VALIDITY OF BÉASSE. A REVIEW OF CRITICISM OF AXEL HONNETH ON MICHEL FOUCAULT

In this paper I analyze how Axel Honneth interprets, in his book Critique of power, the social philosophy of Michel Foucault. Honneth notes a contradiction between what he calls the Foucault’s theory of power and his historical studies (particularly those contained in Discipline and Punish). One of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Abril, Francisco
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/10750
Aporte de:
id I10-R10article-10750
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Foucault
Honneth
Critical Theory
tactic
discipline
Foucault
Honneth
teoría crítica
táctica
disciplina
spellingShingle Foucault
Honneth
Critical Theory
tactic
discipline
Foucault
Honneth
teoría crítica
táctica
disciplina
Abril, Francisco
VALIDITY OF BÉASSE. A REVIEW OF CRITICISM OF AXEL HONNETH ON MICHEL FOUCAULT
topic_facet Foucault
Honneth
Critical Theory
tactic
discipline
Foucault
Honneth
teoría crítica
táctica
disciplina
author Abril, Francisco
author_facet Abril, Francisco
author_sort Abril, Francisco
title VALIDITY OF BÉASSE. A REVIEW OF CRITICISM OF AXEL HONNETH ON MICHEL FOUCAULT
title_short VALIDITY OF BÉASSE. A REVIEW OF CRITICISM OF AXEL HONNETH ON MICHEL FOUCAULT
title_full VALIDITY OF BÉASSE. A REVIEW OF CRITICISM OF AXEL HONNETH ON MICHEL FOUCAULT
title_fullStr VALIDITY OF BÉASSE. A REVIEW OF CRITICISM OF AXEL HONNETH ON MICHEL FOUCAULT
title_full_unstemmed VALIDITY OF BÉASSE. A REVIEW OF CRITICISM OF AXEL HONNETH ON MICHEL FOUCAULT
title_sort validity of béasse. a review of criticism of axel honneth on michel foucault
description In this paper I analyze how Axel Honneth interprets, in his book Critique of power, the social philosophy of Michel Foucault. Honneth notes a contradiction between what he calls the Foucault’s theory of power and his historical studies (particularly those contained in Discipline and Punish). One of my aims is to explain this contradiction and propose an alternative reading. Honneth supposed that disciplinary institutions end up displacing action and social struggle. Conversely, I try to show –this is the contribution that I would like to do in the article, based on a conceptual reconstruction– that the disciplines and disciplinary institutions should be considered as tactics that never quite reach your goal. These are tactics that fail to block definitively the expression of resistance and conflict. This alternative reading that I propose allows, in principle, two contact points between Foucault and critical theory that have not yet been elucidated. 
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
publishDate 2015
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/10750
work_keys_str_mv AT abrilfrancisco validityofbeasseareviewofcriticismofaxelhonnethonmichelfoucault
AT abrilfrancisco lapermanenciadebeasseunarevisiondelacriticadeaxelhonnethamichelfoucault
bdutipo_str Revistas
_version_ 1764819780239360000