The Secret Report to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the official perspective of the Argentine Communist Party. Reception and first repercussions

The aim of this article is to inquire about the first interpretations of the Communist Party of Argentina (PCA) on the subject of the Khrushchev’s report on February 25, 1956. Stalin’s death was marked as an opportunity from which the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (PCUS) should break with the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Piemonte, Víctor Augusto
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos S. A. Segreti 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuarioceh/article/view/22170
Aporte de:
id I10-R307-article-22170
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R307-article-221702021-06-01T21:54:36Z The Secret Report to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the official perspective of the Argentine Communist Party. Reception and first repercussions El Informe Secreto al XX Congreso del Partido Comunista de la Unión Soviética en la perspectiva oficial del Partido Comunista Argentino. Recepción y primeras repercusiones Piemonte, Víctor Augusto Communist Party of Argentina Communist Party of the Soviet Union secret speech stalinism Partido Comunista Argentino Partido Comunista de la Unión Soviética informe secreto stalinismo The aim of this article is to inquire about the first interpretations of the Communist Party of Argentina (PCA) on the subject of the Khrushchev’s report on February 25, 1956. Stalin’s death was marked as an opportunity from which the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (PCUS) should break with the logic inherent in the cult of personality and could recover the “purity” of Marxism-Leninism. The criticism to the “excesses” of mature Stalinism and the reforms in the early part of the process of “de-Stalinization”, generated a number of debates and reflection within the international communist movement. The central issues addressed in the XX Congress of the PCUS could not be obviated by the PCA, and the treatment given to them by the latter are the subject of analysis of this study. Comunista de la Argentina (PCA) a propósito del informe presentado por Khrushchev el 25 de febrero de 1956. La muerte de Stalin era señalada allí como la oportunidad a partir de la cual el Partido Comunista de la Unión Soviética (PCUS) debía romper con la lógica inherente al culto a la personalidad y recuperar la “pureza” del marxismo-leninismo. Las críticas a los “excesos” del stalinismo, así como las primeras reformas realizadas en el marco del proceso de “desestalinización”, generaron un cúmulo de discusiones y reflexiones al interior del movimiento comunista internacional. Las cuestiones centrales abordadas en el XX Congreso del PCUS no pudieron ser tampoco obviadas por el PCA, y el tratamiento que les fue dispensado por este último será materia de análisis del presente trabajo. Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos S. A. Segreti 2018-12-06 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículos de investigación libres application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuarioceh/article/view/22170 10.52885/2683-9164.v0.n13.22170 Anuario del Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos S. A. Segreti; Núm. 13 (2013); 223-241 2683-9164 1666-6836 10.52885/2683-9164.v0.n13 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuarioceh/article/view/22170/21777 Derechos de autor 2013 Víctor Augusto Piemonte
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-307
container_title_str Anuario del Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos S. A. Segreti
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Communist Party of Argentina
Communist Party of the Soviet Union
secret speech
stalinism
Partido Comunista Argentino
Partido Comunista de la Unión Soviética
informe secreto
stalinismo
spellingShingle Communist Party of Argentina
Communist Party of the Soviet Union
secret speech
stalinism
Partido Comunista Argentino
Partido Comunista de la Unión Soviética
informe secreto
stalinismo
Piemonte, Víctor Augusto
The Secret Report to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the official perspective of the Argentine Communist Party. Reception and first repercussions
topic_facet Communist Party of Argentina
Communist Party of the Soviet Union
secret speech
stalinism
Partido Comunista Argentino
Partido Comunista de la Unión Soviética
informe secreto
stalinismo
author Piemonte, Víctor Augusto
author_facet Piemonte, Víctor Augusto
author_sort Piemonte, Víctor Augusto
title The Secret Report to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the official perspective of the Argentine Communist Party. Reception and first repercussions
title_short The Secret Report to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the official perspective of the Argentine Communist Party. Reception and first repercussions
title_full The Secret Report to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the official perspective of the Argentine Communist Party. Reception and first repercussions
title_fullStr The Secret Report to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the official perspective of the Argentine Communist Party. Reception and first repercussions
title_full_unstemmed The Secret Report to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the official perspective of the Argentine Communist Party. Reception and first repercussions
title_sort secret report to the 20th congress of the communist party of the soviet union in the official perspective of the argentine communist party. reception and first repercussions
description The aim of this article is to inquire about the first interpretations of the Communist Party of Argentina (PCA) on the subject of the Khrushchev’s report on February 25, 1956. Stalin’s death was marked as an opportunity from which the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (PCUS) should break with the logic inherent in the cult of personality and could recover the “purity” of Marxism-Leninism. The criticism to the “excesses” of mature Stalinism and the reforms in the early part of the process of “de-Stalinization”, generated a number of debates and reflection within the international communist movement. The central issues addressed in the XX Congress of the PCUS could not be obviated by the PCA, and the treatment given to them by the latter are the subject of analysis of this study.
publisher Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos S. A. Segreti
publishDate 2018
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuarioceh/article/view/22170
work_keys_str_mv AT piemontevictoraugusto thesecretreporttothe20thcongressofthecommunistpartyofthesovietunionintheofficialperspectiveoftheargentinecommunistpartyreceptionandfirstrepercussions
AT piemontevictoraugusto elinformesecretoalxxcongresodelpartidocomunistadelaunionsovieticaenlaperspectivaoficialdelpartidocomunistaargentinorecepcionyprimerasrepercusiones
AT piemontevictoraugusto secretreporttothe20thcongressofthecommunistpartyofthesovietunionintheofficialperspectiveoftheargentinecommunistpartyreceptionandfirstrepercussions
first_indexed 2024-09-03T20:25:40Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T20:25:40Z
_version_ 1809207935274844160