Job quota for people with disabilities : An analysis of the interpretation made by the Superior Court of Justice of Cordoba

In 2019 the Superior Court of Justice of Córdoba (TSJ) ruled on the Labor Quota for Persons with Disabilities (art. 2, Law N° 5.624, modified by Law N° 8.834) on the basis of an appeal filed by the defendant (EPEC) against the sentence that gave rise to the protective action brought by the plaintiff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gastaldi, Paula
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales - FD - UNC - CONICET 2022
Materias:
discapacidad
cupo laboral
principio de igualdad
disability
job quota
principle of equality
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/37564
Aporte de:
Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R282-article-37564
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R282-article-375642022-05-17T20:00:56Z Job quota for people with disabilities : An analysis of the interpretation made by the Superior Court of Justice of Cordoba Cupo laboral de personas con discapacidad: Un análisis de la interpretación realizada por el Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Córdoba Gastaldi, Paula discapacidad cupo laboral principio de igualdad disability job quota principle of equality In 2019 the Superior Court of Justice of Córdoba (TSJ) ruled on the Labor Quota for Persons with Disabilities (art. 2, Law N° 5.624, modified by Law N° 8.834) on the basis of an appeal filed by the defendant (EPEC) against the sentence that gave rise to the protective action brought by the plaintiff, a person with a disability who intends to be hired by the EPEC. The TSJ has unanimously and jointly resolved to partially accept the appeal, ordering it to be revoked while ordering that the actor be incorporated into the permanent staff of the company due to a job disability quota. However, the Supreme Court held that, within one year from the ruling, EPEC must regulate and implement a selection mechanism, in compliance with the work quota for disability established by Law 5624. In this article I propose to reconstruct the reasoning of the court from a conception of the interpretation of Dworkin, investigating the scope and meaning of the principle of equality thrown by the court and its application in the matter of disability. En 2019 el Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Córdoba (TSJ) ha resuelto acerca del Cupo Laboral Personas con Discapacidad (art. 2, Ley Nº 5624, modificada por la Ley Nº 8834) sobre la base de un recurso de apelación formulado por la parte demandada (EPEC) contra la sentencia que hizo lugar a la acción de amparo promovida por la actora, una persona con discapacidad que pretende ser contratada por la EPEC. El TSJ ha resuelto, por unanimidad y en forma conjunta, hacer lugar en forma parcial al recurso de apelación planteado, ordenando se revoque la misma en tanto resolvió que se incorporara al actor en la planta permanente de la empresa por cupo de discapacidad laboral. Sin embargo, el TSJ sostuvo que, en el plazo de un año desde la sentencia, EPEC debe reglamentar e implementar un mecanismo de selección, en cumplimiento del cupo laboral por discapacidad fijado por la Ley 5.624. En este artículo propongo reconstruir el razonamiento del tribunal desde una concepción de la interpretación de Dworkin, indagando el alcance y sentido del principio de igualdad arrojada por el tribunal y su aplicación en materia de discapacidad. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales - FD - UNC - CONICET 2022-05-17 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/37564 Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; Núm. XX (2022): ANUARIO; 63-79 1667-6122 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/37564/37634 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-282
container_title_str Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic discapacidad
cupo laboral
principio de igualdad
disability
job quota
principle of equality
spellingShingle discapacidad
cupo laboral
principio de igualdad
disability
job quota
principle of equality
Gastaldi, Paula
Job quota for people with disabilities : An analysis of the interpretation made by the Superior Court of Justice of Cordoba
topic_facet discapacidad
cupo laboral
principio de igualdad
disability
job quota
principle of equality
author Gastaldi, Paula
author_facet Gastaldi, Paula
author_sort Gastaldi, Paula
title Job quota for people with disabilities : An analysis of the interpretation made by the Superior Court of Justice of Cordoba
title_short Job quota for people with disabilities : An analysis of the interpretation made by the Superior Court of Justice of Cordoba
title_full Job quota for people with disabilities : An analysis of the interpretation made by the Superior Court of Justice of Cordoba
title_fullStr Job quota for people with disabilities : An analysis of the interpretation made by the Superior Court of Justice of Cordoba
title_full_unstemmed Job quota for people with disabilities : An analysis of the interpretation made by the Superior Court of Justice of Cordoba
title_sort job quota for people with disabilities : an analysis of the interpretation made by the superior court of justice of cordoba
description In 2019 the Superior Court of Justice of Córdoba (TSJ) ruled on the Labor Quota for Persons with Disabilities (art. 2, Law N° 5.624, modified by Law N° 8.834) on the basis of an appeal filed by the defendant (EPEC) against the sentence that gave rise to the protective action brought by the plaintiff, a person with a disability who intends to be hired by the EPEC. The TSJ has unanimously and jointly resolved to partially accept the appeal, ordering it to be revoked while ordering that the actor be incorporated into the permanent staff of the company due to a job disability quota. However, the Supreme Court held that, within one year from the ruling, EPEC must regulate and implement a selection mechanism, in compliance with the work quota for disability established by Law 5624. In this article I propose to reconstruct the reasoning of the court from a conception of the interpretation of Dworkin, investigating the scope and meaning of the principle of equality thrown by the court and its application in the matter of disability.
publisher Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales - FD - UNC - CONICET
publishDate 2022
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/37564
work_keys_str_mv AT gastaldipaula jobquotaforpeoplewithdisabilitiesananalysisoftheinterpretationmadebythesuperiorcourtofjusticeofcordoba
AT gastaldipaula cupolaboraldepersonascondiscapacidadunanalisisdelainterpretacionrealizadaporeltribunalsuperiordejusticiadecordoba
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:38:42Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:38:42Z
_version_ 1809216304605822976

Ejemplares similares