. |
|---|