The specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”The case of women “in transition”
This paper attempts to account the drastic change in the relationships with that happens between de anthropologist and the interlocutors in the case of women who go from being deprived of their liberty on their return to free society (“probation”). Methodological conditions that had been established...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología
2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5452 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R10-article-5452 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R10-article-54522021-06-18T17:45:56Z The specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”The case of women “in transition” La especificidad de la metodología de la investigación social en el trabajo con personas en “libertad condicional”. El caso de las mujeres “en transición” Kalinsky, Beatriz mujeres libertad condicional metodología relaciones recurso heurístico women probation methodology relationships heuristic source This paper attempts to account the drastic change in the relationships with that happens between de anthropologist and the interlocutors in the case of women who go from being deprived of their liberty on their return to free society (“probation”). Methodological conditions that had been established during the progress of their sentence in jail can not be sustained anymore from a methodological point of view and practical and ethical issues so we must need to think what to do with the fissures that are created and likewise the mutual responsibilities appearing that radically change the scenario of an anthropological research on this subject. This paper also emphasizes the lack of references and the lack of practical investigations. We believe that this article may help to broaden the view in such situations and act as a heuristic source for similar situations. Este trabajo intenta dar cuenta del cambio drástico de las relaciones del antropólogo con los interlocutores en el caso de mujeres que pasan de estar privadas de la libertad a su regreso a la sociedad libre (“libertad condicional”). Las condiciones metodológicas que ya habían sido establecidas durante el progreso de su sentencia en la cárcel ya no pueden sostenerse desde un punto de vista metodológico, práctico y ético con lo que deben replantearse cuestiones que tienen que ver con las fisuras que se crean y las responsabilidades mutuas que aparecen y cambian radicalmente el escenario de una investigación antropológica sobre el tema. Asimismo, se recalca la falta de referentes bibliográficos y prácticos por la falta de investigaciones al respecto. Creemos que este artículo puede contribuir a ampliar el panorama en este tipo de situaciones y actuar como recurso heurístico o ejemplo para situaciones semejantes. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2010-12-26 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed article Artículo revisado por pares investigación aplicada Artigo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5452 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 3 (2010) NÚMERO 1; 113-122 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 3 (2010) NÚMERO 1; 113-122 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 3 (2010) NÚMERO 1; 113-122 1852-4826 1852-060X 10.31048/1852.4826.v3.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5452/5898 Derechos de autor 2010 Beatriz Kalinsky |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-10 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
mujeres libertad condicional metodología relaciones recurso heurístico women probation methodology relationships heuristic source |
| spellingShingle |
mujeres libertad condicional metodología relaciones recurso heurístico women probation methodology relationships heuristic source Kalinsky, Beatriz The specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”The case of women “in transition” |
| topic_facet |
mujeres libertad condicional metodología relaciones recurso heurístico women probation methodology relationships heuristic source |
| author |
Kalinsky, Beatriz |
| author_facet |
Kalinsky, Beatriz |
| author_sort |
Kalinsky, Beatriz |
| title |
The specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”The case of women “in transition” |
| title_short |
The specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”The case of women “in transition” |
| title_full |
The specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”The case of women “in transition” |
| title_fullStr |
The specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”The case of women “in transition” |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”The case of women “in transition” |
| title_sort |
specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”the case of women “in transition” |
| description |
This paper attempts to account the drastic change in the relationships with that happens between de anthropologist and the interlocutors in the case of women who go from being deprived of their liberty on their return to free society (“probation”). Methodological conditions that had been established during the progress of their sentence in jail can not be sustained anymore from a methodological point of view and practical and ethical issues so we must need to think what to do with the fissures that are created and likewise the mutual responsibilities appearing that radically change the scenario of an anthropological research on this subject. This paper also emphasizes the lack of references and the lack of practical investigations. We believe that this article may help to broaden the view in such situations and act as a heuristic source for similar situations. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5452 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT kalinskybeatriz thespecificityofsocialresearchmethodologywhenworkingwithpeopleonprobationthecaseofwomenintransition AT kalinskybeatriz laespecificidaddelametodologiadelainvestigacionsocialeneltrabajoconpersonasenlibertadcondicionalelcasodelasmujeresentransicion AT kalinskybeatriz specificityofsocialresearchmethodologywhenworkingwithpeopleonprobationthecaseofwomenintransition |
| first_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:10:59Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:10:59Z |
| _version_ |
1770717769033056256 |