IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS

Mostrar todas las versiones(3)

In this paper, we will use the Althusserian concept of problematic to rethink structuralism. Our question is: how to understand structuralism? How to indicate its limits when it was composed of a set of theoretical propositions that went through disciplines, which suffered crosses with various theor...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Steimberg, Rodrigo Martín
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2016
Materias:
Estructura
estructuralismo
Problemática
Postestructuralismo
Lévi-Strauss
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/11832
Aporte de:
Revistas de la UNC de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R10article-11832
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Estructura
estructuralismo
Problemática
Postestructuralismo
Lévi-Strauss
spellingShingle Estructura
estructuralismo
Problemática
Postestructuralismo
Lévi-Strauss
Steimberg, Rodrigo Martín
IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS
topic_facet Estructura
estructuralismo
Problemática
Postestructuralismo
Lévi-Strauss
author Steimberg, Rodrigo Martín
author_facet Steimberg, Rodrigo Martín
author_sort Steimberg, Rodrigo Martín
title IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS
title_short IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS
title_full IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS
title_fullStr IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS
title_full_unstemmed IN THE TRACKS OF STRUCTURALISM. STRUCTURALISM AS A FIELD OF TENSIONS
title_sort in the tracks of structuralism. structuralism as a field of tensions
description In this paper, we will use the Althusserian concept of problematic to rethink structuralism. Our question is: how to understand structuralism? How to indicate its limits when it was composed of a set of theoretical propositions that went through disciplines, which suffered crosses with various theories and whose premises were never clearly established? Based on the concept of problematic, developed by Althusser primarily on For Marx, we will question the set of theoretical propositions that shaped it, not so much as a canon applicable to the most diverse subjects, but as a theoretical space traversed by contradictions. Thus, we will build on this concept because we consider it particularly fertile to think a theoretical field more as a set of problems and questions than as a compendium of answers to clearly defined theoretical difficulties.We pretend to highlight the contradictions that underpin structuralism because they will lead us to suggest that it is possible to identify a distance within structuralism itself, gap that will show as a variant of structuralism the one which settles the impossibility of thinking a structure of structures that totalize them as a whole. This fact talks about how structuralism internal tensions mark out the path of poststructuralism.
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
publishDate 2016
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/11832
work_keys_str_mv AT steimbergrodrigomartin inthetracksofstructuralismstructuralismasafieldoftensions
AT steimbergrodrigomartin traslashuellasdelestructuralismoelestructuralismocomocampodetensiones
bdutipo_str Revistas
_version_ 1764819780714364931

Ejemplares similares