A testimonial judgment
It’s natural function of jurisprudence set the significant terms of the law. Therefore jurisprudence is for law, what talk is to speech. Jurisdiction is a common mechanism for handling, authority on the use of the word, compulsive use of representations of the world, meanings in permanent movements....
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/11676 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I10-R10article-11676 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
institution_str |
I-10 |
repository_str |
R-10 |
container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
language |
Español |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
family violence GBV public interest legal discourse violencia familiar violencia de género interés público discurso jurídico |
spellingShingle |
family violence GBV public interest legal discourse violencia familiar violencia de género interés público discurso jurídico Suarez, María de las Mercedes A testimonial judgment |
topic_facet |
family violence GBV public interest legal discourse violencia familiar violencia de género interés público discurso jurídico |
author |
Suarez, María de las Mercedes |
author_facet |
Suarez, María de las Mercedes |
author_sort |
Suarez, María de las Mercedes |
title |
A testimonial judgment |
title_short |
A testimonial judgment |
title_full |
A testimonial judgment |
title_fullStr |
A testimonial judgment |
title_full_unstemmed |
A testimonial judgment |
title_sort |
testimonial judgment |
description |
It’s natural function of jurisprudence set the significant terms of the law. Therefore jurisprudence is for law, what talk is to speech. Jurisdiction is a common mechanism for handling, authority on the use of the word, compulsive use of representations of the world, meanings in permanent movements.The legislative peculiarity of insert confused expressions, expands the scope of discretion, in the interpretive event. In such contingencies jurisprudence as a discursive kind, should not only set the scope of the signifier, but must also create it, -no natural or improper function- because the system generates empty concepts, that is, without meaning in natural language. In in this cases judge assumes without legal (constitutional) delegation, legislative power, democratically prohibited.Include among the “public interest” case “in which it is observed a reiteration of aggressive behavior and a marked risk of occurrence is perceived a marked risk of new facts, of increasing severity”, is to extend the meaning of expression beyond the limit to where communication is possible. |
publisher |
Facultad de Derecho |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/11676 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT suarezmariadelasmercedes atestimonialjudgment AT suarezmariadelasmercedes unfallotestimonial AT suarezmariadelasmercedes testimonialjudgment |
bdutipo_str |
Revistas |
_version_ |
1764819780677664770 |