Some considerations on disagreements around the concept of due diligence in the ilc draft on responsibility of states for international wrongful acts
This paper analyzes the international responsibility of States for lack of due diligence, something that was not resolved within the framework of the International Law Commission of the United Nations (ILC) draft on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts (2001). We highlight the...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5947 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I10-R10-article-5947 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
I10-R10-article-59472019-03-27T13:37:41Z Some considerations on disagreements around the concept of due diligence in the ilc draft on responsibility of states for international wrongful acts Algunas consideraciones sobre las discordancias en torno a la noción de diligencia debida en el proyecto de la CDI sobre responsabilidad por hecho ilícito de los Estados Elorrio, Magdalena García responsabilidad por ilícito estados diligencia debida CDI proyectos responsibility for wrongful acts states due diligence ILC projects This paper analyzes the international responsibility of States for lack of due diligence, something that was not resolved within the framework of the International Law Commission of the United Nations (ILC) draft on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts (2001). We highlight the differences between the different projects and make a critical analysis of them in order to clarify the basis on which is now possible to support the international responsibility of States for lack of due diligence. Este trabajo analiza la cuestión de la responsabilidad internacional del Estado por falta de diligencia debida, aspecto que no quedó resuelto en el marco del Proyecto de la Comisión de Derecho Internacional de Naciones Unidas (CDI) sobre responsabilidad de los Estados por hechos internacionalmente ilícitos (2001). Destacamos las diferencias existentes entre los distintos proyectos y realizamos un análisis crítico de ellas con el objeto de poder precisar sobre la base de qué artículos de dicho Proyecto, es posible actualmente sustentar la responsabilidad internacional del Estado por falta de diligencia debida. Facultad de Derecho 2011-04-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5947 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2011): Nueva Serie II 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5947/6845 Derechos de autor 2011 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
institution_str |
I-10 |
repository_str |
R-10 |
container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
language |
Español |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
responsabilidad por ilícito estados diligencia debida CDI proyectos responsibility for wrongful acts states due diligence ILC projects |
spellingShingle |
responsabilidad por ilícito estados diligencia debida CDI proyectos responsibility for wrongful acts states due diligence ILC projects Elorrio, Magdalena García Some considerations on disagreements around the concept of due diligence in the ilc draft on responsibility of states for international wrongful acts |
topic_facet |
responsabilidad por ilícito estados diligencia debida CDI proyectos responsibility for wrongful acts states due diligence ILC projects |
author |
Elorrio, Magdalena García |
author_facet |
Elorrio, Magdalena García |
author_sort |
Elorrio, Magdalena García |
title |
Some considerations on disagreements around the concept of due diligence in the ilc draft on responsibility of states for international wrongful acts |
title_short |
Some considerations on disagreements around the concept of due diligence in the ilc draft on responsibility of states for international wrongful acts |
title_full |
Some considerations on disagreements around the concept of due diligence in the ilc draft on responsibility of states for international wrongful acts |
title_fullStr |
Some considerations on disagreements around the concept of due diligence in the ilc draft on responsibility of states for international wrongful acts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Some considerations on disagreements around the concept of due diligence in the ilc draft on responsibility of states for international wrongful acts |
title_sort |
some considerations on disagreements around the concept of due diligence in the ilc draft on responsibility of states for international wrongful acts |
description |
This paper analyzes the international responsibility of States for lack of due diligence, something that was not resolved within the framework of the International Law Commission of the United Nations (ILC) draft on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts (2001). We highlight the differences between the different projects and make a critical analysis of them in order to clarify the basis on which is now possible to support the international responsibility of States for lack of due diligence. |
publisher |
Facultad de Derecho |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5947 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elorriomagdalenagarcia someconsiderationsondisagreementsaroundtheconceptofduediligenceintheilcdraftonresponsibilityofstatesforinternationalwrongfulacts AT elorriomagdalenagarcia algunasconsideracionessobrelasdiscordanciasentornoalanociondediligenciadebidaenelproyectodelacdisobreresponsabilidadporhechoilicitodelosestados |
first_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:21:43Z |
last_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:21:43Z |
_version_ |
1770718642236817408 |