The rule of clear mistake. An analisys from "Loyola" case

This paper analyzes the use of the rule of clear mistake on criminal decisions taken by Cordoba´s Superior Court of Justice. This rule states that an act can only be disregard when those who have the right to make laws have not merely made a mistake, but have made a very clear one, so clear that it...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Álvarez, Magdalena Inés, Ferniot, Cecilia
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales - FD - UNC - CONICET 2022
Materias:
Control de constitucionalidad
Clara equivocación del legislador
Autorrestricción del poder judicial
Deferencia legislativa
Laguna axiológica
Analogía in bonam partem
Constitutionality check
Rule of clear mistake
Judicial restraint
Deference to decisions made by political branches
Axiological gap
Bonam partem analogy
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/37563
Aporte de:
Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
Descripción
Sumario:This paper analyzes the use of the rule of clear mistake on criminal decisions taken by Cordoba´s Superior Court of Justice. This rule states that an act can only be disregard when those who have the right to make laws have not merely made a mistake, but have made a very clear one, so clear that it is not open to rational question. The local court takes the rule from a work published by Thayer in 1893. In this lines, we attend to show that the use of the rule made in case «Loyola» is opposite to Thayer’s proposal.

Ejemplares similares