The Case Caroline. A precedent of international self-defense?
The part of the international doctrine, that argue for the existence of a right to preventive self-defense in the international law, invoke the case Caroline as his precedent. This article aims to show why this case is neither a precedent of preventive self-defense nor a precedent of self-defense. T...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6289 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R10-article-6289 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R10-article-62892019-03-27T13:38:16Z The Case Caroline. A precedent of international self-defense? El caso Caroline ¿un precedente de legitima defensa preventiva? Pintore, Eduardo José Case Caroline preventive self-defense Falkland Islands permanent attack permanent danger state of necessity. Caso Caroline legítima defensa preventiva Islas Malvinas - ataque permanente peligro permanente estado de necesidad The part of the international doctrine, that argue for the existence of a right to preventive self-defense in the international law, invoke the case Caroline as his precedent. This article aims to show why this case is neither a precedent of preventive self-defense nor a precedent of self-defense. The conclusion is that the case Caroline is to be revaluate as a precedent of international necessity and not as one of self-defense, on the ground of the absence of a state as active subject, that execute an armed attack in the sense of the legal institution of the international self-defense. La parte de la doctrina internacional que argumenta a favor de la existencia de un derecho a legítima defensa preventiva en el derecho internacional, invoca el caso Caroline como su precedente. Este artículo tiene por finalidad demostrar por qué este caso no constituye ni un precedente de legítima defensa preventiva ni un precedente de legítima defensa. El resultado demuestra que el caso Caroline debe ser revalorado como un precedente de estado de necesidad internacional y no de legítima defensa, sobre la base de la ausencia de un Estado como sujeto activo que ejecute un ataque armado a los fines del instituto jurídico de la legítima defensa internacional. Facultad de Derecho 2011-11-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6289 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2011): Nueva Serie II 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6289/7375 Derechos de autor 2011 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-10 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Case Caroline preventive self-defense Falkland Islands permanent attack permanent danger state of necessity. Caso Caroline legítima defensa preventiva Islas Malvinas - ataque permanente peligro permanente estado de necesidad |
| spellingShingle |
Case Caroline preventive self-defense Falkland Islands permanent attack permanent danger state of necessity. Caso Caroline legítima defensa preventiva Islas Malvinas - ataque permanente peligro permanente estado de necesidad Pintore, Eduardo José The Case Caroline. A precedent of international self-defense? |
| topic_facet |
Case Caroline preventive self-defense Falkland Islands permanent attack permanent danger state of necessity. Caso Caroline legítima defensa preventiva Islas Malvinas - ataque permanente peligro permanente estado de necesidad |
| author |
Pintore, Eduardo José |
| author_facet |
Pintore, Eduardo José |
| author_sort |
Pintore, Eduardo José |
| title |
The Case Caroline. A precedent of international self-defense? |
| title_short |
The Case Caroline. A precedent of international self-defense? |
| title_full |
The Case Caroline. A precedent of international self-defense? |
| title_fullStr |
The Case Caroline. A precedent of international self-defense? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Case Caroline. A precedent of international self-defense? |
| title_sort |
case caroline. a precedent of international self-defense? |
| description |
The part of the international doctrine, that argue for the existence of a right to preventive self-defense in the international law, invoke the case Caroline as his precedent. This article aims to show why this case is neither a precedent of preventive self-defense nor a precedent of self-defense. The conclusion is that the case Caroline is to be revaluate as a precedent of international necessity and not as one of self-defense, on the ground of the absence of a state as active subject, that execute an armed attack in the sense of the legal institution of the international self-defense. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Derecho |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6289 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT pintoreeduardojose thecasecarolineaprecedentofinternationalselfdefense AT pintoreeduardojose elcasocarolineunprecedentedelegitimadefensapreventiva AT pintoreeduardojose casecarolineaprecedentofinternationalselfdefense |
| first_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:22:00Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:22:00Z |
| _version_ |
1770718663086702592 |