Representation of Theseus from the Perspective of Ariadne, According to Catullus and Ovid

The myth of Ariadne and Theseus has been a source of inspiration for different authors throughout time. Our work engages with the reworking carried out by Catullus in his poem Carmen 64 and for Ovid in his production on Heroida X, in order to delve into the perspective of the voice of the heroine, A...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corbalán, María del Rosario, Albornoz, Anahí Yamile
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Letras 2024
Materias:
representación
Catulo
Ovidio
Ariadna
Teseo
Heroidas
Catullus
Ovid
Ariadne
Theseus
Heroides
representation
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/notalmargen/article/view/44779
Aporte de:
Nota al margen de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R278-article-44779
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R278-article-447792024-07-05T21:09:21Z Representation of Theseus from the Perspective of Ariadne, According to Catullus and Ovid Representación de Teseo desde la mirada de Ariadna, según Catulo y Ovidio Corbalán, María del Rosario Albornoz, Anahí Yamile representación Catulo Ovidio Ariadna Teseo Heroidas Catullus Ovid Ariadne Theseus Heroides representation The myth of Ariadne and Theseus has been a source of inspiration for different authors throughout time. Our work engages with the reworking carried out by Catullus in his poem Carmen 64 and for Ovid in his production on Heroida X, in order to delve into the perspective of the voice of the heroine, Ariadne, and how the hero figure is built through her gaze as a woman. These authors belong to two different historical and cultural moments in Rome, the Republic and the Empire, respectively. Therefore, we consider it relevant to contrast them, so it's possible for us to analyze how the versions adopted by each one complement or distance themselves from one another. For our mythical sources we selected the theoretical contributions of Lía Galán (2003) and Pierre Grimal (1989). Also, to complement the comparative analysis of the selected corpus, we rely on Lía Galán's interpretation of Carmen 64 and Claudia Lobo's (2009) analysis of the Heroides, focusing on the heroine's claims to her beloved. In this work we try to provide a new point of view on the mythical-literary past, in order to introduce a hero and a heroine that are far from the epic tradition ideal. el mito de Ariadna y Teseo ha sido fuente de inspiración y escritura para distintos autores a través del tiempo. Nuestro trabajo aborda la reelaboración realizada por Catulo de su Carmen 64 y por Ovidio de su Heroida X, a fin de profundizar en la perspectiva de la voz de la heroína, Ariadna, y en la construcción del héroe realizada a través de la mirada femenina. Los autores mencionados pertenecen a dos momentos históricos y culturales diferentes de Roma, la República y el Imperio, respectivamente, por lo que consideramos relevante su contraste para analizar en qué se complementan o distancian las versiones adoptadas por cada uno. Para referirnos a las fuentes míticas de los textos, seleccionamos los aportes teóricos de Lía Galán (2003) y Pierre Grimal (1989). A su vez, para complementar el análisis comparativo del corpus seleccionado, nos apoyamos en la interpretación de Galán sobre el Carmen 64 y en el análisis realizado por Claudia Lobo (2009) sobre las Heroidas, focalizado en los reclamos de la heroína por el amado ausente. En el presente trabajo buscamos proporcionar una nueva mirada sobre el pasado mítico-literario, para presentar un héroe y una heroína alejados del ideal de la tradición épica. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Letras 2024-07-05 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado a ciegas por pares application/pdf text/html application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/notalmargen/article/view/44779 Nota al margen; Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024); 67-82 Nota al margen; Vol. 2 Núm. 3 (2024); 67-82 3008-7015 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/notalmargen/article/view/44779/45578 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/notalmargen/article/view/44779/45579 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/notalmargen/article/view/44779/45580 Derechos de autor 2024 María del Rosario Corbalán, Anahí Yamile Albornoz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-278
container_title_str Nota al margen
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic representación
Catulo
Ovidio
Ariadna
Teseo
Heroidas
Catullus
Ovid
Ariadne
Theseus
Heroides
representation
spellingShingle representación
Catulo
Ovidio
Ariadna
Teseo
Heroidas
Catullus
Ovid
Ariadne
Theseus
Heroides
representation
Corbalán, María del Rosario
Albornoz, Anahí Yamile
Representation of Theseus from the Perspective of Ariadne, According to Catullus and Ovid
topic_facet representación
Catulo
Ovidio
Ariadna
Teseo
Heroidas
Catullus
Ovid
Ariadne
Theseus
Heroides
representation
author Corbalán, María del Rosario
Albornoz, Anahí Yamile
author_facet Corbalán, María del Rosario
Albornoz, Anahí Yamile
author_sort Corbalán, María del Rosario
title Representation of Theseus from the Perspective of Ariadne, According to Catullus and Ovid
title_short Representation of Theseus from the Perspective of Ariadne, According to Catullus and Ovid
title_full Representation of Theseus from the Perspective of Ariadne, According to Catullus and Ovid
title_fullStr Representation of Theseus from the Perspective of Ariadne, According to Catullus and Ovid
title_full_unstemmed Representation of Theseus from the Perspective of Ariadne, According to Catullus and Ovid
title_sort representation of theseus from the perspective of ariadne, according to catullus and ovid
description The myth of Ariadne and Theseus has been a source of inspiration for different authors throughout time. Our work engages with the reworking carried out by Catullus in his poem Carmen 64 and for Ovid in his production on Heroida X, in order to delve into the perspective of the voice of the heroine, Ariadne, and how the hero figure is built through her gaze as a woman. These authors belong to two different historical and cultural moments in Rome, the Republic and the Empire, respectively. Therefore, we consider it relevant to contrast them, so it's possible for us to analyze how the versions adopted by each one complement or distance themselves from one another. For our mythical sources we selected the theoretical contributions of Lía Galán (2003) and Pierre Grimal (1989). Also, to complement the comparative analysis of the selected corpus, we rely on Lía Galán's interpretation of Carmen 64 and Claudia Lobo's (2009) analysis of the Heroides, focusing on the heroine's claims to her beloved. In this work we try to provide a new point of view on the mythical-literary past, in order to introduce a hero and a heroine that are far from the epic tradition ideal.
publisher Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Letras
publishDate 2024
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/notalmargen/article/view/44779
work_keys_str_mv AT corbalanmariadelrosario representationoftheseusfromtheperspectiveofariadneaccordingtocatullusandovid
AT albornozanahiyamile representationoftheseusfromtheperspectiveofariadneaccordingtocatullusandovid
AT corbalanmariadelrosario representaciondeteseodesdelamiradadeariadnaseguncatuloyovidio
AT albornozanahiyamile representaciondeteseodesdelamiradadeariadnaseguncatuloyovidio
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:37:59Z
last_indexed 2025-02-05T22:15:57Z
_version_ 1823257403558199296

Ejemplares similares