Rebuking the Kuhnian disciplinary matrix in the light of feminist glances
This work addresses the question of who thinks when one thinks professionally. To bring an answer closer, it show aspects of Kuhnian theoretical development in dialogue with feminist postulates. It hypothesized that the disciplinary matrix is what the professional thinks, shaping the thinking that t...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/36210 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R299-article-36210 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R299-article-362102026-05-22T18:34:30Z Rebuking the Kuhnian disciplinary matrix in the light of feminist glances Repensando la matriz disciplinar Kuhniana a la luz de las miradas feministas Jaime, Jésica Jaime, Jésica matriz disciplinar sujeto social sujeto plural pensamiento crítico feminismo disciplinary matrix social subject plural subject critical thinking feminism This work addresses the question of who thinks when one thinks professionally. To bring an answer closer, it show aspects of Kuhnian theoretical development in dialogue with feminist postulates. It hypothesized that the disciplinary matrix is what the professional thinks, shaping the thinking that the psychologist has of the patient and influencing the practices that emerge from their therapeutic intervention.In the first place, it intend to reveal how the ontology adopted by the professional is the underlying ontology of the metaphysical models accepted by the disciplinary matrix. Second, motivate a reflection on the need to embrace critical thinking in the professional role.To achieve the stated purpose, it analyses the Kuhn ́s The structure of scientific revolutions(1962) in tension with Mapuche epistemology and community intervention: contributions to cognitive justice from the social work of Alicia Rain Rain and Muñoz Arce (2017) and A decolonial proposal: provincializing feminismby María Clara Puigdomenech (2019). El presente trabajo aborda el interrogante sobre quién piensa cuando se piensa profesionalmente. Para acercar una respuesta, se muestran aspectos del desarrollo teórico kuhniano en diálogo con postulados feministas. Se plantea la hipótesis de que la matriz disciplinar es la que piensa por el/la profesional, configurando el pensamiento que tiene el psicólogo/a del paciente e influyendo en las prácticas que se desprenden de su intervención terapéutica.En primer lugar, se pretende revelar de qué modo la ontología adoptada por el/la profesional es la ontología que subyace de los modelos ontológicos aceptados por la matriz disciplinar. En segundo lugar, motivar una reflexión respecto a la necesidad de abrazar un pensamiento crítico en el rol profesional.Para lograr el propósito expuesto, se analizan los textos de Kuhn La estructura de las revoluciones científicas (1962), en tensión con Epistemología mapuche e intervención comunitaria: aportes a la justicia cognitiva desde el trabajo social de Alicia Rain Rain y Muñoz Arce (2017) y Una propuesta decolonial: provincializar al feminismo de María Clara Puigdomenech (2019). Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 2021-12-27 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/36210 Heterocronías. Feminismos y Epistemologías del Sur; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2021): Heterocronías Vol. 3, N° 2; 52-63 Heterocronías. Feminisms and Epistemologies of the South; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Heterocronías Vol. 3, N° 2; 52-63 2684-0502 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/36210/36752 Derechos de autor 2021 Heterocronías https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-299 |
| container_title_str |
Heterocronías. Feminismos y Epistemologías del Sur |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
matriz disciplinar sujeto social sujeto plural pensamiento crítico feminismo disciplinary matrix social subject plural subject critical thinking feminism |
| spellingShingle |
matriz disciplinar sujeto social sujeto plural pensamiento crítico feminismo disciplinary matrix social subject plural subject critical thinking feminism Jaime, Jésica Jaime, Jésica Rebuking the Kuhnian disciplinary matrix in the light of feminist glances |
| topic_facet |
matriz disciplinar sujeto social sujeto plural pensamiento crítico feminismo disciplinary matrix social subject plural subject critical thinking feminism |
| author |
Jaime, Jésica Jaime, Jésica |
| author_facet |
Jaime, Jésica Jaime, Jésica |
| author_sort |
Jaime, Jésica |
| title |
Rebuking the Kuhnian disciplinary matrix in the light of feminist glances |
| title_short |
Rebuking the Kuhnian disciplinary matrix in the light of feminist glances |
| title_full |
Rebuking the Kuhnian disciplinary matrix in the light of feminist glances |
| title_fullStr |
Rebuking the Kuhnian disciplinary matrix in the light of feminist glances |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Rebuking the Kuhnian disciplinary matrix in the light of feminist glances |
| title_sort |
rebuking the kuhnian disciplinary matrix in the light of feminist glances |
| description |
This work addresses the question of who thinks when one thinks professionally. To bring an answer closer, it show aspects of Kuhnian theoretical development in dialogue with feminist postulates. It hypothesized that the disciplinary matrix is what the professional thinks, shaping the thinking that the psychologist has of the patient and influencing the practices that emerge from their therapeutic intervention.In the first place, it intend to reveal how the ontology adopted by the professional is the underlying ontology of the metaphysical models accepted by the disciplinary matrix. Second, motivate a reflection on the need to embrace critical thinking in the professional role.To achieve the stated purpose, it analyses the Kuhn ́s The structure of scientific revolutions(1962) in tension with Mapuche epistemology and community intervention: contributions to cognitive justice from the social work of Alicia Rain Rain and Muñoz Arce (2017) and A decolonial proposal: provincializing feminismby María Clara Puigdomenech (2019). |
| publisher |
Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/36210 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT jaimejesica rebukingthekuhniandisciplinarymatrixinthelightoffeministglances AT jaimejesica rebukingthekuhniandisciplinarymatrixinthelightoffeministglances AT jaimejesica repensandolamatrizdisciplinarkuhnianaalaluzdelasmiradasfeministas AT jaimejesica repensandolamatrizdisciplinarkuhnianaalaluzdelasmiradasfeministas |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T20:21:07Z |
| last_indexed |
2026-05-27T05:23:58Z |
| _version_ |
1866317890338160640 |