Labeling as a form of symbolic violence

Sociological questions regarding deviating conducts center around inquiries related to why people act the way they act, transgressing norms accepted as normal. Not all deviating conducts are criminal. This classification derives from the rules that have been previously established by a social group...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyadjian, Elizabeth Silvia, Salomón, Rita Esther
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/31615
Aporte de:
id I10-R299-article-31615
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R299-article-316152026-05-22T18:33:39Z Labeling as a form of symbolic violence El etiquetamiento como forma de violencia simbólica Boyadjian, Elizabeth Silvia Salomón, Rita Esther Boyadjian, Elizabeth Silvia Salomón, Rita Esther violencia simbólica etiquetamiento reproducción social habitus symbolic violence labeling social reproduction habitus Sociological questions regarding deviating conducts center around inquiries related to why people act the way they act, transgressing norms accepted as normal. Not all deviating conducts are criminal. This classification derives from the rules that have been previously established by a social group and, as a consequence, who infringes the norm is labeled as deviating. In this work we intend to identify how the process of labeling takes place and how such classification depends on the rules a specific social group establishes. Our heuristics hold that the act of labeling is an act of symbolic violence since it uses the force of the symbolic power available in one field and it establishes it as a habitus. This work seeks to delineate both the field of struggle where the game of labeled and labelers is produced, and the way in which the labeling is socially reproduced. To achieve our goal, at a first instance, we reconstructed the labeling theoryproposed by Becker (1963) which puts deviation as a collective action. This theory takes into consideration the answers of others to the actions of the deviated as well as the way they are evaluated by others and how this affects prestige and rank. In a second instance, some concepts by Bourdieu (1989) are also reconstructed, such as symbolic violence, field And social reproduction in tandem with the labeling ́s theory.  Los interrogantes sociológicos sobre conductas desviadas giran en torno a preguntas de por qué la gente actúa como actúa, transgrediendo las normas aceptadas como normales. No toda conducta desviada es delictiva. Esta clasificación se deriva de reglas que previamente han sido establecidas por un grupo social y, como consecuencia, aquel que infringe la norma es etiquetado como desviado.En este trabajo nos proponemos identificar cómo se da el proceso de etiquetamiento y cómo dicha clasificación depende de las reglas que establece un grupo social determinado. Nuestra heurística sostiene que la acción de etiquetar es un acto de violencia simbólica, dado que utiliza la fuerza del poder simbólico que circula en un campo y lo establece como un habitus. Se procura delinear el campo de lucha donde se produce el juego de los etiquetados y de quienes etiquetan, así como la manera en que se reproduce socialmente el rótulo. Para lograr nuestro objetivo, en un primer momento reconstruimos la teoría del etiquetamiento de Becker (1963) que plantea la desviación como una acción colectiva. Esta teoría, tiene en cuenta la respuesta de los otros sobre las acciones realizadas por los desviados, cómo son evaluados por quienes los rodean y cómo afecta el prestigio y el rango. En un segundo momento, se reconstruyen algunos conceptos de Bourdieu (1989) tales como violencia simbólica, campo de juego y reproducción social en articulación con la teoría del etiquetamiento. Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 2020-12-21 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/31615 Heterocronías. Feminismos y Epistemologías del Sur; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2020); 22-32 Heterocronías. Feminisms and Epistemologies of the South; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020); 22-32 2684-0502 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/31615/32382 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-299
container_title_str Heterocronías. Feminismos y Epistemologías del Sur
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic violencia simbólica
etiquetamiento
reproducción social
habitus
symbolic violence
labeling
social reproduction
habitus
spellingShingle violencia simbólica
etiquetamiento
reproducción social
habitus
symbolic violence
labeling
social reproduction
habitus
Boyadjian, Elizabeth Silvia
Salomón, Rita Esther
Boyadjian, Elizabeth Silvia
Salomón, Rita Esther
Labeling as a form of symbolic violence
topic_facet violencia simbólica
etiquetamiento
reproducción social
habitus
symbolic violence
labeling
social reproduction
habitus
author Boyadjian, Elizabeth Silvia
Salomón, Rita Esther
Boyadjian, Elizabeth Silvia
Salomón, Rita Esther
author_facet Boyadjian, Elizabeth Silvia
Salomón, Rita Esther
Boyadjian, Elizabeth Silvia
Salomón, Rita Esther
author_sort Boyadjian, Elizabeth Silvia
title Labeling as a form of symbolic violence
title_short Labeling as a form of symbolic violence
title_full Labeling as a form of symbolic violence
title_fullStr Labeling as a form of symbolic violence
title_full_unstemmed Labeling as a form of symbolic violence
title_sort labeling as a form of symbolic violence
description Sociological questions regarding deviating conducts center around inquiries related to why people act the way they act, transgressing norms accepted as normal. Not all deviating conducts are criminal. This classification derives from the rules that have been previously established by a social group and, as a consequence, who infringes the norm is labeled as deviating. In this work we intend to identify how the process of labeling takes place and how such classification depends on the rules a specific social group establishes. Our heuristics hold that the act of labeling is an act of symbolic violence since it uses the force of the symbolic power available in one field and it establishes it as a habitus. This work seeks to delineate both the field of struggle where the game of labeled and labelers is produced, and the way in which the labeling is socially reproduced. To achieve our goal, at a first instance, we reconstructed the labeling theoryproposed by Becker (1963) which puts deviation as a collective action. This theory takes into consideration the answers of others to the actions of the deviated as well as the way they are evaluated by others and how this affects prestige and rank. In a second instance, some concepts by Bourdieu (1989) are also reconstructed, such as symbolic violence, field And social reproduction in tandem with the labeling ́s theory. 
publisher Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
publishDate 2020
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/31615
work_keys_str_mv AT boyadjianelizabethsilvia labelingasaformofsymbolicviolence
AT salomonritaesther labelingasaformofsymbolicviolence
AT boyadjianelizabethsilvia labelingasaformofsymbolicviolence
AT salomonritaesther labelingasaformofsymbolicviolence
AT boyadjianelizabethsilvia eletiquetamientocomoformadeviolenciasimbolica
AT salomonritaesther eletiquetamientocomoformadeviolenciasimbolica
AT boyadjianelizabethsilvia eletiquetamientocomoformadeviolenciasimbolica
AT salomonritaesther eletiquetamientocomoformadeviolenciasimbolica
first_indexed 2024-09-03T20:21:02Z
last_indexed 2026-05-27T05:23:45Z
_version_ 1866317877364129792