FEDERALISM, RIGHTS, AND EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW. A LEGAL HISTORICAL APPROACH TO THE ARGENTINE CASE.

The Argentine constitutional model combines, as is well known, a federal political structure with some typical features of unitary systems. This paper analyzes the tension between the system of codified national substantive law and the preservation of provincial jurisdictions in the application of t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: AGÜERO, ALEJANDRO
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales - FD - UNC - CONICET 2023
Materias:
federalismo argentino
igualdad ante la ley
casación
Argentina, historia constitucional
argentine federalism
equality before the law
cassation
Argentina, constitutional history
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/40713
Aporte de:
Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R282-article-40713
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R282-article-407132023-07-04T18:41:10Z FEDERALISM, RIGHTS, AND EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW. A LEGAL HISTORICAL APPROACH TO THE ARGENTINE CASE. FEDERALISMO, DERECHOS E IGUALDAD ANTE LA LEY. APROXIMACIÓN HISTÓRICO JURÍDICA AL CASO ARGENTINO. AGÜERO, ALEJANDRO federalismo argentino igualdad ante la ley casación Argentina, historia constitucional argentine federalism equality before the law cassation Argentina, constitutional history The Argentine constitutional model combines, as is well known, a federal political structure with some typical features of unitary systems. This paper analyzes the tension between the system of codified national substantive law and the preservation of provincial jurisdictions in the application of the codes. It seeks to show that, as an effect of these tensions, the dominant interpretation has validated a constitutional assessment in which the organization of jurisdictional powers has greater relevance than the principle of equality before the law, with the consequent postponement of a basic principle of the liberal discourse. El modelo constitucional argentino combina, como se sabe, una estructura política federal con algunos rasgos típicos de los sistemas unitarios. Este trabajo analiza la tensión que se produce entre el sistema de derecho sustantivo nacional codificado y la reserva a favor de las jurisdicciones provinciales en la aplicación de los códigos. Procura mostrar que, como efecto de esas tensiones, la interpretación dominante ha convalidado una ponderación constitucional en la que la organización del poder jurisdiccional tiene mayor relevancia que el principio de igualdad ante la ley, con la consecuente postergación de un principio básico del discurso liberal. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales - FD - UNC - CONICET 2023-05-12 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/40713 Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; Núm. XXI (2023): ANUARIO XXI; 371-391 1667-6122 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/40713/40842 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-282
container_title_str Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic federalismo argentino
igualdad ante la ley
casación
Argentina, historia constitucional
argentine federalism
equality before the law
cassation
Argentina, constitutional history
spellingShingle federalismo argentino
igualdad ante la ley
casación
Argentina, historia constitucional
argentine federalism
equality before the law
cassation
Argentina, constitutional history
AGÜERO, ALEJANDRO
FEDERALISM, RIGHTS, AND EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW. A LEGAL HISTORICAL APPROACH TO THE ARGENTINE CASE.
topic_facet federalismo argentino
igualdad ante la ley
casación
Argentina, historia constitucional
argentine federalism
equality before the law
cassation
Argentina, constitutional history
author AGÜERO, ALEJANDRO
author_facet AGÜERO, ALEJANDRO
author_sort AGÜERO, ALEJANDRO
title FEDERALISM, RIGHTS, AND EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW. A LEGAL HISTORICAL APPROACH TO THE ARGENTINE CASE.
title_short FEDERALISM, RIGHTS, AND EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW. A LEGAL HISTORICAL APPROACH TO THE ARGENTINE CASE.
title_full FEDERALISM, RIGHTS, AND EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW. A LEGAL HISTORICAL APPROACH TO THE ARGENTINE CASE.
title_fullStr FEDERALISM, RIGHTS, AND EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW. A LEGAL HISTORICAL APPROACH TO THE ARGENTINE CASE.
title_full_unstemmed FEDERALISM, RIGHTS, AND EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW. A LEGAL HISTORICAL APPROACH TO THE ARGENTINE CASE.
title_sort federalism, rights, and equality before the law. a legal historical approach to the argentine case.
description The Argentine constitutional model combines, as is well known, a federal political structure with some typical features of unitary systems. This paper analyzes the tension between the system of codified national substantive law and the preservation of provincial jurisdictions in the application of the codes. It seeks to show that, as an effect of these tensions, the dominant interpretation has validated a constitutional assessment in which the organization of jurisdictional powers has greater relevance than the principle of equality before the law, with the consequent postponement of a basic principle of the liberal discourse.
publisher Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales - FD - UNC - CONICET
publishDate 2023
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/40713
work_keys_str_mv AT agueroalejandro federalismrightsandequalitybeforethelawalegalhistoricalapproachtotheargentinecase
AT agueroalejandro federalismoderechoseigualdadantelaleyaproximacionhistoricojuridicaalcasoargentino
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:38:49Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:38:49Z
_version_ 1809216311833657344

Ejemplares similares