LA SOCIOLINGÜISTICA EN EL ENTRAMADO DEL CHTHULUCENO: ¿CUÁL ES EL LENGUAJE NECESARIO PARA UN MUNDO COMPOST-ISTA?
Faced with the fact that we are currently living in a damaged world, it is necessary to elaborate answers to face this problem. In this way, Donna Haraway proposes her composer theory, where suggests the passage of the anthropocene and the capitalocene (which are constituted from the systematic dama...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicolog´ía de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/29758 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Faced with the fact that we are currently living in a damaged world, it is necessary to elaborate answers to face this problem. In this way, Donna Haraway proposes her composer theory, where suggests the passage of the anthropocene and the capitalocene (which are constituted from the systematic damage of the land and marginalization and exclusion of local practices and knowledge, from the perspective of a subject who can and bases everything, in the use of nature as an inexhaustible resource) towards a Chthulucene, which question the narratives created by the dominant hegemonic discourse. Learning to be truthful presents a tough generative joy, terror and critics thought in order to consider that rehabilitation and sustainability, in the midst of tissues of worlds affected but not entirely destroyed, are still in evolution. This would take us to a sort of composting, where practices and knowledge will be recovered in a kind of ecology. Likewise, a transformation of the language is necessary to question the anthropocene narrative and be able to point towards the creation of a new era given that it has always accompanied the progress of science, the creation of subjectivities, learning, communication, etc. and it has been –and continues being- an instrument for the marginalization and exclusion of social and political agents. Perhaps, what is necessary is to implement a sociolinguistics, who contemplates language in its complexity, and to question which has been imposed and standardized, supporting the different forms of colonization and epistemicide. |
|---|